Literature DB >> 25046402

Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning.

Gabriele Wulf1, Suzete Chiviacowsky2, Priscila Lopes Cardozo2.   

Abstract

Two factors that have been shown to facilitate motor learning are autonomy support (AS) and enhanced expectancies (EE) for performance. We examined the individual and combined influences of these factors. In a 2 × 2 design, participants learning a novel motor skill (throwing with the non-dominant arm) were or were not provided a choice (AS) about the ball color on each of 6 10-trial blocks during practice, and were or were not given bogus positive social-comparative feedback (EE). This resulted in four groups: AS/EE, AS, EE, and C (control). One day after the practice phase, participants completed 10 retention and 10 transfer trials. The distance to the target--a bull's eye with a 1m radius and 10 concentric circles--was 7.5m during practice and retention, and 8.5m during transfer. Autonomy support and enhanced expectancies had additive advantages for learning, with both main effects being significant for retention and transfer. On both tests, the AS/EE group showed the greatest throwing accuracy. Also, the accuracy scores of the AS and EE groups were higher than those of the C group. Furthermore, self-efficacy measured after practice and before retention and transfer was increased by both AS and EE. Thus, supporting learners' need for autonomy by given them a small choice--even though it was not directly related to task performance--and enhancing their performance expectancies appeared to independently influence learning.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundamental psychological needs; Motivation; Self-controlled practice; Self-efficacy; Throwing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25046402     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Financial incentives enhance adaptation to a sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Kathrin Gajda; Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.

Authors:  Rebecca Lewthwaite; Suzete Chiviacowsky; Ricardo Drews; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

4.  Skilled Throwing Performance: A Test of the OPTIMAL Theory.

Authors:  Jacquelyn V L Sertic; Jason M Avedesian; James W Navalta
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Different Patterns of Neural Activity Characterize Motor Skill Performance During Acquisition and Retention.

Authors:  Dorsa Beroukhim-Kay; Bokkyu Kim; John Monterosso; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee Winstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Relatedness support enhances motor learning.

Authors:  Daniela H Gonzalez; Suzete Chiviacowsky
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-10

7.  Motivational state, reward value, and Pavlovian cues differentially affect skilled forelimb grasping in rats.

Authors:  Alice C Mosberger; Larissa de Clauser; Hansjörg Kasper; Martin E Schwab
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Self-Control of Haptic Assistance for Motor Learning: Influences of Frequency and Opinion of Utility.

Authors:  Camille K Williams; Victrine Tseung; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Inducing illusory control ensures persistence when rewards fade and when others outperform us.

Authors:  Bettina Studer; Shawn N Geniole; Maike L Becker; Christoph Eisenegger; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

Review 10.  Psychosocial Modulators of Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Petra Zemankova; Ovidiu Lungu; Martin Bares
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.