Literature DB >> 30361785

Effect of concomitant mitral valve procedures for severe mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation.

Masashi Kawabori1,2,3, Chitaru Kurihara4,5,6,7, Ryan T Conyer8,9, Andre C Critsinelis8,9, Tadahisa Sugiura8,9, Todd Rosengart8,9, Jeffrey A Morgan8.   

Abstract

The effect of performing a concomitant mitral valve procedure (MVP) during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation has been reported for patients with moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR), but moderate MR is less of a clinical concern for CF-LVAD patients. There is a paucity of reports focusing on patients with severe MR. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of performing a concomitant MVP during CF-LVAD implantation in patients with severe preoperative MR. Between November 2003 and March 2016, 526 patients underwent primary implantation of a CF-LVAD at our center. Patients with severe MR who underwent a concomitant MVP were compared to those who did not in regard to overall survival, perioperative complications, postoperative echocardiography data, bridge-to-transplantation success, and CF-LVAD explantation. Of the 108 patients with severe MR, 26 underwent a concomitant MVP and 82 did not. These groups showed no difference in survival (p = 0.61). Additionally, the two groups had similar rates of postoperative right heart failure (p = 0.69) and readmissions (p = 0.42). The 24-month follow-up echocardiography results were also similar. Furthermore, the groups showed no difference in bridge-to-cardiac transplantation success (30.0% vs 25.0%, p = 0.80) or CF-LVAD explantation rates (0.0% vs 0.0%. p = 1.0). Our findings suggest that patients with severe MR who undergo a MVP during CF-LVAD implantation do not have superior outcomes to those who do not. However, assessments of other outcomes may show some benefits to performing concomitant MVPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; Left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support; Mitral regurgitation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361785     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-018-1076-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  15 in total

1.  Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.

Authors:  Ranjit John; Forum Kamdar; Kenneth Liao; Monica Colvin-Adams; Andrew Boyle; Lyle Joyce
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary.

Authors:  David Feldman; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Emma Birks; Katherine Lietz; Stephanie A Moore; Jeffrey A Morgan; Francisco Arabia; Mary E Bauman; Hoger W Buchholz; Mario Deng; Marc L Dickstein; Aly El-Banayosy; Tonya Elliot; Daniel J Goldstein; Kathleen L Grady; Kylie Jones; Katarzyna Hryniewicz; Ranjit John; Annemarie Kaan; Shimon Kusne; Matthias Loebe; M Patricia Massicotte; Nader Moazami; Paul Mohacsi; Martha Mooney; Thomas Nelson; Francis Pagani; William Perry; Evgenij V Potapov; J Eduardo Rame; Stuart D Russell; Erik N Sorensen; Benjamin Sun; Martin Strueber; Abeel A Mangi; Michael G Petty; Joseph Rogers
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Limited changes in severe functional mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension after left ventricular assist device implantation: a clue to consider concurrent mitral correction?

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Francesco Musca; Aldo Cannata; Andrea Garascia; Alessandro Verde; Valentina Pacher; Antonella Moreo; Fabrizio Oliva; Luigi Martinelli; Maria Frigerio
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Continuous flow left ventricular assist device implant significantly improves pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular contractility, and tricuspid valve competence.

Authors:  Pavan Atluri; Alexander S Fairman; John W MacArthur; Andrew B Goldstone; Jeffrey E Cohen; Jessica L Howard; Christyna M Zalewski; Yasuhiro Shudo; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Francis D Pagani; Joseph G Rogers; Leslie W Miller; Benjamin Sun; Stuart D Russell; Randall C Starling; Leway Chen; Andrew J Boyle; Suzanne Chillcott; Robert M Adamson; Margaret S Blood; Margarita T Camacho; Katherine A Idrissi; Michael Petty; Michael Sobieski; Susan Wright; Timothy J Myers; David J Farrar
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Pre-operative echocardiographic features associated with persistent mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Shuichi Kitada; Tomoko S Kato; Sunu S Thomas; Suzanne D Conwell; Cesare Russo; Marco R Di Tullio; Maryjane Farr; P Christian Schulze; Nir Uriel; Ulrich P Jorde; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Shunichi Homma; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Uncorrected pre-operative mitral valve regurgitation is not associated with adverse outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  John M Stulak; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Nicholas A Haglund; Mary E Davis; John A Schirger; Jennifer A Cowger; Palak Shah; Keith D Aaronson; Francis D Pagani; Simon Maltais
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Robert J Brewer; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Mitral valve repair at the time of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation confers meaningful decrement in pulmonary vascular resistance.

Authors:  Sharven Taghavi; Eman Hamad; Lynn Wilson; Rachael Clark; Senthil N Jayarajan; Nir Uriel; Daniel J Goldstein; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Abeel A Mangi
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Left ventricular reverse remodeling with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device measured by left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions and severity of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Morgan; Robert J Brewer; Hassan W Nemeh; Raghav Murthy; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Cristina Tita; Gaetano Paone
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Artificial Organs 2019: the year in review : Journal of Artificial Organs Editorial Committee.

Authors:  Y Sawa; G Matsumiya; S Miyagawa; E Tatsumi; T Abe; K Fukunaga; S Ichiba; T Taguchi; K Kokubo; T Masuzawa; A Myoui; M Nishimura; T Nishimura; T Nishinaka; E Okamoto; S Tokunaga; T Tomo; T Tsukiya; Y Yagi; T Yamaoka
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Persistent mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device: a clinical conundrum.

Authors:  Jose B Cruz Rodriguez; Arka Chatterjee; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jose A Tallaj; Joanna Joly; Andrew Lenneman; Sudeep Aryal; Charles W Hoopes; Deepak Acharya; Indranee Rajapreyar
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-01-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.