Literature DB >> 2504357

Randomised trial of two strategies offering women mobile screening for breast cancer.

E M Williams1, M P Vessey.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2504357      PMCID： PMC1837026          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.299.6692.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Cervical cytology screening: a comparison of two call systems.

Authors:  A Wilson; A Leeming
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-07-18

2.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321
  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  The Italian health surveillance (SiVeAS) prioritization approach to reduce chronic disease risk factors.

Authors:  Eduardo J Simoes; Sergio Mariotti; Alessandra Rossi; Alicia Heim; Felipe Lobello; Ali H Mokdad; Emanuele Scafato
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Health checks in general practice: a comparison of two invitation letters.

Authors:  P Norman; M T Conner; D G Willits; D R Bailey; D H Hood; H L Coysh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Colorectal cancer prevention. An approach to increasing compliance in a faecal occult blood test screening programme.

Authors:  A R Hart; J Eaden; S Barnett; A M de Bono; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  An economic view of high compliance as a screening objective.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; C Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

6.  Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.

Authors:  S F Hurley; R M Huggins; D J Jolley; D Reading
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Recruitment methods for screening programmes: trial of a new method within a regional osteoporosis study.

Authors:  M J Garton; D J Torgerson; C Donaldson; I T Russell; D M Reid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-11

8.  Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.

Authors:  M Orton; R Fitzpatrick; A Fuller; D Mant; C Mlynek; M Thorogood
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Randomised trial investigating the relationship of response rate for blood sample donation to site of biospecimen collection, fasting status and reminder letter: the 45 and Up Study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Nicol Herbert; Kris Rogers; Tanya Mather; Louisa Jorm
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.