J A Hanley1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A2. James.Hanley@McGill.CA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the definitional formula for population attributable fraction is not usually directly usable in applications, separate estimation formulas are required. However, most epidemiology textbooks limit their coverage to Levin's formula, based on the (dichotomous) distribution of the exposure of interest in the population. Few present or explain Miettinen's formula, based on the distribution of the exposure in the cases; and even fewer present the corresponding formulas for situations with more than two levels of exposure. Thus, many health researchers and public health practitioners are unaware of, or are not confident in their use of, these formulas, particularly when they involve several exposure levels, or confounding factors. METHODS/ RESULTS: A heuristic approach, coupled with pictorial representations, is offered to help understand and interconnect the structures behind the Levin and Miettinen formulas. The pictorial representation shows how to deal correctly with several exposure levels, and why a commonly used approach is incorrect. Correct and incorrect approaches are also presented for situations where estimates must be aggregated over strata of a confounding factor.
BACKGROUND: As the definitional formula for population attributable fraction is not usually directly usable in applications, separate estimation formulas are required. However, most epidemiology textbooks limit their coverage to Levin's formula, based on the (dichotomous) distribution of the exposure of interest in the population. Few present or explain Miettinen's formula, based on the distribution of the exposure in the cases; and even fewer present the corresponding formulas for situations with more than two levels of exposure. Thus, many health researchers and public health practitioners are unaware of, or are not confident in their use of, these formulas, particularly when they involve several exposure levels, or confounding factors. METHODS/ RESULTS: A heuristic approach, coupled with pictorial representations, is offered to help understand and interconnect the structures behind the Levin and Miettinen formulas. The pictorial representation shows how to deal correctly with several exposure levels, and why a commonly used approach is incorrect. Correct and incorrect approaches are also presented for situations where estimates must be aggregated over strata of a confounding factor.
Authors: Renate B Schnabel; Thor Aspelund; Guo Li; Lisa M Sullivan; Astrid Suchy-Dicey; Tamara B Harris; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy; William B Kannel; Thomas J Wang; Richard A Kronmal; Philip A Wolf; Gregory L Burke; Lenore J Launer; Ramachandran S Vasan; Bruce M Psaty; Emelia J Benjamin; Vilmundur Gudnason; Susan R Heckbert Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-11-22
Authors: Jürgen Rehm; Dolly Baliunas; Guilherme L G Borges; Kathryn Graham; Hyacinth Irving; Tara Kehoe; Charles D Parry; Jayadeep Patra; Svetlana Popova; Vladimir Poznyak; Michael Roerecke; Robin Room; Andriy V Samokhvalov; Benjamin Taylor Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Anna Kosheleva; Pamela D Waterman; Jarvis T Chen; Karestan Koenen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Franz Wiesbauer; Hermann Blessberger; Georg Goliasch; Erik Walter Holy; Stephan Pfaffenberger; Ioannis Tentzeris; Gerald Maurer; Kurt Huber; Farshid Abdolvahab; Gottfried Sodeck; Markus Exner; Johann Wojta; Martin Schillinger Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 8.082