Literature DB >> 12413082

Effect of a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on microbial profiles and fermentation patterns in the large intestine of horses fed a high fiber or a high starch diet.

B Medina1, I D Girard, E Jacotot, V Julliand.   

Abstract

Eight horses were allotted into pairs consisting of one cecum- and right ventral colon-fistulated animal and one cecum-fistulated animal. They were fed daily at the same level of intake either a high-fiber (HF) or a high-starch (HS) diet without or with 10 g of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae preparation, in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. The HS diet provided a starch overload (i.e., 3.4 g starch x kg(-1) BW x meal(-1)) while maintaining a high amount of fiber intake (i.e., dietary NDF/starch ratio was 1.0). A 21-d period of adaptation to the treatments occurred before cecal and colonic contents were withdrawn 4 h after the morning meal to count total anaerobic, cellulolytic, and lactic acid-utilizing bacteria, lactobacilli, and streptococci. Lactic acid, volatile fatty acids, ammonia concentrations, and pH were measured on cecal and colonic fluid samples collected hourly during the first 12-h postfeeding. When the HS diet was fed, the concentration of total anaerobic and lactic acid-utilizing bacteria increased (P < 0.001), whereas that of cellulolytic bacteria decreased (P < 0.05) in the cecum. The concentration of lactobacilli and streptococci increased (P < 0.001) in the cecal and colonic contents. These alterations of the microbial profiles were associated with decreases (P < 0.001) of pH, (acetate + butyrate)/propionate ratio and with an increase (P < 0.001) of lactic acid concentration. Supplementing the S. cerevisiae preparation increased (P < 0.01) the concentration of viable yeast cells, averaging 4.3 x 10(6) and 4.5 x 10(4) cfu/mL in the cecal and colonic contents, respectively. Yeast supplementation had almost no effect on microbial counts in the cecum and colon. The supplementation of S. cerevisiae appeared to modify (P < 0.05) pH, concentrations of lactic acid and ammonia, molar percentages of acetate and butyrate with the HS diet and [(acetate + butyrate)/propionate] ratio when the HF diet was fed. The effects of the S. cerevisiae preparation were greater in the cecum than in the colon, which coincided with the abundance of yeast cells. When the digestion of starch in the small intestine was saturated, the effect of the addition of a S. cerevisiae preparation appeared to limit the extent of undesirable changes in the intestinal ecosystem of the horse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413082     DOI: 10.2527/2002.80102600x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  15 in total

1.  Alterations in Intestinal Permeability: The Role of the "Leaky Gut" in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Amy Stieler Stewart; Shannon Pratt-Phillips; Liara M Gonzalez
Journal:  J Equine Vet Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.583

2.  Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Kirsty Dougal; Gabriel de la Fuente; Patricia A Harris; Susan E Girdwood; Eric Pinloche; Raymond J Geor; Brian D Nielsen; Harold C Schott; Sarah Elzinga; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse.

Authors:  Kirsty Dougal; Gabriel de la Fuente; Patricia A Harris; Susan E Girdwood; Eric Pinloche; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of Feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on Hindgut Fermentation and Microbiota of Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  D J Song; H Y Kang; J Q Wang; H Peng; D P Bu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Oral administration of fermented probiotics improves the condition of feces in adult horses.

Authors:  Saori Ishizaka; Akira Matsuda; Yosuke Amagai; Kumiko Oida; Hyosun Jang; Yuko Ueda; Masaki Takai; Akane Tanaka; Hiroshi Matsuda
Journal:  J Equine Sci       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 6.  Probiotic use in horses - what is the evidence for their clinical efficacy?

Authors:  A Schoster; J S Weese; L Guardabassi
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  A Potential Role for Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Development of Insulin Resistance in Horses.

Authors:  Jessica K Suagee; Benjamin A Corl; Raymond J Geor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Comparison of microbial populations in the small intestine, large intestine and feces of healthy horses using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  Angelika Schoster; Luis Guillermo Arroyo; Henry Rolf Staempfli; Jeffrey Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  High nutrient availability reduces the diversity and stability of the equine caecal microbiota.

Authors:  Naja C K Hansen; Ekaterina Avershina; Liv T Mydland; Jon A Næsset; Dag Austbø; Birgitte Moen; Ingrid Måge; Knut Rudi
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2015-08-04

10.  Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Brittany E Harlow; Laurie M Lawrence; Susan H Hayes; Andrea Crum; Michael D Flythe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.