Peter Greaves1, Luc Chouinard2, Heinrich Ernst3, Lars Mecklenburg4, Ingrid M Pruimboom-Brees5, Matthias Rinke6, Susanne Rittinghausen3, Stéphane Thibault7, Jasmin Von Erichsen8, Toshinori Yoshida9. 1. University of Leicester, Department of Cancer Studies, Leicester, UK. 2. Charles River Laboratories, Quebec, Canada. 3. Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany. 4. European Advanced Risk Assessor, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. 6. Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany. 7. Pfizer Inc, California, USA. 8. Nycomed: a Takeda Company, Barsbuettel, Germany. 9. The Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Ibaraki, Japan.
Abstract
The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP), and North America (STP) to develop an internationally accepted nomenclature for proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in laboratory animals. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature for classifying lesions observed in the soft tissues including skeletal muscle as well as the mesothelium of rats and mice. The standardized nomenclature of lesions presented in this document is also available electronically on the Internet (http://www.goreni.org/). Sources of material included histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world. Content includes spontaneous developmental and aging lesions as well as those induced by exposure to test materials. A widely accepted and utilized international harmonization of nomenclature for lesions in soft tissues, skeletal muscle and mesothelium in laboratory animals will decrease confusion among regulatory and scientific research organizations in different countries and provide a common language to increase and enrich international exchanges of information among toxicologists and pathologists. (DOI: 10.1293/tox.26.1S; J Toxicol Pathol 2013; 26: 1S-26S).
The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP), and North America (STP) to develop an internationally accepted nomenclature for proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in laboratory animals. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature for classifying lesions observed in the soft tissues including skeletal muscle as well as the mesothelium of rats and mice. The standardized nomenclature of lesions presented in this document is also available electronically on the Internet (http://www.goreni.org/). Sources of material included histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world. Content includes spontaneous developmental and aging lesions as well as those induced by exposure to test materials. A widely accepted and utilized international harmonization of nomenclature for lesions in soft tissues, skeletal muscle and mesothelium in laboratory animals will decrease confusion among regulatory and scientific research organizations in different countries and provide a common language to increase and enrich international exchanges of information among toxicologists and pathologists. (DOI: 10.1293/tox.26.1S; J Toxicol Pathol 2013; 26: 1S-26S).
The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology
from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP) and North America (STP) to develop an
internationally-accepted nomenclature for proliferative and non-proliferative lesions in
laboratory animals. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized
nomenclature for classifying proliferative and non-proliferative lesions observed in soft
tissues of laboratory rats and mice. Standardized nomenclature of proliferative and
non-proliferative lesions of the soft tissues of both rats and mice has been previously
published by the STP ([50]Greaves et al.
1992; [51]Greaves and Seely 1996; [48]Greaves et al. 2000). These were subject to
extensive reviews and comments by members of STP and were used as the basis for the WHO -
International Agency for Research on Cancer classification of tumors in mice and rats
([16]Carlton et al. 1992; [34]Ernst et al. 2001). These STP publications have
been used for this current classification. The standardized nomenclature of lesions
presented here is also available electronically at the goRENI website (www.goreni.org). This
document follows a similar approach to these previous publications.The basic principles for recording microscopic changes in toxicity studies have been
recently summarized ([73]Mann et al. 2012).
In these studies microscopic observations should be recorded in a consistent and objective
manner. Descriptive rather than diagnostic terminology is advisable in order to avoid
misleading comparisons with particular diseases.The conventional view of the soft tissues is one of a cellular component comprising
fibroblasts, fat containing cells, specialized skeletal muscle fibers, a matrix of ground
substance and various structural proteins including collagen and elastic fibers. These are
accompanied by blood vessels and mobile bone-marrow derived cells such as lymphocytes,
granular leukocytes and macrophages. This simple concept must now be modified since the
discovery of mesenchymal stem cells and their important contribution to tissue homeostasis
([114]Valtieri and Sorrentino 2008).
These cells are undifferentiated multi-potential cells which reside primarily in the bone
marrow but also in other sites including adipose tissue and skeletal muscle ([69]Liu et al. 2009). They are now believed to be
important in the functional repair of damaged tissues. Moreover, they have been found to
have a central role in the pathogenesis and progression of neoplasia as part of the
non-malignant supporting stroma ([114]Valtieri and Sorrentino 2008).For convenience, mesothelial lesions are also reviewed in this document. Mesothelial cells
are derived from the mesoderm but express many epithelial characteristics. They do not
regenerate in the same way as epithelial cells although the exact mechanisms involved
following injury remain uncertain ([82]Mutsaers et al. 2007). Lesions of the synovium are discussed under the
INHAND classification of lesions of the skeletal system.The pathological features of both spontaneous and induced conditions of soft tissues are
similar among different laboratory rodent species as well as humans. Hence, the basic
classification developed for mesenchymal lesions can be used for all species, although the
range of soft tissue neoplasms described in rodents is far less than those characterized in
humans. Nevertheless unusual types of mesenchymal neoplasms are encountered that do not fit
into the usual classification scheme.Careful recording of the nature, intensity and duration of the inflammatory response of the
soft tissues to implanted or injected substances is important in the assessment of the local
tolerability of agents intended for contact with human tissues. The chemical and physical
properties of injected chemicals or vaccines and their adjuvants as well as size, shape and
surface texture of implanted biomaterials may modify the histological features and temporal
pattern of the inflammatory and reparative responses ([123]Williams 1987; [4]Anderson and Langone 1999; [115]Verdier et al. 2005; [27]Dincer et al. 2006).
The distribution of lesions of smooth muscle generally parallels the normal distribution
of smooth muscle in the body so that lesions occur mostly in the female genital tract, the
gastrointestinal tract and skin but only rarely in deep soft tissue. However, it has been
shown that adipose tissue may have an important paracrine function in smooth muscle cell
proliferation in blood vessels ([79]Miao
and Li 2012). In soft tissues, particularly in inflammatory processes, smooth muscle cells
may be difficult to distinguish from myofibroblasts. They both express smooth muscle actin
but smooth muscle cells usually contain desmin ([62]Kempson et al. 2001).• Hyperplasia, smooth muscle
Skeletal muscle
Whilst skeletal muscle contains a similar range of connective tissue elements as the
other soft tissues, its bulk is predominantly composed of highly specialized skeletal
muscle cells or fibers (myocytes). These cells form a syncytium by fusion of fetal
myoblasts to produce a muscle fiber whose length is often many thousand times greater than
its diameter. Although the principles of pathological changes are similar in muscle to
other tissues of the body, its unusual cellular structure and its contractile nature give
rise to a constellation of pathological changes that need to be considered separately. The
general system of nomenclature of rodent skeletal muscle fiber types is based on the
adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) reaction ([12]Brooke and Kaiser 1970; [13]Brooke et al. 1971). When this reaction is performed at pH 9.4, type I
or slow twitch fibers show low myofibrillar ATPase activity. Type II or fast twitch fibers
show greater ATPase reactivity and can be divided into type IIA, IIB and IIC on the basis
of inhibition of the reaction at lower values of pH. Thus, in the rat type IIA fibers are
inhibited at pH 4.5, type IIB at pH 4.3 and type IIC at pH 3.9. Immunocytochemical
techniques based on the fast and slow isoforms of myosin have also been used and correlate
reasonably well with fiber type analysis from the standard ATPase method and are
applicable to fixed material ([6]Behan et
al. 2002; [120]Westwood et al. 2005).This heterogeneity as well as the fact that muscle represents nearly 40% of body mass has
to be considered in the selection of muscle sampling for histopathological examination.
Over recent years study of the muscle damage produced in rodents by lipid regulating drugs
notably the fibrates and statins have shown that muscle fiber types vary in their
sensitivity to xenobiotics ([97]Schaefer
et al. 2004; [120]Westwood et al. 2005;
[26]De Souza et al. 2006; [84]Okada et al. 2007; [37]Faiola et al. 2008; [122]Westwood et al. 2008; [85]Okada et al. 2009). It is important therefore to include both type 1 and
type II fibers for histological assessment. For example the soleus represents a type
I-predominant skeletal muscle whereas type II-predominant skeletal muscles are represented
by the quadriceps and extensor digitorum longus.• Infiltrate, inflammatory cell• Necrosis• Inflammation• Hypertrophy• Atrophy• Degeneration• Vacuolation• MineralizationMesothelium• Hyperplasia
Neoplastic proliferative lesions
One diagnostic challenge in the assessment of soft tissue pathology is making a
distinction between reactive, but self-limiting conditions and neoplastic lesions of
mesenchymal cells. Soft tissue tumors are classified according to the adult tissue they
resemble. However, they most probably develop from pluripotential mesenchymal cells that
are able to differentiate in one or more different directions. For this reason a close
histogenetic relationship exists between soft tissue neoplasms and bone tumors ([54]Hajdu 1986). It explains why mixed
differentiation patterns occur among soft tissue sarcomas such as reported in some
transgenic mouse models ([41]Floyd et al.
2002).Mesenchymal tumors are relatively uncommon spontaneous lesions in conventional strains of
rats and mice, although their incidence in aged untreated animals may vary from less than
1% to over 5% ([49]Greaves and Faccini
1981; [91]Poteracki and Walsh 1998;
[32]Eiben 2001; [53]Haines et al. 2001; [28]Dinse et al. 2010). The most common malignant
phenotype that develops spontaneously is usually fibrosarcoma or its pleomorphic variant
(malignant fibrous histiocytoma).Sarcomas can also be induced in rodents by injection of oncogenic viruses and carcinogens
such as 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene as well as repeated injection of a
diverse range of non-genotoxic chemicals ([19]Chesterman et al. 1966; [44]Grasso and Goldberg 1966a, [45]b; [58]Hooson et al.
1973; [107]Taguchi et al. 2006).
Implantation into rodents of impervious solid foreign bodies made from a wide variety of
materials also induces sarcomas in the surrounding tissues. Materials include polystyrene,
cellophane, polyethylene, polyurethane, polyvinylchloride, polymethylmethacrylate,
silicone, glass, aluminium oxide and metals such as stainless steel, gold, platinum,
titanium, nickel, chromium ([88]Oppenheimer et al. 1964; [11]Brand et al. 1976; [63]Kirkpatrick et al. 2000). Implantation of spent uranium fragments also
induces sarcomas ([52]Hahn et al. 2002).
There are species and strain differences in the sensitivity of rodents to the induction of
sarcomas by foreign bodies, the heterozygous transgenic p53+/− being
particularly sensitive ([8]Blanchard et al.
1999). Again the main induced type of neoplasm is fibrosarcoma or its pleomorphic variant
although other types are also reported. Sarcomas developing around implants appear to be
very rare in humans ([80]Morgan and Elcock
1995; [61]Keegan et al. 2008).Most of these rodent neoplasms can be diagnosed by the use of routine hematoxylin and
eosin stained sections, although immunocytochemistry can be used to characterize cell
types more accurately. In the diagnosis of human soft tissue sarcomas, immunocytochemistry
now has an important place. It has been shown that this can assist in the
sub-categorization of pleomorphic sarcomas and the assessment of prognosis and proper
planning of therapy ([21]Coindre et al.
2001; [111]Tos 2006). However, in rodents
the diversity of tumor types is far more limited. A recent study of a large number of
fibrosarcomas and liposarcomas induced in different studies by peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor agonists in rats immunohistochemistry was relatively
unhelpful in the characterization and grouping of these tumors for the purpose of safety
assessment ([55]Hardisty et al. 2007).• Fibroma• Fibrosarcoma• Fibrosarcoma, pleomorphic• Lipoma• Hibernoma• Liposarcoma• Rhabdomyoma: There is no fully substantiated report of rhabdomyoma occurring in
laboratory rats or mice.• Rhabdomyosarcoma• Leiomyoma• Leiomyosarcoma• Mesenchymoma, malignant• Sarcoma, NOS (Not otherwise specified)• Mesothelioma, malignant
Infiltrate, inflammatory cell (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: AggregateModifiers: Mononuclear cell, Lymphocyte, Neutrophil, Eosinophil, Plasma cell,
Polymorphonuclear cell, Mixed cell.Pathogenesis: May be a normal physiological appearance.Diagnostic features• Small foci of mononuclear cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells or polymorphonuclear
cells.• No evidence of tissue damage.Comment: These descriptive terms are applied to localized accumulations of lymphocytic,
mononuclear or polymorphonuclear (neutrophils or eosinophils) cells that do not constitute
evidence of a significant inflammatory process. They may be considered within
physiological limits.
Inflammation (N) : Soft Tissue
(Figures 1, 2, 3)
Figure 1.
A) Lesion from the face of a Wistar rats with marked inflammation and abscess
formation and development of a fibrous capsule (H&E). The abscess contains much
cellular debris including gram positive bacteria seen in B) (Gram stain).
Figure 2.
Other examples of chronic inflammation in connective tissue. In A) there is a
dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed of mononuclear cells which occurred
in response to injected pigment seen here as black fragments. In B) the tissues show
no necrosis but contain a sparse scattering of chronic inflammatory cells with a
vascular proliferative response (H&E).
Figure 3.
Mesenteric fat from a C67Bl mouse fed a high fat diet. There is a granulomatous
inflammatory process in the fat with clusters of macrophages with lipid vacuoles and
brown lipofuscin pigment (H&E).
A) Lesion from the face of a Wistar rats with marked inflammation and abscess
formation and development of a fibrous capsule (H&E). The abscess contains much
cellular debris including gram positive bacteria seen in B) (Gram stain).Other examples of chronic inflammation in connective tissue. In A) there is a
dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed of mononuclear cells which occurred
in response to injected pigment seen here as black fragments. In B) the tissues show
no necrosis but contain a sparse scattering of chronic inflammatory cells with a
vascular proliferative response (H&E).Mesenteric fat from a C67Bl mouse fed a high fat diet. There is a granulomatous
inflammatory process in the fat with clusters of macrophages with lipid vacuoles and
brown lipofuscin pigment (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Abscess, Granulation tissue, GranulomaModifiers: Neutrophil (purulent), Lymphocyte (non-purulent), Eosinophil, Plasma cell,
Mononuclear cell, Mixed cell, Granulomatous.Pathogenesis: Non-specific response to injury.Diagnostic features• Infiltration of leukocytes into the extracellular matrix.• Often accompanied by edema and intravascular accumulation of leukocytes.• Can be associated with prominent in-growth of fibroblasts and blood vessels
(granulation tissue) typically in 2-3 days after injury.Granuloma• Represents a focal form of inflammation characterized by aggregates of histiocytes
often with epithelioid appearance seen in isolation.• May have a central zone of necrosis.• Sparse infiltrate of other cells such mononuclear cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes,
blood vessels and fibroblasts.Abscess• Neutrophils accumulate focally and show central cell lysis with accumulation of
cellular debris.• Fibrous capsule formation• Modifiers can be used to describe the most prominent character of the inflammatory
process:Neutrophil (purulent)• Infiltration of neutrophils predominates.Lymphocyte (non-purulent)• Infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages (mononuclear leukocytes) predominates.• Plasma cells may be prominent.Eosinophil• Infiltration of eosinophilic granulocytes predominates.Granulomatous• An inflammatory process involving a significant proportion of macrophages and other
mononuclear cells.• Macrophages might adopt an epithelioid phenotype or form foreign body type giant cells
(syncytia).• There may be a central zone of necrosis.• It may be surrounded by granulation tissue, blood vessels and fibroblasts.• May be surrounded by a fibrous capsuleDifferential diagnosesFibrosis and fibroplasia• A very limited number of leukocytes, predominately mononuclear cells, extracellular
collagen matrix not associated with active inflammation or a predominantly fibroblastic
response.Fibroma:• Dense, poorly cellular fibrous mass of well-differentiated fibroblasts, compressing
adjacent tissue; interwoven bands of mature collagen; rare mitotic figures; very little if
any leukocyte infiltration.Sarcoma, histiocytic:• Comprised of fairly uniform but large histiocytic cells with vesicular nuclei and may
show mitotic activity.Comment: It should be underlined that the term 'inflammation' should be limited to those
instances where there is evidence of a pathological inflammatory process. Descriptive
terms such as lymphocyte or neutrophil aggregates or infiltration should be applied to
localized accumulations of lymphocytic, monocytic or polymorphonuclear cells that may be
considered within physiological limits (see Infiltrate, inflammatory cell).Localized inflammatory processes in connective tissue usually develop as a consequence of
local trauma, ulceration of the overlying epithelium, infarction, injection or
implantation of foreign materials into soft tissues or their extravasation from blood
vessels. Systemic effects of xenobiotics may also occasionally result in damage to the
soft tissue without a local inciting cause being evident in the sections. Histological
features may be modified by the nature and duration of the damage and type of tissue
involved.Initially, tissue damage or necrosis is accompanied by variable amounts of hemorrhage and
edema and acute inflammatory cells, followed by mononuclear leukocytes. Within two or
three days there is proliferation of fibroblasts and angiogenesis which is the basis for
'granulation tissue'. Subsequently, fibroblasts synthesize significant amounts of collagen
usually reaching a peak by about the third week (fibroplasia). Remodeling of collagen
ultimately occurs to produce mature scar tissue possessing high tensile strength
(fibrosis).If the inflammatory process is prolonged, chronic inflammation characterized
predominantly by the presence of lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages develops. A
fibroblastic response may also be prominent. Activated fibroblasts acquire -smooth muscle
cell-like phenotype, often referred to as myofibroblasts. These not only synthesize and
deposit extracellular matrix but also have contractile properties mediated by -smooth
muscle actin organized in bundles of microfilament ([57]Hinz 2010).A foreign body reaction with giant cells, abscess or cyst formation may also develop.
Mineral can also be deposited at the site of injured tissue (dystrophic mineralization).
This is characterized by fine or coarse granular deposits staining intensely with
hematoxylin or positively with the von Kossa stain. Iron pigments (hemosiderin) may also
be found particularly in macrophages when hemorrhage has occurred.A granuloma represents a localized form of an inflammatory reaction in which the cells
are similar to those in the reparative phase of the inflammatory process but in which the
histiocytic component is predominant. The term granulomatous inflammation is used when
there is a predominance of histiocytes and macrophages often showing epithelioid features
or foreign body giant cell formation. They form as a local reaction to foreign materials
but also more widely in soft tissue in response to infectious agents or as an
immunological granulomatous inflammatory reaction. They may also develop as an expression
of altered function of cells of the monocyte/macrophage series ([121]Westwood et al. 1995).Whilst the basic inflammatory response is common to all forms of tissue injury, different
injected or implanted materiel may modify certain histological features. For instance,
smooth surfaced biomaterials may produce smaller fibrous capsules that textured implants
([123]Williams 1987; [90]Picha et al. 1990). Pure aluminiummetal
implants are reported to induce a narrow zone of necrosis, copper a more vascular response
and cobalt is associated with significant lymphoid infiltrates ([78]McNamara and Williams 1981).
Fibrosis (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Scar formation, SclerosisPathogenesis: Repair process after local tissue degeneration.Diagnostic features• Focal to focally extensive increase in extracellular collagen.• Low number of fibroblasts.• Collagen fibers are mostly arranged in long streams.• Collagen fibers replace specialized normal cutaneous adnexae.Differential diagnosesFibroma• Dense, poorly cellular fibrous mass of well-differentiated fibroblasts, compressing
adjacent tissue; interwoven bands of mature collagen; rare mitotic figures; very little if
any leukocyte infiltration.Fibrosarcoma• Very cellular, composed of abnormal pleomorphic fibroblastic cells showing high mitotic
activity.Inflammation• Infiltration of leukocytes predominates.fibroplasia• Cellular, containing numerous active fibroblasts which although may be plump, show no
atypical features.Comment: Fibrosis is usually but not always the end stage of a chronic inflammatory
process. In contrast to active inflammatory processes or neoplasia it is usually poorly
cellular.
Fibroplasia (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatPathogenesis: Active repair process after local tissue damage.Diagnostic features• Variable increase in extracellular stroma.• High number of proliferating, active plump but normal fibroblasts.Differential diagnosesFibrosis:• Poorly cellular fibrous tissue containing few fibroblasts; very little if any leukocyte
infiltration.Fibroma:• Dense, poorly cellular irregular fibrous mass of well-differentiated fibroblasts,
compressing adjacent tissue; interwoven bands of mature collagen; rare mitotic figures;
very little if any leukocyte infiltration.Fibrosarcoma• Very cellular, composed of abnormal pleomorphic fibroblastic cells showing high mitotic
activity.Inflammation:• Infiltration of leukocytes predominates.Comment: The term fibroplasia is used to denote the presence of abundant active,
fibroblasts. A fibroblastic response without significant inflammation has been reported in
the adipose tissues of rodents treated with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
agonists ([55]Hardisty et al. 2007;
[117]Waites et al. 2007).The differential diagnosis between an exaggerated fibroblastic response to tissue injury
and a mesenchymal tumor (fibroma or fibrosarcoma) is usually made on the basis of size and
growth pattern. Neoplasms are usually large and show evidence of nodularity with
compression and infiltration of local tissues and adjacent organs. Careful studies of the
biomaterial-induced sarcomas have shown a spectrum of change from non-neoplastic
fibroblastic proliferation to incipient sarcoma. These premalignant zones are
characterised by cellular and nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromasia and prominent nucleoli
that can be more easily identified by use of immunocytochemistry for proliferating cell
nuclear antigen ([63]Kirkpatrick et al.
2000).
Necrosis (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatPathogenesis: Cell death.Diagnostic features• Loss of cellular detail and loss of nuclei (coagulation necrosis).• Replacement by cellular debris (lytic necrosis).• Often associated with edema, hemorrhage, vascular congestion, infiltration of
leukocytes, accumulation of fibrin, formation of granulation tissue, cyst formation,
mineralization and deposition of iron pigment (hemosiderin).Differential diagnosesInflammation:• Infiltration of leukocytes predominates.
Mineralization (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: CalcificationPathogenesis: Local injury (dystrophic mineralization), or generalized mineral imbalance
(metastatic mineralization).Diagnostic features• Intracellular and/or extracellular deposition of fine or coarse irregularly shaped
granules staining intensely basophilic with hematoxylin.• May be associated with infiltration by macrophages (including giant cells), lymphocytes
and fibroblasts.• Stains with histochemical reactions for minerals (e.g. calcium).• Is mostly associated with other signs of injury (e.g. necrosis).Differential diagnosesOsseous Metaplasia:• Bone tissue may be diagnosed histologically.Comment: Mineral deposits can occur in the soft tissues (particularly the subcutis) of
rodents, either following local tissue injury (dystrophic mineralization) or under
circumstances that favour generalized mineralization. These include high dietary
calcium:phosphate ratio, treatments that mobilize body calcium stores or raise blood
calcium levels (metastatic mineralization) and chronic renal failure. When calcium balance
is disturbed, soft tissues most commonly affected in the rodents appear to be natural
localised trauma sites such as around the limbs and in breeding females' mammary
tissues.
Metaplasia (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatModifiers: Osseous, Cartilaginous typeDiagnostic features• Cartilage or bone structure, abnormally located within collagenous connective
tissue.• Often surrounded by granulation tissue.Osseous• Osteoid, calcified bone tissue and even bone marrow.Cartilaginous type• CartilageDifferential diagnosesMineralization• Intracellular or extracellular deposits of mineral, no cartilage or bone formation.Comment: Osseous metaplasia is a well-recognized phenomenon occurring in tissues affected
by a variety of pathologic processes notably ischemia, hematoma and chronic inflammation,
various degenerative and reparative changes as well as within neoplasms ([68]Liu et al. 2007).
Amyloid (N): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatPathogenesis: Accumulation of an insoluble protein with β-pleated sheet secondary
structure.Diagnostic features• Extracellular deposition of pale, amorphous, eosinophilic, hyaline material.• Compression of adjacent tissue may be present.• Can be associated with edema.Special techniques for diagnosis• Shows reddish metachromasia with crystal violet. Congo red stains amyloid orange-red
and shows apple-green dichroism in polarizing light.Differential diagnosesNecrosis with deposition of fibrin• Congo red staining is negative.Deposition of other proteinacous material: Hyaline, Mature collagen• Congo red staining is negative.Comment: In mice, amyloid deposits only occur when there is significant systemic amyloid
([36]Faccini et al. 1990). In general,
amyloidosis appears to be more common in aging CD-1mice, compared with other conventional
strains ([72]Majeed 1993).
Infiltrate, inflammatory cell (N): Adipose Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: AggregateModifiers: Mononuclear cell, Lymphocyte, Neutrophil, Eosinophil, Plasma cell,
Polymorphonuclea cell, Mixed cell.Pathogenesis: May be a normal physiological appearance.Diagnostic features• Small foci of mononuclear cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells or neutrophils.• No evidence of tissue damage.Comment: These descriptive terms are applied to localized accumulations of lymphocytic,
mononcytic or polymorphonuclear cells that do not constitute evidence of a significant
inflammatory process. They may be considered within physiological limits.
Inflammation (N): Adipose Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Abscess, Granulation tissue, Granuloma.Modifiers: Neutrophil (purulent), Lymphocyte (non-purulent), Eosinophil, Plasma cell,
Mononuclear cell, Mixed cell, Granulomatous.Pathogenesis: Non-specific response to injury.Diagnostic features• Infiltration of leukocytes among fat cells and extracellular matrix.• Often accompanied by edema and intravascular accumulation of leukocytes.• Can be associated with prominent in-growth of fibroblasts and blood vessels
(granulation tissue) in 2-3 days after injury.Comment: As in other tissue adipose tissue may be affected by a typical inflammatory
process which shows similar histological features (see soft tissue Inflammation).
(Figure 3)Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Steatitis, Obesity-associated inflammationPathogenesis: Response of adipose tissue to injury.Diagnostic features• Gross pathology: widespread small white or yellowish foci in adipose tissue.• Clusters of macrophages often with small lipid vacuoles in the cytoplasm (foam
cells).• Cholesterol clefts, surrounded by giant cells may occur.• Proliferation of blood vessels and connective tissue may occur.Special techniques for diagnosis• Presence of lipofuscin droplets (demonstrated by their autofluorescence): Lipofuscin is
acid fast and shows yellow autofluorescence in fluorescent light.Differential diagnosesLiposarcoma:• Shows histological features of malignancy such as pleomorphic spindle cells, mitotic
activity, necrosis and the presence of lipoblasts.Comment: Inflammatory processes may affect adipose tissue in a similar manner to the
other soft tissues (see Inflammation). In addition, some more specific forms of
inflammation may be seen. Obesity in rodents as well as humans has been associated with a
widespread focal form of inflammation in the adipose tissue, characterized by the presence
of macrophages ([118]Weisberg et al.
2003; [119]Wellen and Hotamisligil 2003;
[125]Xu et al. 2003). Another form of
generalized fat damage affecting adipose tissue in the rat termed 'steatitis' is believed
to be the result of accumulation of pigment as a result of phagocytosis of blood-borne or
interstitial reactive lipid molecules. It appears to develop as a result of vitamin E or
antioxidant deficiency. This may develop as a consequence of excess dietary
polyunsaturated fatty acids with a least three double bonds such as found in fish or
linseed oil ([25]Danse 1989).Focal damage to fat cells occurs under a variety of circumstances. Histologically,
evidence of necrosis may be lacking but there is often a sparse accumulation of
inflammatory cells including macrophages and giant cells. Clefts representing dissolved
rhomboidal cholesterol crystals may also be seen.
Necrosis (N): Adipose Tissue
(Figure 4)
Figure 4.
A) Mesenteric fat from a B6C3F1 mouse showing a large nodule of fat necrosis in
which the acellular necrotic fat cells can be seen surrounded by a thin rim of
poorly cellular connective tissues (H&E). Image by courtesy of the National
Toxicology Program. B) Subcutaneous tissue from a Wistar rat treated with a novel
drug that produced fat necrosis. This shows acute damage.
A) Mesenteric fat from a B6C3F1 mouse showing a large nodule of fatnecrosis in
which the acellular necroticfat cells can be seen surrounded by a thin rim of
poorly cellular connective tissues (H&E). Image by courtesy of the National
Toxicology Program. B) Subcutaneous tissue from a Wistar rat treated with a novel
drug that produced fatnecrosis. This shows acute damage.Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: FatnecrosisPathogenesis: Cell death.Diagnostic features• Loss of cellular detail and ghost-like appearance of fat cells.• May be associated with edema, hemorrhage, vascular congestion, infiltration of
leukocytes, accumulation of fibrin, formation of granulation tissue, cyst formation,
fibrosis and deposition of iron pigment (hemosiderin) or calcium.Differential diagnosesInflammation• Infiltration of leukocytes predominates.
Atrophy (N): Adipose Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Lipoatrophy, FatatrophyModifiers: Serous, MucoidDiagnostic features• Loss or reduction in size of fat cells.• May be increase in connective tissue or fibrous septa.• May show extracellular glycosaminoglycan (mucopolysaccharides)Differential diagnosesLipoma• Reduction in size of lipocytes is localised within the neoplasm and there is expansion
and compression of surrounding tissues.Comment: Loss of adipose tissue normally occurs under conditions where there is reduced
caloric intake or increased energy expenditure. Other forms of atrophy may also occur.
Loss of fat (lipoatrophy) in face, limbs, and abdominal subcutaneous region has been
reported in people infected with the human immunodeficiency virus who are receiving highly
active antiretroviral therapy ([40]Flint
et al. 2009; [101]Sevastianova et al.
2011). Analogous findings are reported in rodents ([92]Prot et al. 2006). Localized fatatrophy may also be related to
injected drugs such as insulin and corticosteroids as well as recurrent pressure and
inflammation of adipose tissue ([42]Garg
2004; [66]Larade et al. 2008). In
cachectic states pale staining amorphous extracellular glycosaminoglycan may become
visible in atrophic adipose tissue and this can be termed serous atrophy ([81]Munfus and Menke 2009).
Hyperplasia, adipose tissue (H): Adipose Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: Polymorphic adipose tissueDiagnostic features• Diffuse (or focal) increase of adipose tissue with macrovesiculation (white adipose
tissue) or microvesiculation (brown adipose tissue).• Can be associated with variable focal fibrosis or fibroblastic proliferation
(fibroplasia).• No compression of surrounding tissue.Differential diagnosesLipoma• Discrete rounded nodules of adipose tissue showing compression of the surrounding
stroma.Liposarcoma• Shows histological features of malignancy such as pleomorphic spindle cells, mitotic
activity, necrosis and the presence of lipoblasts.Comment: Hyperplasia of adipose tissue has been described in rodents following
administration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists and has been
attributed to a receptor-mediated pharmacodynamic process ([55]Hardisty et al. 2007; [117]Waites et al. 2007).
Hyperplasia, smooth muscle (H): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Poorly circumscribed areas or bundles of irregular or parallel smooth muscle
fibers.• Well-differentiated smooth muscle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, distinct cell
boundaries and cylindrical, blunt-ended or cigar-shaped nuclei.• Longitudinal myofibrils can be demonstrated in the cytoplasm using the phosphotungstic
acid-hematoxylin (PTAH) stain.Differential diagnosesLeiomyoma• Is composed of interlacing bundles and whorls of smooth muscle cells showing a nodular
growth pattern and compression of surrounding tissues.Comment: Hyperplasia of smooth muscle is typically reported in the walls of the uterus,
mesovarium, gastrointestinal tract or blood vessels in rodents rather than in soft tissues
per se ([43]Gopinath and Gibson
1987;[89] Parrott et al. 2001).
Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: AggregateModifiers: Mononuclear cell, Lymphocyte, Neutrophil, Eosinophil, Plasma cell,
Polymorphonuclear cell, Mixed cellPathogenesis: May be a normal physiological appearance.Diagnostic features• Small foci of mononuclear cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells or neutrophils.• No evidence of tissue damage.Comment: These descriptive terms are applied to localized accumulations of mononuclear
cells, polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells or mixed infiltrates that do not
constitute evidence of a significant inflammatory process. They may be considered within
physiological limits.
Necrosis (N)
(Figures 5 and 9): Skeletal Muscle
Figure 5.
Muscle showing the stereotypical necrosis and repair response four A) and 10 days
B) following a single injection of the local anesthetic lignocaine. Mineralisation
of muscle fibers is apparent at 10 days (H&E).
Figure 9.
Spontaneous focal muscle fiber necrosis in a 2 year old C57Bl mouse. An intact
muscle fiber is seen adjacent to a necrotic fiber with an early cellular response
(H&E).
Muscle showing the stereotypical necrosis and repair response four A) and 10 days
B) following a single injection of the local anesthetic lignocaine. Mineralisation
of muscle fibers is apparent at 10 days (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatPathogenesis: Response to injury.Diagnostic features• Necrosis, edema and hemorrhage.• Rounded, hyalinized fibers with pyknotic nuclei (first few hours),.• Loss of cross striations.• Fragmentation of muscle fibers (24 hours).• Polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltrate (peak at 1 to 2 days).• Infiltration of macrophages and proliferation of myoblasts, may form myotubules with
long chains of nuclei (day 3).• Regeneration of basophilic muscle fibers (day 5).• Repair complete (3 weeks).Differential diagnosesMyopathy (see Degeneration, Vacuolation)• Vacuolation of fibers or basophilic droplets or targetoid fibers with no or very little
inflammation.Comment: The characteristic process of muscle degeneration which leads to necrosis,
inflammation and repair is observed following the intramuscular injection of myotoxic
agents. Small amounts of localised fiber necrosis may even occur following injection of
innocuous substances including saline ([109]Thuilliez et al. 2009).In the first few hours following injection fibers become rounded and hyalinized with
pyknotic nuclei. Myofibers often exhibit focal or segmental necrosis because of their
length and multiple nuclei. Necrotic fibers are surrounded by variable degrees of
hemorrhage and edema. Within 24 hours affected fibers become overtly fragmented and
macrophages can be seen. By day three, lesions are composed of numerous infiltrating
macrophages accompanied by proliferating myoblasts which may form myotubules with long
chains of nuclei. After five days there are numerous regenerating muscle fibers
characterized by basophilic cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli.Satellite cells around intact muscle fibers in the region of necrotic muscle may also
show activation. Affected satellite cells show increased cytoplasmic volume and mitotic
activity and are separated from skeletal muscle fibers by an unusually wide space which
may contain prominent basal lamina.Finally, regenerating fibers subsequently enlarge and by three weeks after injury, the
muscle tissue becomes essentially normal although fibers may retain some central nuclei
([74]Manor and Sadeh 1989). Although
regeneration following local damage is surprisingly complete, muscle fibers may not
regenerate after severe, extensive or repeated damage and as a consequence fibrous
scarring may follow.Skeletal muscle degeneration and necrosis can occur after systemic exposure to a variety
of xenobiotic and different fiber types may be affected ([46]Greaves 2012). Type II or fast twitch fibers appear to be the
most sensitive to inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase
(statins) ([120]Westwood et al. 2005)
whereas type I fibers appear to be generally more sensitive to the adverse effects of
peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) agonists ([26]De Souza et al. 2006; [37]Faiola et al. 2008).
Inflammation (N): Skeletal Muscle
(Figure 5)Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Abscess, Granulation tissue, GranulomaModifiers: Neutrophil (purulent), Lymphocyte (non-purulent), Eosinophil, Plasma cell,
Mononuclear cell, Mixed cell, Granulomatous.Pathogenesis: Non-specific response to injury.Diagnostic features• Infiltration of leukocytes among muscle fibers and extracellular matrix.• Often accompanied by edema and intravascular accumulation of leukocytes.• Can be associated with prominent in-growth of fibroblasts and blood vessels
(granulation tissue) in 2-3 days after injury.Comment: As in other tissue skeletal muscle may be affected by a primary inflammatory
process associated with little or no overt necrosis.
Hypertrophy (N): Skeletal Muscle
Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Enlargement of muscle fibers.Comment: Hypertrophy of muscle fibers may be focal or diffuse. Focal compensatory
hypertrophy may occur in muscle showing atrophic alterations. Diffuse hypertrophy can
develop in response to increased exercise or as a response to prolonged excessive growth
factors such as growth hormone or growth-promoting xenobiotics ([93]Prysor-Jones and Jenkins 1980; [76]McClung et al. 2005). Growth hormone has been shown to affect
mainly type I fibers. Hypertrophy is characterized histologically by an increase in muscle
fiber diameter but this may be difficult to assess histologically without morphometric
analysis.
Atrophy (N): Skeletal Muscle
Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Denervation atrophy, disuse atrophy, nutritional atrophy, age-related
atrophy.Diagnostic features• Decreased muscle fiber size, presence of angulated fibers.• Replacement by adipose tissue.Differential diagnosesMyopathy (see Degeneration, Vacuolation):• Vacuolation, targetoid fibers or hyaline change.Comment: Atrophy of skeletal muscle may result from inactivity or cachexia as well as
primary degenerative processes originating in muscle fibers. It also occurs secondary to
denervation (denervation atrophy). These types of atrophy can be induced experimentally in
rodents. Moreover, atrophy of skeletal muscle occurs spontaneously in rats in advancing
age although whether the changes result from primary muscle degeneration or changes in the
nerve supply is disputed.The nature of an individual muscle fiber is determined by its innervation and as a
consequence all fibers supplied by an individual neuron are of the same type. The
distribution of fiber type varies between muscles. For instance the soleus muscle in the
F344 rat comprises over 80% of type I fibers whereas the extensor digitorum longus
contains mainly type II fibers ([31]Eddinger et al. 1985). Normally, different fibers are intermingled
randomly within a muscle. Consequently if a neurone supplying a muscle motor unit dies,
the muscle fibers supplied by that unit undergo atrophy and take on a characteristic
histological feature of denervation atrophy that of a compressed angular profile when seen
in cross section.Ultimately, surviving intramuscular axons form collateral branches which connect with
denervated fibers which then display histochemical characteristics of the type determined
by the new innervations ([6]Behan et al.
2002). A characteristic grouping of the fibers into homogeneous groups of fiber type
rather than the mosaic pattern of normal muscle develops following re-innervation
([13]Brooke et al. 1971). Furthermore,
if a neuron supplying the enlarged motor unit degenerates, atrophic fibers are more likely
to be grouped together and surviving fibers may undergo compensatory hypertrophy to give a
characteristic histological pattern of both atrophy and hypertrophy.Atrophy from non-neurogenic causes such as those induced by the administration of
myotoxic xenobiotics is usually characterized by the lack of angulated fibers and the
presence of myopathic changes such as necrotic or rounded hyaline fibers, centrally
nucleated cells and divided or so called 'split fibers' (see Degeneration). The muscle
atrophy and increased protein catabolism that follows chronic administration of
corticosteroids in the rat is characterized by uncomplicated reduction in the size of type
II fast twitch fibers ([70]Livingstone et
al. 1981). This is most readily observed in type II fiber-rich muscles such as the biceps
femoris.In aging rats, atrophy of muscle fiber affects predominantly the hind limbs. There is
atrophy of muscle fibers, increased variation in muscle fiber size and accumulation of
degenerative inclusion bodies, lipofuscin and lipid droplets and increased connective
tissue ([35]Everitt et al. 1985). The
presence of angular fibers suggests that the changes may result from spinal
degeneration.
Degeneration (N)
(Figures 6, 7, 8, 9): Skeletal Muscle
Figure 6.
In A) there is muscle degeneration due to spinal nerve compromise in an aged rat.
B) shows section of spinal nerve showing degenerative alterations to nerve fibres
(H&E).
Figure 7.
Skeletal muscle from thigh of a Sprague Dawley rat treated for 3 months with a
peroxisomal proliferator (WY-14643) showing a degenerative form of myopathy. In A)
there focal inflammation associated with muscle fiber necrosis characterised by
cytoplasmic eosinophilia and loss of cytoplasmic structure. In B) typical reparative
response is seen with numerous central nuclei being visible in fibers that are
variable in thickness (H&E). Images by courtesy of the National Toxicology
Program.
Figure 8.
Quadriceps muscle from a Wistar rat treated with a novel therapeutic agent drug
that produce mild muscle degeneration associated with a chronic inflammatory
infiltrate seen in this view (H&E).
In A) there is muscle degeneration due to spinal nerve compromise in an aged rat.
B) shows section of spinal nerve showing degenerative alterations to nerve fibres
(H&E).Skeletal muscle from thigh of a Sprague Dawley rat treated for 3 months with a
peroxisomal proliferator (WY-14643) showing a degenerative form of myopathy. In A)
there focal inflammation associated with muscle fiber necrosis characterised by
cytoplasmic eosinophilia and loss of cytoplasmic structure. In B) typical reparative
response is seen with numerous central nuclei being visible in fibers that are
variable in thickness (H&E). Images by courtesy of the National Toxicology
Program.Quadriceps muscle from a Wistar rat treated with a novel therapeutic agent drug
that produce mild muscle degeneration associated with a chronic inflammatory
infiltrate seen in this view (H&E).Spontaneous focal muscle fiber necrosisin a 2 year old C57Bl mouse. An intact
muscle fiber is seen adjacent to a necrotic fiber with an early cellular response
(H&E).Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Myopathy, Myopathic changes, Cytopathic changesDiagnostic features• Vacuolation of fibers.• Basophilic cytoplasmic droplets (phospholipid).• Targetoid fibers.• Split fibers.• Hyaline changes.Differential diagnosesA variety of different pathological processes are embraced under this term. Clear
distinction often requires special staining techniques to clarify the precise nature of
the degenerative alterations. In view of the overlap between degeneration and other
cytological changes that can be seen in skeletal muscle some prefer the more general term
myopathy to embrace all such alterations including simple vacuolation (see
Vacuolation).Comment: Pathologic insults to muscle may lead to a variety of cytopathic changes in
muscle fibers. The precise nature of the changes is dependent on the nature of the damage.
Following systemic administration of agents which have a direct myotoxic effect such as
6-mercaptopurine, vincristine and emetine, muscle fibers exhibit rounding, vacuolation,
hyalinization with loss of myofibrils, pale staining central zones (targetoids) and split
fibers ([59]Jaweed et al. 1985).
Vacuolation (N): Skeletal Muscle
Species: Mouse, RatSynonyms: Myopathy, Myopathic changes, Cytopathic changesDiagnostic features• Fibers contain clear, pale or basophilic cytoplasmic vacuoles.Comment: Round cytoplasmic basophilic bodies of up to 3µm in diameter composed
ultrastructurally of laminated membranous material (spheromembranous bodies) have been
described in the muscles of rats treated with agents such as vincristine, colchicine and
chloroquine ([103]Slotwiner et al. 1966;
[20]Clarke et al. 1972; [100]Seiden 1973; [10]Bradley et al. 1976).Some agents inducing systemic phospholipidosis produce vacuolation of skeletal muscle
cells. Muscle vacuoles usually appear empty in routinely processed sections stained with
hematoxylin and eosin but in toluidine blue stained plastic embedded sections they stain
dark blue. Ultrastructural examination shows that they are composed of lamellated
membranous inclusions associated with lysosomes. Glycogen, neutral lipid may also be
present in vacuoles in skeletal muscle. Swollen or giant mitochondria may also appear as
pale vacuoles in conventional histological sections.
Mineralization (N): Skeletal Muscle
Species: Mouse, RatComment: Mineralization of dystrophic or metastatic type may be observed within skeletal
muscle. It shows histological characteristic which are similar to mineral in other tissue
(see Mineralization).
Hyperplasia (H): Mesothelium
Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Usually localized but may be diffuse.• Focal thickening or villous projections covered by relatively uniform cuboidal cells
with little or no stratification, usually limited to 1-2 cells in thickness.• Lacks evidence of significant mitotic activity.• Little or no cellular atypia.• May possess a small fibrovascular core or stalk.• Fibrosis or inflammation may accompany the changes.Differential diagnosesMesothelioma, malignant• Is highly cellular and pleomorphic and shows extensive spread within the body cavities
or infiltrates adjacent tissues.Epithelioid Mesothelioma, malignant• Exhibits poorly formed glandular structures or ill-formed glands.Sarcomatoid mesothelioma, malignant• Consists of spindle-shaped cells with elongated nuclei.Comment: These are often small incidental lesions seen in the pleura, pericardium,
peritoneum or tunica vaginalis ([77]McConnell et al. 1992).In inhalation studies fiber-associated lesions most frequently are found at the parietal
pleura.
Fibroma (B): Soft Tissue
(Figures 10 and 11)
Figure 10.
A) Subcutaneous fibroma from a mouse showing homogenous fibrous structure with
overlying epidermis. B) Higher power view of fibroma seen in A) shows paucity of
fibroblastic cells (H&E).
Figure 11.
Two examples of rat fibromas. A) poorly cellular tumour with abundant dense
eosinophilic bands of collagen (H&E, bar = 100 µm). B) also poorly cellular but
with a loose pale-staining myxoid stroma (H&E).
A) Subcutaneous fibroma from a mouse showing homogenous fibrous structure with
overlying epidermis. B) Higher power view of fibroma seen in A) shows paucity of
fibroblastic cells (H&E).Two examples of ratfibromas. A) poorly cellular tumour with abundant dense
eosinophilic bands of collagen (H&E, bar = 100 µm). B) also poorly cellular but
with a loose pale-staining myxoid stroma (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: Benign fibrous histiocytomaDiagnostic features• Dense, poorly cellular fibrous mass, compressing adjacent tissue.• Interwoven bands of mature collagen.• Interlacing bundles of well-differentiated fibroblasts.• Fusiform cells with elongated, tapered, hyperchromatic or vesicular nuclei with one or
more nucleoli.• Rare mitotic figures.• May have pale blue staining myxomatous areas and stellate cells.• May show well-differentiated fibroblasts and collagen bundles showing infiltration of
the musculature but without cytological features of malignancy.Differential diagnosesFibrosis and fibroplasia• No neoplastic features, associated with wounds, ulcers or inflammation.Fibroadenoma of mammary glands• Glandular elements within fibrous tumor tissue.Fibrosarcoma• Shows marked cellularity, cellular pleomorphism, increased mitotic activity, necrosis,
tissue invasion and metastases.Comment: Tumor cells can be arranged in a storiform or cartwheel pattern producing short
thin bundles of collagen. This pattern was formerly classified as 'benign fibrous
histiocytoma'. This term is now not usually used.Fibromas are occasionally seen in untreated rats but they are rarer in untreated aged
mice ([9]Boorman et al. 1989; [56]Heider and Eustis 1994). In rats, a fibroma
of desmoid type (also known as fibromatosis-type) has been described as postoperative
lesion in Bhd gene mutant rats ([65]Kouchi et al. 2008). This form of fibroma may occasionally be seen in
conventional strains. Fibromas have also been reported to develop in Wistar rats at the
site of repeated injection of low doses of iron dextran solution ([95]Roe and Carter 1967). Myxomatous areas
sometimes contain star-shaped fibroblasts (stellate cells).
Fibrosarcoma (M): Soft Tissue
(Figure 12)
Figure 12.
A) A well differentiated fibrosarcoma from a rat. (H&E, bar = 100 µm). In B)
the fairly cellular appearance composed of fine spindle cells exhibiting relatively
little nuclear pleomorphism can be seen (H&E).
A) A well differentiated fibrosarcoma from a rat. (H&E, bar = 100 µm). In B)
the fairly cellular appearance composed of fine spindle cells exhibiting relatively
little nuclear pleomorphism can be seen (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Solid fibrous mass.• Monomorphic interwoven fascicles of spindle cells with oval nuclei and basophilic
cytoplasm.• Cells often arranged in a 'herring-bone' pattern.• Variable collagen content depending on the degree of differentiation.• Extensive local invasion.• Areas of hemorrhage and necrosis.• May have metaplastic bone and cartilage (non-neoplastic).• May have plentiful mitotic figures.• Can predominantly consist of pale blue staining myxomatous areas with stellate
cells.Differential diagnosesFibroma and fibroplasia• No cellular atypia, low mitotic rate.Fibrosarcoma, pleomorphic• Storiform pattern of uniform plump spindle cells to a highly pleomorphic pattern of
bizarre spindle cells and tumour giant cells.Liposarcoma (myxoid type)• Fat forming cells within myxomatous tissue.Comment: There is no sharp division between monomorphic fibrosarcoma and more pleomorphic
variants. Along with the pleomorphic sarcoma these are the most common sarcoma type
induced by injection of chemicals or implantation of solid materials (see pleomorphic
fibrosarcoma below). Myxomatous areas sometimes contain star-shaped fibroblasts (stellate
cells).The presence of neoplastic bone, cartilage, muscle or other differentiated features
are diagnostic of other sarcoma types or mesenchymoma where there are two or more types of
differentiation (see Sarcoma, NOS (Not otherwise specified), Fibrosarcoma, pleomorphic,
Liposarcoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma).
Fibrosarcoma, pleomorphic (M): Soft Tissue
(Figure 13)
Figure 13.
Pleomorphic fibrosarcoma induced by implanted foreign bodies in Sprague Dawley
rats. A) and B) show the range of histological features of this type of neoplasm:
spindle cells, plump cells, multinucleated cells and bizarre cells (H&E).
Pleomorphic fibrosarcoma induced by implanted foreign bodies in Sprague Dawley
rats. A) and B) show the range of histological features of this type of neoplasm:
spindle cells, plump cells, multinucleated cells and bizarre cells (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma.Diagnostic features• Solid fibrous mass.• Variable histology ranging from storiform pattern of uniform plump spindle cells, small
rounded cells, to a highly pleomorphic pattern of bizarre spindle cells and tumor giant
cells.• Abundant but variable amount of interstitial collagen.• Ground substance variable but may show myxomatous zones.• Widespread infiltration and invasion of local tissues.• Areas with hemorrhage and necrosis.• Variable mitotic activity.Differential diagnosesFibroma and fibroplasia• No cellular atypia, low mitotic rate.Fibrosarcoma• Monomorphic spindle cells• Lacks storiform pattern and shows no cellular pleomorphism or tumor giant cells.Sarcoma, histiocytic• Contains rounded histiocyte-like cells, Langhans type giant cells and shows
immunoreactivity or CD-68 (rats) or F4/80 (mice).Rhabdomyosarcoma• Cells contain PTAH-positive cross-striations and immune-reactivity for myoglobin.Sarcoma, NOS (Not otherwise specified)• No histological characteristics that enable categorization.Comment: In both laboratory animals and humanstumors of this type have been frequently
termed malignant fibrous histiocytomas. They are considered to be a group of largely
undifferentiated or primitive sarcomas. In humans they are now often subdivided according
to their immunohistochemical and electron microscopic characteristics ([38]Fletcher 1987; [39]Fletcher 2006). Similar sarcomas have been well characterized
in rodents where they develop spontaneously. They are the most common type induced in rats
by carcinogens and non-carcinogenic chemicals, subcutaneous implants and viruses
([19]Chesterman et al. 1966;
[64]Konishi et al. 1982; [124]Wright et al. 1991; [113]Tsuchiya et al. 1993; [98]Schneider et al. 1999; [63]Kirkpatrick et al. 2000). Identical neoplasms
occur in the mouse under similar circumstances where they have been variously known as
malignant fibrohistiocytomas or pleomorphic fibrosarcomas ([11]Brand et al. 1976; [105]Stewart 1979; [36]Faccini et al. 1990). A mononuclear or polymorphonuclear infiltrate is
sometimes seen and blood vessels can be prominent. Collagen formation usually is marked in
spindle cell zones and myxoid change can develop. Large lesions may show necrosis and
ulceration of overlying skin. Metastases may occasionally occur in lung, liver and other
organs. Those that develop in the peritoneal cavity may spread along the visceral and
parietal peritoneum and mesentery surrounding abdominal organs ([102]Shoieb et al. 2012).These sarcomas are the most common type induced in rodents by powerful carcinogenic
chemicals such as polycyclic hydrocarbons as well as the repeated subcutaneous injection
of agents not considered carcinogens. Substances among the latter class include
concentrated solutions of glucose and other sugars, sodium chloride, certain water-soluble
food colourings and surfactants, carboxymethycellulose and macromolecular dextrans
([44]Grasso and Goldberg 1966a;
[45]Grasso and Goldberg 1966b;
[17]Carter 1970; [18]Carter et al. 1971;[58] Hooson et al. 1973).Some of these materials such as macromolecular iron dextrans have been used
therapeutically in humans by the parenteral route for many years without evidence of
tumour induction ([17]Carter 1970).Subcutaneous implantation of inert plastics, metals and other materials of certain
dimensions can likewise give rise to sarcomas around implantation sites in rodents, the so
called 'Oppenheimer effect' or 'solid state' carcinogenesis ([86]Oppenheimer et al. 1953;[5] Autian 1973; [11]Brand
et al. 1976; [63]Kirkpatrick et al. 2000;
[52]Hahn et al. 2002). These sarcomas
also develop around small glass and polypropylene covered microchips implanted into the
subcutaneous tissues of heterozygous transgenic p53+/− mice within periods as little as 15
weeks ([8]Blanchard et al. 1999). However,
sarcomas have been induced by implanted microchips in Fischer 344 rats and various
conventional mouse strains. Reported incidences in implanted Fischer rats is about 1% and
mice they range between about 2 and 4% in B6C3F1 mice, 1.2% in CBA/J female mice, 0.5% in
CBA/J male mice whereas CD-1mice are more resistant([110]Tillmann et al. 1997; [33]Elcock et al. 2001; [67]Le Calvez et al. 2006).
Lipoma (B): Soft Tissue
(Figures 14 and 15)
Figure 14.
Lipoma from a rat. A) Low power view of a round nodule of near normal fat cells
partially surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule. B) Higher power view showing
cellular detail (H&E).
Figure 15.
Lipoma of angiomatous type from a rat containing numerous thin walled blood
vessels (H&E).
Lipoma from a rat. A) Low power view of a round nodule of near normal fat cells
partially surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule. B) Higher power view showing
cellular detail (H&E).Lipoma of angiomatous type from a rat containing numerous thin walled blood
vessels (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatModifier: Angiomatous TypeDiagnostic features• Soft nodular, well-demarcated, lobulated fatty mass displacing surrounding tissue.• Mature fat cells each typically containing a single fat vacuole with eccentrically
located nucleus.• Cells are usually separated into lobules by fibrous septa.• Devoid of significant mitotic activity, cellular pleomorphism, necrosis or myxoid
change.• Can have brown discoloration and central necrosis if pedunculated.• Fibrous component can be very prominent.Angiomatous type• Contains many thin-walled blood vessels.• Typically found in mice.Differential diagnosesHyperplasia, adipose tissue• Is a diffuse change with little or no nodularity.Hibernoma• Typically contains multivesicular brown fat cells with centrally located nuclei.Liposarcoma• Shows histological features of malignancy such as pleomorphic spindle cells, mitotic
activity and the presence of malignant lipoblasts.Angioma• Typically devoid of intercellular fat cellsComment: Subcutaneous lipoma is a rare tumor in mice although lipomas of the brain are
more common. These may represent lipomatous hamartomas rather than true neoplasms.
Intracranial lipomas may my present in the interstitium of the choroid plexus. Lipomas
have been induced in the subcutaneous tissues of rats treated with peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists ([55]Hardisty et al. 2007).
Hibernoma (B): Soft Tissue
(Figures 16, 17, 18)
Figure 16.
Subcutaneous hibernoma from a B6C3F1 mouse (H&E). Image by courtesy of the
National Toxicology Program.
Figure 17.
Higher power view of tumor in Figure 16
showing cellular detail, notably the dense eosinophilic staining cytoplasm
(H&E). Image by courtesy of the National Toxicology Program.
Figure 18.
A) and B) low and high power view of hibernoma from the thorax from an aged Wistar
rat showing pale staining foamy cytoplasm (H&E).
Subcutaneous hibernoma from a B6C3F1 mouse (H&E). Image by courtesy of the
National Toxicology Program.Higher power view of tumor in Figure 16
showing cellular detail, notably the dense eosinophilic staining cytoplasm
(H&E). Image by courtesy of the National Toxicology Program.A) and B) low and high power view of hibernoma from the thorax from an aged Wistar
rat showing pale staining foamy cytoplasm (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: Brown fattumorDiagnostic features• Lobulated pale yellowish mass in posterior thoracic or abdominal region or within the
mediastinum.• Fairly uniform rounded cells with abundant fine cytoplasmic lipid droplets and central,
round nuclei.• Mitotic activity and cellular pleomorphism usually low.Differential diagnosesLiposarcoma• Histological features of malignancy such as pleomorphic spindle cells, mitotic activity
and the presence of malignant lipoblasts.Comment: These are very characteristic tumors showing brown fat differentiation. Tumor
cells are round oval or polygonal with dense rounded central nuclei. The foamy cytoplasm
stains with oil red O. Electron microscopic study shows numerous mitochondria and small
lipid droplets. They are rare tumors in all species including humans but they appear to be
more commonly reported in rats ([22]Coleman 1980; [1]Al Zubaidy
and Finn 1983; [104]Stefanski et al.
1987; [23]Coleman 1989; [14]Bruner et al. 2009). A recent report has
shown an increase in incidence in a colony of Sprague-Dawley rats ([14]Bruner et al. 2009). These tumors can be
stained immunocytochemically using antisera to mitochondrial uncoupling protein (UCP-1), a
protein essential for the thermogenic properties of brown fat in mammals ([14]Bruner et al. 2009).
Liposarcoma (M): Soft Tissue
(Figure 19)
Figure 19.
Liposarcoma from an aged Wistar rat. A) Shows spindle cells and fat containing
cells. B) Higher power view showing atypical fat forming cells (lipoblasts)
(H&E).
Liposarcoma from an aged Wistar rat. A) Shows spindle cells and fat containing
cells. B) Higher power view showing atypical fat forming cells (lipoblasts)
(H&E).Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Fatty mass of variable appearance.• Rounded or oval fat-forming cells with single large or multiple small cytoplasmic fat
vacuoles, spindle cells, primitive undifferentiated cells• Cellularity and mitotic activity variable• Myxoid change may be prominent in stroma.• Necrosis may be marked.Differential diagnosesLipoma• Shows no evidence of pleomorphic spindle cells, malignant lipoblasts or significant
mitotic activity.Comment: Liposarcoma is characterized by the presence of fat forming cells, termed
lipoblasts. These can be primitive mesenchymal cells with fine lipid droplets, larger
rounded or oval cells with large central or eccentric nuclei and large cytoplasmic fat
vacuoles. Various other cell types occur including 'brown' fat cells, foam cells, giant
cells, myxoid cells and spindle and stellate cells. The stroma is usually well
vascularized and a myxoid appearance may be evident and sometimes extensive ([47]Greaves and Barsoum 1990). Undifferentiated
cells also can be found and mitotic activity can be intense. Rapidly growing liposarcomas
frequently have zones of necrosis. These are uncommon spontaneous neoplasms in rats and
mice but have been induced along with fibrosarcomas in rats treated with peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists ([55]Hardisty et al. 2007; [71]Long et al. 2009).
Rhabdomyosarcoma (M): Soft Tissue
(Figures 20 and 21)
Figure 20.
Well-differentiated rhabdomysarcoma from a Wistar rat. A) Tumor cells showing good
muscle differentiation (H&E). B) Same tumor stained for myoglobin
(Immunoperoxidase).
Figure 21.
Rhabdomyosarcoma from a CD1 mouse (H&E). A) Well differentiated tumor cells.
B) Shows cross striations confirming muscle differentiation (PTAH).
Well-differentiated rhabdomysarcoma from a Wistar rat. A) Tumor cells showing good
muscle differentiation (H&E). B) Same tumor stained for myoglobin
(Immunoperoxidase).Rhabdomyosarcoma from a CD1mouse (H&E). A) Well differentiated tumor cells.
B) Shows cross striations confirming muscle differentiation (PTAH).Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Mass frequently showing necrosis and hemorrhage.• Highly pleomorphic with rhabdomyoblasts, immature spindle and strap-like cells,
mononucleated, rounded and polygonal cells.• Rhabdomyoblasts characterized by eosinophilic fibrillar cytoplasm with myofilaments,
glycogen inclusions, cross striations, immunocytochemical staining for myoglobin and
ultrastructural evidence of Z bands.• High mitotic activity with abnormal mitotic figures.• Locally infiltrative with frequent distant metastases.Differential diagnosesFibrosarcoma, pleomorphic• Shows no evidence of skeletal muscle differentiation.Leiomyosarcoma:• Generally less pleomorphic and show immune reactivity for desmin and smooth muscle
actin.Comment: The diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma depends on the histological identification of
rhabdomyoblasts. These are characterized by the presence of eosinophilic cytoplasm,
perinuclear fibrillar material, cross striations, glycogen, myofilaments well-stained with
PTAH, immunoreactivity for desmin and myoglobin. At the ultrastructural level, they show
cytoplasmic Z lines. They are uncommon spontaneously developing neoplasms in rodents. In
the National Toxicology Program less that 0.2% of Fischer 344 rats
developed this neoplasm ([83]NTP 2006).
Only 14 rhabdomyosarcomas were diagnosed at necropsy in 10,000 mice in one study, most
often originating in the quadriceps muscles with a mean age of 4 months ([106]Sundberg et al. 1991). They have been
induced in rodents by injection nickel sulphide, monocrotaline or its major metabolite,
dehydnonetronecine ([2]Allen et al. 1975;
[3]Altmannsberger et al. 1985).
Rhabdomyosarcomas have also been reported to develop around inert implants or repeated
subcutaneous injection of iron dextran or other poorly absorbed substances ([87]Oppenheimer et al. 1958; [17]Carter 1970).
Leiomyoma (B): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Well circumscribed, nodular mass.• Interlacing bundles and whorls of uniform spindle cells arranged in criss-cross
patterns of bundles.• Nuclei typically blunt-ended or cigar shaped.• Eosinophilic cytoplasm contains longitudinal myofilaments and perinuclear clear space
and show immunoreactivity for desmin.• Minimal mitotic activity and nuclear pleomorphism.Differential diagnosesLeiomyosarcoma• Shows mitotic activity and cellular pleomorphism.Fibrosarcoma• Shows mitotic activity and cellular pleomorphism but not discernible smooth muscle
differentiation.Comment: Benign tumors of smooth muscle are uncommonly found in the soft tissues of
rodents. Most have been described in the uterus. They are well-circumscribed, nodular
tumors characterized histologically by interlacing bundles of uniform spindle cells with
typically blunt ended or cigar shaped nuclei. The cell cytoplasm may contain perinuclear
clear spaces. Myofibrils are characteristically demonstrable as linear streaks which stain
blue with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin (PTAH) and red by Masson trichrome stain.
Mitotic activity and nuclear pleomorphism are minimal. These neoplasms show
immunocytochemical staining for desmin and smooth muscle actin. However, desmin may be
also present in sarcomas of other subtypes ([55]Hardisty et al. 2007).Ultrastructural features include a cytoplasm packed with thin filaments with focal
densities, some mitochondria, sparse profiles of endoplasmic reticulum and a Golgi
apparatus situated adjacent to nuclear poles, micropinocytic vesicles and dense plaques at
the points of attachment of myofilaments to the cell membrane. A poorly developed basal
lamina may be present.
Leiomyosarcoma (M): Soft Tissue
(Figure 22)
Figure 22.
A) Well differentiated leiomyosarcoma from a rat showing interwoven bundles of
spindle cells with typical oval shaped nuclei of smooth muscle. B) Another example
of a leiomyosarcoma but showing clear muscle differentiation (H&E).
A) Well differentiated leiomyosarcoma from a rat showing interwoven bundles of
spindle cells with typical oval shaped nuclei of smooth muscle. B) Another example
of a leiomyosarcoma but showing clear muscle differentiation (H&E).Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Similar to leiomyoma but more pleomorphic and with mitotic activity.• Interlacing bundles and whorls of spindle cells arranged in criss-cross patterns of
bundles.• Nuclei typically blunt-ended or cigar shaped• Bizarre polygonal cells with double or multiple nuclei may be present• Necrosis, cystic change, mineralization common features.• Distant metastases.Differential diagnosesLeiomyoma• Shows little or no cellular pleomorphism or mitotic activity.Fibrosarcoma• Devoid of smooth muscle differentiation.Rhabdomyosarcoma• Shows skeletal muscle differentiation.Comment: This neoplasm is similar to the leiomyoma but it is invasive and shows mitotic
activity and marked cellular pleomorphism. Bizarre polygonal cells with double or multiple
nuclei as well as vacuolated cytoplasm may be present. Longitudinal myofibrils are
demonstrable using the phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin (PTAH) stain. There are varying
degrees of vascularity and abundant reticulin fibers run parallel to the tumour cells.
Cellular pleomorphism, necrosis, cystic degeneration, mineralization and distant
metastases are also typical features. However, the distinction between fibrosarcoma and
leiomyosarcoma is not always clear cut. These are uncommon tumors in the soft tissues but
are reported to develop occasionally in rodents around implanted biomaterials ([63]Kirkpatrick et al. 2000).
Mesenchymoma, malignant (M): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatSynonym: Mixed sarcoma.Diagnostic features• Mesenchymal tumor showing two or more types of mesenchymal differentiation in addition
to fibrosarcomatous elements.Differential diagnoses• Sarcomas showing only one type of mesenchymal differentiation (Fibrosarcoma,
Fibrosarcoma, pleomorphic, Liposarcoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma).Comment: This term is used for those rare tumors characterized by two or more
differentiated mesenchymal tissue types such as fat, muscle, bone or cartilage in addition
to undifferentiated or fibrosarcomatous elements. Electron microscopy or
immunocytochemistry may be required to establish the presence of skeletal muscle
differentiation in such tumors.
Sarcoma, NOS (Not otherwise specified) (M): Soft Tissue
Species: Mouse, RatDiagnostic features• Mesenchymal tumor composed of sheets of undifferentiated round, spindle or pleomorphic
cells.• No recognizable light microscopic differentiation.• Electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry can sometimes lead to accurate
diagnosis.• Not all sarcomas have distinguishing features even with ultrastructural or
immunohistochemical study.Differential diagnoses• Sarcomas showing focal differentiation of a specific cell type type (Fibrosarcoma,
Fibrosarcoma, pleomorphic, Liposarcoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma).Comment: In view of the potential variety of histological appearances of neoplasms of
mesenchymal cells, it may not always be possible to make a precise diagnosis of all soft
tissue tumors, particularly without ultrastructural examination or a battery of
appropriate antisera for immunocytochemical demonstration of antigens. It is appropriate
to classify such neoplasms as sarcoma, NOS.
Mesothelioma, malignant (M): Mesothelium
(Figures 23 and 24)
Figure 23.
A) Low and B) high power view of mesothelioma of epithelioid type which developed
in the pleura of a rat in response to the administration of fine fibers
(H&E).
Figure 24.
A) Low and B) high power view of mesothelioma of sarcomatoid type which developed
in the pleura of a rat in response to the administration of fine fibers
(H&E).
A) Low and B) high power view of mesothelioma of epithelioid type which developed
in the pleura of a rat in response to the administration of fine fibers
(H&E).A) Low and B) high power view of mesothelioma of sarcomatoid type which developed
in the pleura of a rat in response to the administration of fine fibers
(H&E).Species: Mouse, RatModifier: Epithelioid type, Sarcomatoid type, Biphasic type.Diagnostic features• Predominantly superficial growth of tumor on the serosal surface where cells usually
show considerable cellular pleomorphism, mitotic activity, necrosis and infiltration of
adjacent tissues.Epithelioid type• Fronds or papillary structures.• Poorly formed glandular structures or ill-formed glands.• Rounded cells with round vesicular nuclei.• Infiltration into adjacent connective tissue.Sarcomatoid type• Relatively uniform spindle-shaped cells with elongated nuclei.• Interlacing bundles similar to fibrosarcomas or leiomyosarcomas or forming whorls
suggestive of pleomorphic sarcomas (malignant fibrous histiocytomas).• Areas resembling osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma or other sarcomas may be present
([94]Rittinghausen et al. 1992;
[15]Cardesa et al. 1994).Biphasic type• Contains both epithelioid and sarcomatoid patterns.• Any patterns noted above may be present. Each component should represent at least 10%
of the tumorDifferential diagnosesMetastatic tumors:• Presence of primary tumor with similar morphologic characteristics.The differentiation between sarcomatoid forms and other sarcoma types may be difficult
without special techniques.Fibrosarcoma• May show a similar spindle cell appearance. Without special stains it may be difficult
to distinguish spindle cell fibrosarcomas arising in soft tissues from sarcomatoidmesotheliomas particularly when they large and the site of origin unclear.Thymoma• Localized thoracic mass with highly variable epithelial patterns usually interspersed
with lymphoid tissue.Extension of primary lung malignancies into thoracic cavity• Presence of microscopic evidence of tumor extension into pleura, and similar
histological patterns in extended tumor mass.Hyperplasia, mesothelium• Lack of evidence of mitotic activity, cellular atypia, or extension into adjacent
tissues. Usually focal thickening or villous projections with cellular stratification. It
may be accompanied by inflammation.Comment: Desmoplastic areas characterized by dense collagenous tissue separated by
atypical cells may occur in all types of mesothelioma.Pleural and peritoneal cavity mesotheliomas are rare spontaneous lesions in rodents but
have been induced in rats, mice and hamsters by a number of persistent fibrous materials
or by other xenobiotics like potassium-bromate ([99]Schwartz et al. 1994; [24]Crosby et al. 2000; [60]Kane 2006; [108]Takagi et
al. 2008; [75]Maronpot et al. 2009;
[96]Sakamoto et al. 2009; [7]Bernstein et al. 2010; [30]Donaldson et al. 2010). Although a body of
evidence suggests that SV40 might be one causative agent of malignant mesothelioma in
humans this remains a contentious issue ([116]von Ruhland et al. 2004).The morphology of this tumor is similar in rats and humans ([112]Travis et al. 2004). Differentiation of pleuralmesotheliomas from primary lung carcinomas can be difficult. They not only occur in the
pleural cavity or pericardium but also the peritoneum. One of the most frequent sites in
the rat is the tunica vaginalis of the testis from which they may spread to the peritoneal
cavity ([77]McConnell et al. 1992).
Spontaneous, as well as several, xenobiotic-associated tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas are
causally associated with Leydig-cell tumors that lead to an autocrine growth
factor-induced mesothelial mitogenesis ([75]Maronpot et al. 2009).For epithelioid mesothelioma, the most useful markers are broad spectrum cytokeratin,
cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 18, Wilm's Tumor-gene 1 WT1 and calretinin ([60]Kane 2006; [75]Maronpot et al. 2009). Mesothelin is also considered to be a
reliable marker ([29]Doi et al. 2010).
Most sarcomatoid mesotheliomas typically stain positively for cytokeratin when a
broad-spectrum antibody is used. They may stain positively for vimentin, smooth muscle
actin, desmin, or S-100.Mesotheliomas uncommonly exhibit positive mucin staining, when combined diastase and
periodic acid-Schiff (D-PAS) is used. A diffuse strongly positive D-PAS in an epithelioid
pleuraltumor is strongly suggestive of pulmonary bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma, whilst
weak or focal staining is of less diagnostic value.
Authors: K T Blanchard; C Barthel; J E French; H E Holden; R Moretz; F D Pack; R W Tennant; R E Stoll Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 1999 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Jerry F Hardisty; Michael R Elwell; Heinrich Ernst; Peter Greaves; Holly Kolenda-Roberts; David E Malarkey; Peter C Mann; Pierre A Tellier Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Susan A Elmore; Robert Cardiff; Mark F Cesta; Georgios V Gkoutos; Robert Hoehndorf; Charlotte M Keenan; Colin McKerlie; Paul N Schofield; John P Sundberg; Jerrold M Ward Journal: ILAR J Date: 2018-12-01
Authors: Susan A Elmore; Michelle C Cora; Margarita M Gruebbel; Schantel A Hayes; Jessica S Hoane; Haruko Koizumi; Rachel Peters; Thomas J Rosol; Bhanu P Singh; Kathleen A Szabo Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2014-11-09 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Sara F Santagostino; Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Melissa A Nashat; Julie R White; Sebastien Monette Journal: Vet Pathol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 2.221
Authors: Timothy K Cooper; David K Meyerholz; Amanda P Beck; Martha A Delaney; Alessandra Piersigilli; Teresa L Southard; Cory F Brayton Journal: ILAR J Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 1.521
Authors: Brian R Berridge; Vasanthi Mowat; Hirofumi Nagai; Abraham Nyska; Yoshimasa Okazaki; Peter J Clements; Matthias Rinke; Paul W Snyder; Michael C Boyle; Monique Y Wells Journal: J Toxicol Pathol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 1.628
Authors: Thomas Nolte; Patricia Brander-Weber; Charles Dangler; Ulrich Deschl; Michael R Elwell; Peter Greaves; Richard Hailey; Michael W Leach; Arun R Pandiri; Arlin Rogers; Cynthia C Shackelford; Andrew Spencer; Takuji Tanaka; Jerrold M Ward Journal: J Toxicol Pathol Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 1.628
Authors: Samantha J Snow; Andres R Henriquez; Anna Fisher; Beena Vallanat; John S House; Mette C Schladweiler; Charles E Wood; Urmila P Kodavanti Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Debra A Tokarz; Margarita M Gruebbel; Gabrielle A Willson; Jerry F Hardisty; Gail Pearse; Mark F Cesta Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 1.902