A E Street1, S E Gilman2, A J Rosellini3, M B Stein4, E J Bromet5, K L Cox6, L J Colpe7, C S Fullerton8, M J Gruber3, S G Heeringa9, L Lewandowski-Romps9, R J A Little10, J A Naifeh8, M K Nock11, N A Sampson3, M Schoenbaum12, R J Ursano8, A M Zaslavsky3, R C Kessler3. 1. National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System,Boston,MA,USA. 2. Departments of Social and Behavioral Sciences, and Epidemiology,Harvard School of Public Health,Boston,MA,USA. 3. Department of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA. 4. Departments of Psychiatry and Family and Preventive Medicine,University of California San Diego,La Jolla,CA,USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry,Stony Brook University School of Medicine,Stony Brook,NY,USA. 6. US Army Public Health Command,Aberdeen Proving Ground,MD,USA. 7. Division of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda,MD,USA. 8. Department of Psychiatry,Uniformed Services University School of Medicine,Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress,Bethesda,MD,USA. 9. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USA. 10. Department of Biostatistics,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USA. 11. Department of Psychology,Harvard University,Cambridge,MA,USA. 12. Office of Science Policy,Planning and Communications,National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda,MD,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) has found that the proportional elevation in the US Army enlisted soldier suicide rate during deployment (compared with the never-deployed or previously deployed) is significantly higher among women than men, raising the possibility of gender differences in the adverse psychological effects of deployment. METHOD: Person-month survival models based on a consolidated administrative database for active duty enlisted Regular Army soldiers in 2004-2009 (n = 975,057) were used to characterize the gender × deployment interaction predicting suicide. Four explanatory hypotheses were explored involving the proportion of females in each soldier's occupation, the proportion of same-gender soldiers in each soldier's unit, whether the soldier reported sexual assault victimization in the previous 12 months, and the soldier's pre-deployment history of treated mental/behavioral disorders. RESULTS: The suicide rate of currently deployed women (14.0/100,000 person-years) was 3.1-3.5 times the rates of other (i.e. never-deployed/previously deployed) women. The suicide rate of currently deployed men (22.6/100,000 person-years) was 0.9-1.2 times the rates of other men. The adjusted (for time trends, sociodemographics, and Army career variables) female:male odds ratio comparing the suicide rates of currently deployed v. other women v. men was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.1-6.8), became 2.4 after excluding soldiers with Direct Combat Arms occupations, and remained elevated (in the range 1.9-2.8) after adjusting for the hypothesized explanatory variables. CONCLUSIONS: These results are valuable in excluding otherwise plausible hypotheses for the elevated suicide rate of deployed women and point to the importance of expanding future research on the psychological challenges of deployment for women.
BACKGROUND: The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) has found that the proportional elevation in the US Army enlisted soldier suicide rate during deployment (compared with the never-deployed or previously deployed) is significantly higher among women than men, raising the possibility of gender differences in the adverse psychological effects of deployment. METHOD:Person-month survival models based on a consolidated administrative database for active duty enlisted Regular Army soldiers in 2004-2009 (n = 975,057) were used to characterize the gender × deployment interaction predicting suicide. Four explanatory hypotheses were explored involving the proportion of females in each soldier's occupation, the proportion of same-gender soldiers in each soldier's unit, whether the soldier reported sexual assault victimization in the previous 12 months, and the soldier's pre-deployment history of treated mental/behavioral disorders. RESULTS: The suicide rate of currently deployed women (14.0/100,000 person-years) was 3.1-3.5 times the rates of other (i.e. never-deployed/previously deployed) women. The suicide rate of currently deployed men (22.6/100,000 person-years) was 0.9-1.2 times the rates of other men. The adjusted (for time trends, sociodemographics, and Army career variables) female:male odds ratio comparing the suicide rates of currently deployed v. other women v. men was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.1-6.8), became 2.4 after excluding soldiers with Direct Combat Arms occupations, and remained elevated (in the range 1.9-2.8) after adjusting for the hypothesized explanatory variables. CONCLUSIONS: These results are valuable in excluding otherwise plausible hypotheses for the elevated suicide rate of deployed women and point to the importance of expanding future research on the psychological challenges of deployment for women.
Authors: Robert H Pietrzak; Marc B Goldstein; James C Malley; Alison J Rivers; Douglas C Johnson; Steven M Southwick Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Christopher H Warner; George N Appenzeller; Jessica R Parker; Carolynn M Warner; Charles W Hoge Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jennifer Wilson; Margaret Jones; Nicola T Fear; Lisa Hull; Matthew Hotopf; Simon Wessely; Roberto J Rona Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Megan L Rogers; Fallon B Ringer; Matthew S Michaels; Bruno Chiurliza; Christopher R Hagan; Carol Chu; Matthew E Schneider; Ingrid C Lim; Thomas E Joiner Journal: Mil Behav Health Date: 2016-10-25
Authors: Jitender Sareen; Tracie O Afifi; Tamara Taillieu; Kristene Cheung; Sarah Turner; Murray B Stein; Mark A Zamorski Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Lindsey Zimmerman; Jennifer L Villatte; Amanda H Kerbrat; David C Atkins; Aaron Flaster; Kate A Comtois Journal: Mil Behav Health Date: 2015-09-16
Authors: James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Robert J Ursano; Patti L Vegella; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Ronald C Kessler; Christina L Wryter; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2016-11-01
Authors: R C Kessler; M B Stein; P D Bliese; E J Bromet; W T Chiu; K L Cox; L J Colpe; C S Fullerton; S E Gilman; M J Gruber; S G Heeringa; L Lewandowski-Romps; A Millikan-Bell; J A Naifeh; M K Nock; M V Petukhova; A J Rosellini; N A Sampson; M Schoenbaum; A M Zaslavsky; R J Ursano Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; Murray B Stein; James A Naifeh; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Patti L Vegella; Tsz Hin Hinz Ng; Bailey G Zhang; Christina L Wryter; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Lisa J Colpe; Michael Schoenbaum; James E McCarroll; Kenneth L Cox; Steven G Heeringa Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Carol Chu; Matthew Podlogar; Christopher R Hagan; Jennifer M Buchman-Schmitt; Caroline Silva; Bruno Chiurliza; Jennifer L Hames; Ian H Stanley; Ltc Ingrid C Lim; Thomas E Joiner Journal: Cognit Ther Res Date: 2015-09-29
Authors: Kelly L Zuromski; Samantha L Bernecker; Carol Chu; Chelsey R Wilks; Peter M Gutierrez; Thomas E Joiner; Howard Liu; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-12-07 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: R C Kessler; M B Stein; M V Petukhova; P Bliese; R M Bossarte; E J Bromet; C S Fullerton; S E Gilman; C Ivany; L Lewandowski-Romps; A Millikan Bell; J A Naifeh; M K Nock; B Y Reis; A J Rosellini; N A Sampson; A M Zaslavsky; R J Ursano Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 15.992