Leo K Tam1, Gigi Galiana1, Jason P Stockmann2, Hemant Tagare1,3,4, Dana C Peters1, R Todd Constable1,4,5. 1. Yale University, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 2. Massachusetts General Hospital Martinos Center for Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Yale University, Department of Electrical Engineering, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 4. Yale University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 5. Yale University, Department of Neurosurgery, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nonlinear spatial encoding magnetic (SEM) field strategies such as O-space imaging have previously reported dispersed artifacts during accelerated scans. Compressed sensing (CS) has shown a sparsity-promoting convex program allows image reconstruction from a reduced data set when using the appropriate sampling. The development of a pseudo-random center placement (CP) O-space CS approach optimizes incoherence through SEM field modulation to reconstruct an image with reduced error. THEORY AND METHODS: The incoherence parameter determines the sparsity levels for which CS is valid and the related transform point spread function measures the maximum interference for a single point. The O-space acquisition is optimized for CS by perturbing the Z(2) strength within 30% of the nominal value and demonstrated on a human 3T scanner. RESULTS: Pseudo-random CP O-space imaging is shown to improve incoherence between the sensing and sparse domains. Images indicate pseudo-random CP O-space has reduced mean squared error compared with a typical linear SEM field acquisition method. CONCLUSION: Pseudo-random CP O-space imaging, with a nonlinear SEM field designed for CS, is shown to reduce mean squared error of images at high acceleration over linear encoding methods for a 2D slice when using an eight channel circumferential receiver array for parallel imaging.
PURPOSE: Nonlinear spatial encoding magnetic (SEM) field strategies such as O-space imaging have previously reported dispersed artifacts during accelerated scans. Compressed sensing (CS) has shown a sparsity-promoting convex program allows image reconstruction from a reduced data set when using the appropriate sampling. The development of a pseudo-random center placement (CP) O-space CS approach optimizes incoherence through SEM field modulation to reconstruct an image with reduced error. THEORY AND METHODS: The incoherence parameter determines the sparsity levels for which CS is valid and the related transform point spread function measures the maximum interference for a single point. The O-space acquisition is optimized for CS by perturbing the Z(2) strength within 30% of the nominal value and demonstrated on a human 3T scanner. RESULTS: Pseudo-random CP O-space imaging is shown to improve incoherence between the sensing and sparse domains. Images indicate pseudo-random CP O-space has reduced mean squared error compared with a typical linear SEM field acquisition method. CONCLUSION: Pseudo-random CP O-space imaging, with a nonlinear SEM field designed for CS, is shown to reduce mean squared error of images at high acceleration over linear encoding methods for a 2D slice when using an eight channel circumferential receiver array for parallel imaging.
Authors: Gilles Puy; Jose P Marques; Rolf Gruetter; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Dimitri Van De Ville; Pierre Vandergheynst; Yves Wiaux Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Walter R T Witschey; Chris A Cocosco; Daniel Gallichan; Gerrit Schultz; Hans Weber; Anna Welz; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gigi Galiana; Jason P Stockmann; Leo Tam; Dana Peters; Hemant Tagare; R Todd Constable Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 0.481
Authors: Daniel Gallichan; Chris A Cocosco; Andrew Dewdney; Gerrit Schultz; Anna Welz; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jason P Stockmann; Gigi Galiana; Leo Tam; Christoph Juchem; Terence W Nixon; R Todd Constable Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Haifeng Wang; Leo Tam; Emre Kopanoglu; Dana C Peters; R Todd Constable; Gigi Galiana Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Li Feng; Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Hersh Chandarana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813