Literature DB >> 33604519

Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis PB6 on feedlot phase growth performance, efficiency of dietary net energy utilization, and fecal and subiliac lymph node Salmonella prevalence in spring placement yearling beef steers fed in southeastern South Dakota,.

Zachary K Smith1, Paul Rand Broadway2, Keith R Underwood1, Warren C Rusche1, Julie A Walker1, Nicole C Burdick Sanchez2, Jeffrey A Carroll2, Doug Lafleur3, Jerilyn E Hergenreder3.   

Abstract

Yearling crossbred beef steers [N = 238; initial shrunk body weight (BW) = 402 ± 31.2 kg] were used to investigate the influence of a Bacillus subtilis probiotic on animal growth performance, efficiency of dietary net energy (NE) utilization, carcass characteristics, and fecal and subiliac lymph node Salmonella prevalence during a 140-d finishing period at the Southeast Research Farm in Beresford, SD. Steers were allotted to 1 of 24 pens (N = 9-10 steers/pen) and assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments (12 pens/treatment): no probiotic (CON) or 0.5 g/steer/d of a B. subtilis PB6 probiotic (CLOSTAT500, Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA; CLO). Bunks were managed according to a slick bunk management approach. Fecal samples were collected on study days 1, 28, 56, 112, and 140 from a subsample of steers from each pen (N = 5 steers/pen) via rectal palpation and composited by pen for the determination of Salmonella prevalence using selective enrichment and culture media. Upon harvest, subiliac lymph nodes were obtained from an equal number of steers from each treatment (collected from every other steer) following evisceration and hide removal. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design and pen served as the experimental unit; an α of 0.05 determined significance. Live-basis final BW and average daily gain tended (P ≤ 0.06) to be reduced for CLO. No differences were detected (P ≥ 0.11) between treatments for dry matter intake or gain efficiency. Treatment neither altered the efficiency of dietary NE utilization nor calculated dietary NE content based upon observed performance (P ≥ 0.46). No differences were detected between treatments for any carcass traits (P ≥ 0.15). No Salmonella was recovered in any fecal samples collected on study days 1, 28, or 56. On day 112, steers from CLO had a numerically lower (P = 0.17; 25.0 vs. 8.3%) incidence of fecal Salmonella compared to CON. On study day 140, fecal Salmonella incidence did not differ between treatments (P = 0.34; 0.0 vs. 8.3%) for CON and CLO, respectively. Upon harvest, no Salmonella was recovered in any subiliac lymph nodes. These data indicate that B. subtilis PB6 did not influence feedlot phase growth performance or fecal Salmonella prevalence. Additionally, Salmonella was not observed in the subiliac lymph nodes of any steers upon harvest.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus subtilis; Salmonella; beef; feedlot; probiotic

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604519      PMCID: PMC7881255          DOI: 10.1093/tas/txab002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Anim Sci        ISSN: 2573-2102


  13 in total

1.  The effects of implant strategy on finished body weight of beef cattle.

Authors:  P J Guiroy; L O Tedeschi; D G Fox; J P Hutcheson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Analysis of risk factors associated with Salmonella spp. isolated from U.S. feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Alice L Green; David A Dargatz; Bruce A Wagner; Paula J Fedorka-Cray; Scott R Ladely; Chris A Kopral
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 3.  Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads.

Authors:  G L Hahn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 to broiler diets on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology.

Authors:  Sinol Sen; S L Ingale; Y W Kim; J S Kim; K H Kim; J D Lohakare; E K Kim; H S Kim; M H Ryu; I K Kwon; B J Chae
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.534

5.  Effects of the transportation of beef cattle from the feedyard to the packing plant on prevalence levels of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella spp.

Authors:  A R Barham; B L Barham; A K Johnson; D M Allen; J R Blanton; M F Miller
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.077

6.  An evaluation of ruminally degradable intake protein and metabolizable amino acid requirements of feedlot calves.

Authors:  R A Zinn; Y Shen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Influence of lasalocid and monensin plus tylosin on comparative feeding value of steam-flaked versus dry-rolled corn in diets for feedlot cattle.

Authors:  R A Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Cross-sectional study examining Salmonella enterica carriage in subiliac lymph nodes of cull and feedlot cattle at harvest.

Authors:  Sara E Gragg; Guy H Loneragan; Mindy M Brashears; Terrance M Arthur; Joseph M Bosilevac; Norasak Kalchayanand; Rong Wang; John W Schmidt; J Chance Brooks; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Tyson R Brown; Thomas S Edrington; Dayna M Brichta-Harhay
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.171

9.  Effect of Feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on Hindgut Fermentation and Microbiota of Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  D J Song; H Y Kang; J Q Wang; H Peng; D P Bu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  1 in total

1.  Metaphylactic antimicrobial effects on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. measured longitudinally from feedlot arrival to harvest in high-risk beef cattle.

Authors:  Nathan S Long; James E Wells; Elaine D Berry; Jerrad F Legako; Dale R Woerner; Guy H Loneragan; Paul R Broadway; Jeff A Carroll; Nicole C Burdick Sanchez; Samodha C Fernando; Carley M Bacon; Cory L Helmuth; Taylor M Smock; Jeff L Manahan; Ashley A Hoffman; Kristin E Hales
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.