Literature DB >> 1777275

Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.

M Orton1, R Fitzpatrick, A Fuller, D Mant, C Mlynek, M Thorogood.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted to study the impact of women's previous experiences of breast cancer screening on their subsequent readiness to reattend. Women aged 45-64 years from three general practices were invited to attend for a second breast cancer screening test at a mobile clinic. Of the 1582 women who were invited, 1408 (89.0%) reattended. A questionnaire about their experience of the previous screening test was completed by 641 women who attended and 124 who did not attend the second test. Twenty six per cent of the women had found the previous test painful, and a minority also reported embarrassment (7%) or distress (6%). Women who did not reattend were significantly more likely than those who did to report the previous screening test as embarrassing or distressing and were significantly less likely to have found the clinic staff helpful or attendance for screening worthwhile or reassuring. No significant difference was found in the reattendance rate of women who had experienced a false positive result at the previous screening test compared with the remaining women. These results show that there may be substantial scope for reducing non-attendance by improving the way the service is provided, thereby enhancing the overall impact of breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1777275      PMCID: PMC1371753     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  17 in total

1.  Compliance with breast cancer screening achieved by the Aylesbury Vale mobile service (1984-1988).

Authors:  E M Williams; M P Vessey
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1990-02

2.  Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years.

Authors:  M M Roberts; F E Alexander; T J Anderson; U Chetty; P T Donnan; P Forrest; W Hepburn; A Huggins; A E Kirkpatrick; J Lamb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-02-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Attenders and non-attenders at a breast screening clinic: a comparative study.

Authors:  S M Hunt; F Alexander; M M Roberts
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 5.  Participation in breast screening programs: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon; E A Laville; G L Jackson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A pilot study of attendance for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  A Eardley; A Elkind
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Is mammography painful? A multicenter patient survey.

Authors:  P C Stomper; D B Kopans; N L Sadowsky; M R Sonnenfeld; C A Swann; R S Gelman; J E Meyer; M S Jochelson; M S Hunt; P D Allen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-03

8.  Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography.

Authors:  J Kruse; D M Phillips
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  F de Waard; H J Collette; J J Rombach; E A Baanders-van Halewijn; C Honing
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

10.  Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves.

Authors:  P Hobbs; A Smith; W D George; R A Sellwood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  12 in total

1.  Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among Chinese Canadian women.

Authors:  T G Hislop; M Deschamps; C Teh; C Jackson; S P Tu; Y Yasui; S M Schwartz; A Kuniyuki; V Taylor
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

2.  Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  J Cockburn; P Schofield; V White; D Hill; I Russell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention.

Authors:  D R Rutter; M Calnan; M S Vaile; S Field; K A Wade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

4.  The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Carol P Somkin; Stephen J McPhee; Tung Nguyen; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Correlation Between a Numerical Rating Scale of Patient Satisfaction With Current Management of an Upper Extremity Disorder and a General Measure of Satisfaction With the Medical Visit.

Authors:  Marijn M G van Berckel; Niels H Bosma; Michiel G J S Hageman; David Ring; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-08-19

6.  Assessment of participant satisfaction with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in South Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Sun Mi Lim; Mi Ah Han; Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Son Choi; Myung-Il Hahm; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.

Authors:  Glen B Taksler; Nancy L Keating; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway.

Authors:  K Løken; S Steine; E Laerum
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

9.  Mammography screening of women in their 40s: impact of changes in screening guidelines.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Albert Sun; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth B Claus; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Are health-care relationships important for mammography adherence in Latinas?

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Judy Wang; Bin Yi; Toni Michelle Harrison; Shibao Feng; Elmer E Huerta; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.