Literature DB >> 15777449

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series.

Sohier Elneil1, Alfred S Cutner, Mary Remy, Andrew T Leather, Philip Toozs-Hobson, Brian Wise.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To audit the clinical outcome of abdominal vault suspension (sacrocolpopexy, hysteropexy or cervicopexy) using non-absorbable mesh, without burial by closure of the peritoneum.
DESIGN: A case series.
SETTING: Urogynaecology units of four hospitals. POPULATION: One hundred and twenty-eight women having open or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (121), hysteropexy (6) or cervicopexy (1) using non-absorbable mesh for vault prolapse.
METHODS: Patients had suspension of the vault, uterus or cervix from the sacral promontory using a monofilament polypropylene mesh. The pelvic peritoneum was not closed over the mesh. Patients were followed up every six months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of bowel complications as a consequence of the mesh; cure rate of prolapse and incidence of other post-operative complications; rate of re-operation for prolapse or incontinence. RESULT: After a median follow up of 19 months (1.5-62), there were no bowel complications as a result of non-burial of mesh. Three patients had asymptomatic vaginal mesh erosion, which required minor surgical intervention. Ninety percent of patients had good resolution of their prolapse symptoms while 10% of patients required further surgery.
CONCLUSION: Leaving the mesh uncovered by the pelvic peritoneum was not associated with complications. It appears safe to perform vault suspension without closing the peritoneum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15777449     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00426.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  17 in total

1.  Natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy (NOVaS): a cadaver feasibility study.

Authors:  Karen L Noblett; Miles Murphy; Nathan Guerette
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  [Vaginal descensus and prolapse. Which operative technique?].

Authors:  M F Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: an observational study of functional and anatomical outcomes.

Authors:  Natalia Price; Alex Slack; Simon R Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy: a novel technique for uterine preservation surgery.

Authors:  P Rahmanou; N Price; S Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Abdulmalik Bako; Ruchika Dhar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-09-09

8.  Variation in the practice of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Dutch survey.

Authors:  Mèlanie N van IJsselmuiden; Manon H Kerkhof; René P Schellart; Marlies Y Bongers; Wilbert A Spaans; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  A rat hysteropexy model for evaluating adhesion formation and comparison of two different structured meshes.

Authors:  Ayse Filiz Gokmen-Karasu; Serdar Aydin; Fatma Cavide Sonmez; Ilknur Adanir; Gulsah Ilhan; Seda Ates
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.