Eddy Solomon1, Gilad Liberman1, Noam Nissan1,2, Lucio Frydman1. 1. Department of Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 2. Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evaluate the usefulness of single-shot and of interleaved spatiotemporally encoded (SPEN) methods to perform diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) under various preclinical and clinical settings. METHODS: A formalism for analyzing SPEN DTI data is presented, tailored to account for the spatially dependent b-matrix weightings introduced by the sequence's use of swept pulses acting while in the presence of field gradients. Using these b-matrix calculations, SPEN's ability to deliver DTI measurements was tested on phantoms as well as ex vivo and in vivo. In the latter case, DTI involved scans on mice brains and on human lactating breasts. RESULTS: For both ex vivo and in vivo investigations, SPEN data proved less sensitive to distortions arising from Bo field inhomogeneities and from eddy currents, than conventional single-shot alternatives. Further resolution enhancement could be achieved using referenceless methods for interleaved SPEN data acquisitions. CONCLUSION: The robustness of SPEN-based sequences vis-à-vis field instabilities and heterogeneities, enables the implementation of DTI experiments with good sensitivity and resolution even in challenging environments in both preclinical and clinical settings. Magn Reson Med 77:1124-1133, 2017.
PURPOSE: Evaluate the usefulness of single-shot and of interleaved spatiotemporally encoded (SPEN) methods to perform diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) under various preclinical and clinical settings. METHODS: A formalism for analyzing SPEN DTI data is presented, tailored to account for the spatially dependent b-matrix weightings introduced by the sequence's use of swept pulses acting while in the presence of field gradients. Using these b-matrix calculations, SPEN's ability to deliver DTI measurements was tested on phantoms as well as ex vivo and in vivo. In the latter case, DTI involved scans on mice brains and on human lactating breasts. RESULTS: For both ex vivo and in vivo investigations, SPEN data proved less sensitive to distortions arising from Bo field inhomogeneities and from eddy currents, than conventional single-shot alternatives. Further resolution enhancement could be achieved using referenceless methods for interleaved SPEN data acquisitions. CONCLUSION: The robustness of SPEN-based sequences vis-à-vis field instabilities and heterogeneities, enables the implementation of DTI experiments with good sensitivity and resolution even in challenging environments in both preclinical and clinical settings. Magn Reson Med 77:1124-1133, 2017.
Authors: David S Tuch; Timothy G Reese; Mette R Wiegell; Nikos Makris; John W Belliveau; Van J Wedeen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Antti M Airaksinen; Juha-Pekka Niskanen; Ryan Chamberlain; Joanna K Huttunen; Jari Nissinen; Michael Garwood; Asla Pitkänen; Olli Gröhn Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Wolfgang Bogner; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Hubert Bickel; Marek Chmelik; Michael Weber; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig; Stephan Gruber Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Luis M Colon-Perez; Michael King; Mansi Parekh; Angelique Boutzoukas; Eduardo Carmona; Michelle Couret; Rosemary Klassen; Thomas H Mareci; Paul R Carney Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Maxime Yon; João P de Almeida Martins; Qingjia Bao; Matthew D Budde; Lucio Frydman; Daniel Topgaard Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 4.044