Sneha Raju1, Jane MacIver1, Farid Foroutan1, Carolina Alba1, Filio Billia1, Vivek Rao1. 1. From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Raju), and the Advanced Heart Failure Program, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Raju, Maclver, Foroutan, Alba, Billia, Rao).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The literature examining clinical outcomes and readmissions during extended (> 1 yr) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is scarce, particularly in the era of continuous-flow LVADs. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive LVAD patients from June 2006 to March 2015, focusing on those who received more than 1 year of total LVAD support time. Demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes and readmissions were analyzed using standard statistical methods. All readmissions were categorized as per the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support 2015 guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients who received LVADs during the study period, 37 received LVAD support for more than 1 year, with 18 receiving support for more than 2 years. Average support time was 786 ± 381 days, with total support time reaching 80 patient-years. During a median follow-up of 2 years, 27 patients died, with 1-year conditional survival of 74%. Median freedom from first readmission was 106 days (range 1-603 d), with an average length of stay of 6 days. Readmissions resulted in an average of 41 ± 76 days in hospital per patient. Reasons for readmission were major infection (24%), major bleeding (19%) and device malfunction/thrombus (13%). There were a total of 112 procedures completed during the readmissions, with 60% of procedures being done in 13% (n = 5) of patients. CONCLUSION: Continuous-flow LVADs provide excellent long-term survival. The present study describes marked differences in reasons for readmissions between the general LVAD population and those supported for more than 1 year. Prolonged LVAD support resulted in decreased susceptibility to major bleeds and increased susceptibility to infection.
BACKGROUND: The literature examining clinical outcomes and readmissions during extended (> 1 yr) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is scarce, particularly in the era of continuous-flow LVADs. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive LVAD patients from June 2006 to March 2015, focusing on those who received more than 1 year of total LVAD support time. Demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes and readmissions were analyzed using standard statistical methods. All readmissions were categorized as per the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support 2015 guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients who received LVADs during the study period, 37 received LVAD support for more than 1 year, with 18 receiving support for more than 2 years. Average support time was 786 ± 381 days, with total support time reaching 80 patient-years. During a median follow-up of 2 years, 27 patients died, with 1-year conditional survival of 74%. Median freedom from first readmission was 106 days (range 1-603 d), with an average length of stay of 6 days. Readmissions resulted in an average of 41 ± 76 days in hospital per patient. Reasons for readmission were major infection (24%), major bleeding (19%) and device malfunction/thrombus (13%). There were a total of 112 procedures completed during the readmissions, with 60% of procedures being done in 13% (n = 5) of patients. CONCLUSION: Continuous-flow LVADs provide excellent long-term survival. The present study describes marked differences in reasons for readmissions between the general LVAD population and those supported for more than 1 year. Prolonged LVAD support resulted in decreased susceptibility to major bleeds and increased susceptibility to infection.
Authors: Soon J Park; Carmelo A Milano; Antone J Tatooles; Joseph G Rogers; Robert M Adamson; D Eric Steidley; Gregory A Ewald; Kartik S Sundareswaran; David J Farrar; Mark S Slaughter Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Keith D Aaronson; Mark S Slaughter; Leslie W Miller; Edwin C McGee; William G Cotts; Michael A Acker; Mariell L Jessup; Igor D Gregoric; Pranav Loyalka; O H Frazier; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Allen S Anderson; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Wayne C Levy; David C Naftel; Richard M Bittman; Francis D Pagani; David R Hathaway; Steven W Boyce Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Randall C Starling; Yoshifumi Naka; Andrew J Boyle; Gonzalo Gonzalez-Stawinski; Ranjit John; Ulrich Jorde; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; Keith D Aaronson; Edwin C McGee; William G Cotts; David DeNofrio; Duc Thinh Pham; David J Farrar; Francis D Pagani Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Körfer; A El-Banayosy; L Arusoglu; K Minami; M M Körner; L Kizner; O Fey; U Schütt; M Morshuis; H Posival Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Leslie W Miller; Francis D Pagani; Stuart D Russell; Ranjit John; Andrew J Boyle; Keith D Aaronson; John V Conte; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna Mancini; Reynolds M Delgado; Thomas E MacGillivray; David J Farrar; O H Frazier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeremiah G Allen; Eric S Weiss; Justin M Schaffer; Nishant D Patel; Susan L Ullrich; Stuart D Russell; Ashish S Shah; John V Conte Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anthony E Peters; LaVone A Smith; Priscilla Ababio; Khadijah Breathett; Timothy L McMurry; Jamie L W Kennedy; Mohammad Abuannadi; James Bergin; Sula Mazimba Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Murat Sezgin; Murat Bülent Rabuş; Emre Selçuk; Özge Altaş; Sabit Sarıkaya; Mehmet Balkanay; Mehmet Kaan Kırali Journal: Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 0.332