Literature DB >> 19936593

An estimation of the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse.

Thomas Aigmueller1, Andrea Dungl, Susanne Hinterholzer, Ingrid Geiss, Paul Riss.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We tried to estimate the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse.
METHODS: We contacted all 86 departments of gynecology in Austria and asked them about total number of hysterectomies and total number of operations for vault prolapse. We then calculated a percentage of patients undergoing surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse.
RESULTS: Sixty-five of 86 public hospitals replied (response rate 76%) and reported a total of 7,645 hysterectomies and 577 operations for vault prolapse for the year 2005, giving a percentage of 7.16 for surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. On the assumption that vault prolapse takes on the average 10 years to develop and that the number of hysterectomies decreased by 10% over 10 years, we calculated a modified frequency of 6.52%.
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to calculate an estimation of the frequency for posthysterectomy vault prolapse requiring surgical repair between 6% and 8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19936593     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1033-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  12 in total

Review 1.  The aetiology of prolapse.

Authors:  H P Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-08-02

2.  Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach; Isabelle Kaelin-Gambirasio; Sandrine Jacob; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-09-05

Review 3.  Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Christopher Maher; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery: a review at 5 years after surgery.

Authors:  I Diez-Itza; I Aizpitarte; A Becerro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-02-28

6.  True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience.

Authors:  M Marchionni; G L Bracco; V Checcucci; A Carabaneanu; E M Coccia; F Mecacci; G Scarselli
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  E C Samuelsson; F T Victor; G Tibblin; K F Svärdsudd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  [Surgery of prolapse and incontinence in Austria--current status and prospects].

Authors:  P Riss; G Ralph; P Anderl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Catherine Bradley; Debra Brandt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life.

Authors:  Th Aigmueller; P Riss; A Dungl; H Bauer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-02-02
View more
  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases.

Authors:  Yanzhou Wang; Dan Wang; Yuyan Li; Zhiqing Liang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy: a novel technique for uterine preservation surgery.

Authors:  P Rahmanou; N Price; S Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse in The Netherlands: a clinical practice survey.

Authors:  Carolien K M Vermeulen; Anne Lotte W M Coolen; Wilbert A Spaans; Jan Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Justin Houman; James M Weinberger; Karyn S Eilber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.

Authors:  Christine Hemming; Lynda Constable; Beatriz Goulao; Mary Kilonzo; Dwayne Boyers; Andrew Elders; Kevin Cooper; Anthony Smith; Robert Freeman; Suzanne Breeman; Alison McDonald; Suzanne Hagen; Isobel Montgomery; John Norrie; Cathryn Glazener
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Cæcilie Krogsgaard Tolstrup; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Vaginal intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament vault suspensions: a comparison of a standard and novel approach.

Authors:  Danny Mounir; Nyla O Vasquez-Tran; Fiona M Lindo; Danielle D Antosh; Tristi W Muir
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Appendiceal adhesion to synthetic mesh after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a case report.

Authors:  Roberto Vargas; Anna Keryan; Vatche A Minassian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: an activity-based costing analysis.

Authors:  Karen Ruben Husby; Cæcilie Krogsgaard Tolstrup; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.