Literature DB >> 9498603

Ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in MRI.

O Ocali1, E Atalar.   

Abstract

A method to calculate the ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a magnetic resonance experiment for a point inside an arbitrarily shaped object is presented. The ultimate intrinsic SNR is determined by body noise. A solution is obtained by optimizing the electromagnetic field to minimize total power deposition while maintaining a constant right-hand circularly polarized component of the magnetic field at the point of interest. A numerical approximation for the optimal field is found by assuming a superposition of a large number of plane waves. This simulation allowed estimation of the ultimate intrinsic SNR attainable in a human torso model. The performance of six coil configurations was evaluated by comparing the SNR of images obtained by the coils with the ultimate values. In addition, the behavior of ultimate intrinsic SNR was investigated as a function of main field strength. It was found that the ultimate intrinsic SNR increases better than linearly with the main magnetic field up to 10 T for our model. It was observed that for field strengths of 4 T or higher, focusing is required to reach the ultimate intrinsic SNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9498603     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  49 in total

1.  An analytical SMASH procedure (ASP) for sensitivity-encoded MRI.

Authors:  R F Lee; C R Westgate; R G Weiss; P A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Cardiovascular MRI probes for the outside in and for the inside out.

Authors:  P A Bottomley; E Atalar; R F Lee; K A Shunk; A Lardo
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison.

Authors:  O Gonen; S Gruber; B S Li; V Mlynárik; E Moser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Lumped-element planar strip array (LPSA) for parallel MRI.

Authors:  Ray F Lee; Christopher J Hardy; Daniel K Sodickson; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Cardiac chamber quantification using magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla--a pilot study.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Tobias Frauenrath; Marcel Prothmann; Matthias A Dieringer; Fabian Hezel; Wolfgang Renz; Kerstin Kretschel; Thoralf Niendorf; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Optimizing the intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio of MRI strip detectors.

Authors:  Ananda Kumar; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Massively parallel MRI detector arrays.

Authors:  Boris Keil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Performance evaluation of a 32-element head array with respect to the ultimate intrinsic SNR.

Authors:  Riccardo Lattanzi; Aaron K Grant; Jonathan R Polimeni; Michael A Ohliger; Graham C Wiggins; Lawrence L Wald; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  Numerical field calculations considering the human subject for engineering and safety assurance in MRI.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.