Literature DB >> 25035065

Appendiceal adhesion to synthetic mesh after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a case report.

Roberto Vargas1, Anna Keryan, Vatche A Minassian.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive alternatives to abdominal sacrocolpopexy have been shown to be equivalent with low overall complication rates. A small number of direct mesh-related gastrointestinal complications have been reported in the literature. Sacrocolpopexy with mesh retroperitonealization is recommended to minimize bowel adhesions. A 53-year-old nulligravid woman presented with persistent right lower-quadrant pain 1 year after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The polypropylene mesh used during the case was retroperitonealized. Computed tomography (CT) prior to surgical exploration revealed no obvious pathology. On diagnostic laparoscopy, appendiceal adhesion to mesh requiring an appendectomy was observed. The patient's symptoms resolved after surgical intervention. Appendiceal adhesion to surgical mesh leading to chronic discomfort is a potential complication of intraperitoneal synthetic mesh placement. Our case emphasizes that bowel adhesions may occur even after proper mesh retroperitonealization. Appendiceal adhesion to the surgical site is a potential complication of retroperitonealized synthetic mesh placement at the time of sacrocolpopexy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25035065     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2466-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  5 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  William E Whitehead; Catherine S Bradley; Morton B Brown; Linda Brubaker; Robert E Gutman; R Edward Varner; Anthony G Visco; Anne M Weber; H Zyczynski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  An estimation of the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse.

Authors:  Thomas Aigmueller; Andrea Dungl; Susanne Hinterholzer; Ingrid Geiss; Paul Riss
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Reply to comment.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series.

Authors:  Sohier Elneil; Alfred S Cutner; Mary Remy; Andrew T Leather; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Brian Wise
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh.

Authors:  Fred E Govier; Kathleen C Kobashi; Paul M Kozlowski; Dimitri D Kuznetsov; Sean J Begley; Kathryn F McGonigle; Howard G Muntz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.