Literature DB >> 35953238

Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.

Luke K Fuerniss1, Kelly K Kreikemeier2, Lynn D Reed3, Matt D Cravey3, Bradley J Johnson1.   

Abstract

As commercial fed cattle consume large amounts of concentrate feedstuffs, hindgut health can be challenged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a commercially available Bacillus feed additive on cattle health outcomes and cecal microbiota of fed cattle at the time of harvest. Commercial cattle from a single feedlot were identified for characterization of cecal microbial communities using 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequencing. All cattle were fed a common corn-based finishing diet. Control cattle (CON) were administered no treatment while treated cattle (TRT) were supplemented daily with 0.050 g of MicroSaf 4C 40 (2 billion colony forming units of Bacillus spp.; Phileo by Lesaffre, Milwaukee, WI). Immediately after harvest and evisceration, the cecal contents of cattle were sampled. After DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing, reads from CON samples (N = 12) and TRT samples (N = 12) were assigned taxonomy using the SILVA 138 database. Total morbidity, first treatment of atypical interstitial pneumonia, and early shipments for harvest were decreased among TRT cattle compared to CON cattle (P ≤ 0.021). On average, cecal microbiota from TRT cattle had greater alpha diversity than microbiota from CON cattle as measured by Shannon diversity, Pielou's evenness, and feature richness (P < 0.010). Additionally, TRT microbial communities were different (P = 0.001) and less variable (P < 0.001) than CON microbial communities when evaluated by unweighted UniFrac distances. By relative abundance across all samples, the most prevalent phyla were Firmicutes (55.40%, SD = 15.97) and Bacteroidetes (28.17%, SD = 17.74) followed by Proteobacteria (6.75%, SD = 10.98), Spirochaetes (4.54%, SD = 4.85), and Euryarchaeota (1.77%, SD = 3.00). Spirochaetes relative abundance in TRT communities was greater than that in CON communities and was differentially abundant between treatments by ANCOM testing (W = 11); Monoglobaceae was the only family-level taxon identified as differentially abundant (W = 59; greater mean relative abundance in TRT group by 2.12 percentage points). Half (N = 6) of the CON samples clustered away from all other samples based on principal coordinates and represented cecal dysbiosis among CON cattle. The results of this study indicated that administering a four-species blend of Bacillus positively supported the cecal microbial communities of finishing cattle. Further research is needed to explore potential mechanisms of action of Bacillus DFM products in feedlot cattle.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Bacilluszzm321990 ; 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid; cecum; feedlot

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35953238      PMCID: PMC9576023          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  73 in total

1.  Microbial community profiles of the jejunum from steers differing in feed efficiency.

Authors:  P R Myer; J E Wells; T P L Smith; L A Kuehn; H C Freetly
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bringing the Dynamic Microbiome to Life with Animations.

Authors:  Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Antonio Gonzalez; Larry Smarr; Daniel McDonald; James T Morton; Jose A Navas-Molina; Rob Knight
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 21.023

4.  The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.

Authors:  Christina B Welch; Jeferson M Lourenco; Dylan B Davis; Taylor R Krause; Mia N Carmichael; Michael J Rothrock; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Bacillus subtilis PB6 Supplementation in Weaned Holstein Steers During an Experimental Salmonella Challenge.

Authors:  Paul R Broadway; Jeffery A Carroll; Nicole C Burdick Sanchez; Todd R Callaway; Sara D Lawhon; Elana V Gart; Laura K Bryan; David J Nisbet; Heather D Hughes; Jerrad F Legako; Debra L O'Connor; Jerilyn E Hergenreder; P Whitney Rounds
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 6.  Mechanisms of inflammation-driven bacterial dysbiosis in the gut.

Authors:  M Y Zeng; N Inohara; G Nuñez
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.313

7.  Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Insights into the Role of Erysipelotrichaceae in the Human Host.

Authors:  Nadeem O Kaakoush
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Comparative studies of the composition of bacterial microbiota associated with the ruminal content, ruminal epithelium and in the faeces of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Jun-hua Liu; Meng-ling Zhang; Rui-yang Zhang; Wei-yun Zhu; Sheng-yong Mao
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.