Literature DB >> 15913735

High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh.

Fred E Govier1, Kathleen C Kobashi, Paul M Kozlowski, Dimitri D Kuznetsov, Sean J Begley, Kathryn F McGonigle, Howard G Muntz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report on our experience using a preconfigured Y-shaped silicone-coated polyester mesh and polypropylene mesh for vaginal vault suspension. A variety of materials have been used for both open and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse. Recently, a preconfigured Y-shaped silicone-coated polyester mesh was introduced to facilitate the vaginal cuff suspension to the sacrum.
METHODS: We reviewed the data of 45 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal (n = 28) or laparoscopic (n = 17) sacrocolpopexy. Of the 45 patients, 21 underwent silicone mesh suspension of the vaginal cuff to the anterior sacrum, with a mean follow-up of 23 months (range 16 to 41). A comparative analysis was performed of 24 patients who underwent the same procedure with polypropylene mesh.
RESULTS: Of the 21 patients in the silicone group, 5 (23.8%) have had a major complication (four vaginal mesh erosions and one mesh infection) after a median follow-up of 9.5 months (range 4 to 20). The presenting symptoms were persistent or new vaginal discharge and/or nonspecific pelvic pain. One patient underwent successful removal of the mesh transvaginally, but the rest required abdominal exploration. To date, the 24 patients who underwent vaginal cuff suspension with polypropylene mesh have had no vaginal mesh extrusions or infections, with a mean follow-up of 12 months (range 1 to 38).
CONCLUSIONS: Silicone-coated polyester mesh has recently been associated with a high rate of vaginal erosion when used as a transvaginal suburethral sling. Our experience specifically with vaginal vault suspension corroborates this. We have abandoned the use of silicone mesh because of the unacceptably high extrusion rate and presently use polypropylene mesh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15913735     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Authors:  Estelle Jeanditgautier; Olivier Mayeur; Mathias Brieu; Gery Lamblin; Chrystele Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Mesh Excision: Is Total Mesh Excision Necessary?

Authors:  Gillian F Wolff; J Christian Winters; Ryan M Krlin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

6.  [Prolapse surgery. With abdominal or vaginal meshes?].

Authors:  H Loertzer; P Schneider; P Thelen; R H Ringert; A Strauß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  A rat hysteropexy model for evaluating adhesion formation and comparison of two different structured meshes.

Authors:  Ayse Filiz Gokmen-Karasu; Serdar Aydin; Fatma Cavide Sonmez; Ilknur Adanir; Gulsah Ilhan; Seda Ates
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Appendiceal adhesion to synthetic mesh after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a case report.

Authors:  Roberto Vargas; Anna Keryan; Vatche A Minassian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Prolene mesh migration into the rectum after sacral colpopexy presented with frozen pelvis.

Authors:  Suat Can Ulukent; Bulent Kaya; Orhan Bat; Nuri Alper Sahbaz; Ozlem Akca; Alpaslan Akyol
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-09-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.