| Literature DB >> 25049979 |
D J Song1, H Y Kang1, J Q Wang1, H Peng1, D P Bu1.
Abstract
The effect of Bacillus subtilis natto on hindgut fermentation and microbiota of early lactation Holstein dairy cows was investigated in this study. Thirty-six Holstein dairy cows in early lactation were randomly allocated to three groups: no B. subtilis natto as the control group, B. subtilis natto with 0.5×10(11) cfu as DMF1 group and B. subtilis natto with 1.0×10(11) cfu as DMF2 group. After 14 days of adaptation period, the formal experiment was started and lasted for 63 days. Fecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of each animal on the morning at the end of eighth week and placed into sterile plastic bags. The pH, NH3-N and VFA concentration were determined and fecal bacteria DNA was extracted and analyzed by DGGE. The results showed that the addition of B. subtilus natto at either treatment level resulted in a decrease in fecal NH3-N concentration but had no effect on fecal pH and VFA. The DGGE profile revealed that B. subtilis natto affected the population of fecal bacteria. The diversity index of Shannon-Wiener in DFM1 decreased significantly compared to the control. Fecal Alistipes sp., Clostridium sp., Roseospira sp., beta proteobacterium were decreased and Bifidobacterium was increased after supplementing with B. subtilis natto. This study demonstrated that B. subtilis natto had a tendency to change fecal microbiota balance.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis natto; DGGE; Dairy Cow; Fecal Microbiota
Year: 2014 PMID: 25049979 PMCID: PMC4093534 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Ingredient and chemical composition of the diet (DM basis)
| Item | TMR |
|---|---|
| Ingredient (%) | |
| Corn silage | 23.10 |
| Alfalfa hay | 9.20 |
| Chinese wildrye | 8.60 |
| Corn grain | 12.90 |
| Dry distillers grains | 2.60 |
| Soybean meal | 8.80 |
| Soybean dried grain | 3.73 |
| Barley grain | 5.90 |
| Beet pulp | 5.90 |
| Cotton seed meal | 3.93 |
| Soybean curb residue | 5.60 |
| Wheat bran | 2.40 |
| Calcium hydrogen phosphate | 1.32 |
| Rumen protected methionine | 0.06 |
| Fatty powder | 0.85 |
| Limestone | 1.56 |
| Salt | 1.02 |
| Molasses | 0.08 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 1.81 |
| Magnesium oxide | 0.21 |
| Premix | 0.43 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Chemical composition | |
| NEL | 1.38 |
| CP (% DM) | 17.77 |
| NDF (% DM) | 43.80 |
| ADF (% DM) | 21.83 |
| Ca (% DM) | 0.94 |
| P (% DM) | 0.41 |
Contained per kilogram of the premix: vitamin A, 2,000,000 IU; vitamin D, 300,000 IU; vitamin E, 3,000 IU; Cu, 3,500 mg; Fe, 10,000 mg; Zn, 10,000 mg; Mn, 9,000 mg; Mg, 9,800 mg; I, 90 mg; Se, 40 mg; Co, 30 mg.
Calculated value (based on China Standard NY/t 34, 2004 and NRC (2001)).
Effects of feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on fecal pH, NH3-N, and VFA
| Item | Treatment | SEM | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| CON | DFM1 | DFM2 | |||
| pH | 6.83 | 6.78 | 6.76 | 0.04 | 0.37 |
| NH3-N (mg/mL) | 13.01 | 10.36 | 10.02 | 0.89 | 0.07 |
| TVFA (mmol/L) | 22.93 | 22.43 | 22.63 | 1.01 | 0.94 |
| Acetate (mmol/L) | 17.34 | 16.35 | 17.12 | 0.8 | 0.667 |
| Propionate (mmol/L) | 3.99 | 4.08 | 3.88 | 0.19 | 0.80 |
| Butyric (mmol/L) | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.07 | 0.99 |
| Valeric (mmol/L) | 0.3213 | 0.2809 | 0.2915 | 0.01 | 0.16 |
| Isobutyric (mmol/L) | 3.99 | 3.96 | 3.88 | 0.21 | 0.94 |
| Isovaleric (mmol/L) | 0.2 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.83 |
CON = No B. subtilis natto; DFM1 = 0.5×1011 CFU of B. subtilis natto/d; DFM2 = 1.0×1011 CFU of B. subtilis natto/d.
Figure 1(a) DGGE profiles of 16S rDNA sequences amplified from DNA extracted from the eight week of the trial. Lane 1 to 6: CON; lane 7 to 12: DFM1. (b) UPGMA clustering of Figure 1(a). No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 represent CON; No. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 represent DFM1.
Percentages sequence similarity of uncultured phenotypes from fecal samples of the 8 week colonizers to other sequences in Genebank
| Bands | Treatment | Expect | Identities (%) | Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 9e-82 | 170/171(99) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 2 | Control | 3e-97 | 198/199(99) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 3 | DFM1 | 3e-82 | 169/169(100) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 4-1 | Control | 4e-91 | 189/191(99) | |
| 4-2 | Control | 3e-92 | 190/191(99) | Uncultured |
| 5-1 | Control | 4e-85 | 174/174(100) | |
| 5-2 | Control | 2e-84 | 173/173 (100) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 6-1 | Control | 4e-85 | 174/174 (100) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 6-2 | Control | 9e-82 | 170/171 (99) | |
| 7 | Control | 4e-85 | 174/174 (100) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 8 | Control | 3e-95 | 195/196 (99) | Uncultured |
| 9 | DFM1 | 1e-96 | 197/198 (99) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 9-1 | DFM1 | 2e-83 | 171/171 (100) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 9-2 | DFM1 | 2e-83 | 171/171 (100) | |
| 10-1 | DFM1 | 8e-93 | 188/188 (100) | |
| 10-2 | DFM1 | 6e-99 | 199/199 (100) | Uncultured bacterium |
| 11 | DFM1 | 9e-82 | 170/171 (99) | Uncultured bacterium |