Literature DB >> 9611024

Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur. Medium to long-term results.

A Kawai1, G F Muschler, J M Lane, J C Otis, J H Healey.   

Abstract

We evaluated the medium to long-term results of treatment with a custom prosthetic knee replacement after wide resection of a primary malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur in forty consecutive patients. The duration of follow-up ranged from five to seventeen years (median, eight years). At the time of the latest follow-up, thirty-five (88 per cent) of the forty patients were free of disease and five (13 per cent) were alive with metastatic disease. No local recurrence was observed. Twenty early complications occurred in eighteen patients (45 per cent). Aseptic loosening of the femoral component, which necessitated a revision in eleven patients at an average of fifty-one months, was the most frequent mode of failure. The rate of prosthetic survival, as estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method, was 85, 67, and 48 per cent at three, five, and ten years. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the rate of prosthetic survival was significantly worse for male patients, for those in whom at least 40 per cent of the femur had been resected, for those who had had total resection of the quadriceps muscles or subtotal resection (preservation of only the rectus femoris muscle), and for those in whom a straight femoral stem had been used (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Multivariate analysis showed that the independent adverse prognostic factors for prosthetic survival were male gender, resection of at least 40 per cent of the femur, and fixation of the femoral stem with cement. The rate of limb salvage was calculated, with use of the Kaplan-Meier method, to be 93 per cent at three years and 90 per cent at five and ten years. At the latest follow-up examination, the functional scores according to the classification system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society ranged from 14 to 29 points; the mean was 24 points, which represents function that is 80 per cent that of normal. The mean scores in the categories of walking supports and gait were better for the patients in whom the quadriceps muscles had been preserved than for those who had had total or subtotal resection of those muscles. Although advances in imaging and local therapy narrow the indications for an extra-articular resection of a tumor, the implant that was used in the present study continues to be used in approximately 15 per cent of patients who have a fracture or an intra-articular extension of the tumor that necessitates extensive extra-articular resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9611024     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199805000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  59 in total

1.  Distal femur and proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis in revision knee arthroplasty: a limb-saving procedure.

Authors:  Steffen Höll; Annabel Schlomberg; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Arne Streitbuerger; Dino Schulz; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Surgical technique: Methods for removing a Compress® compliant prestress implant.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Varun K Gajendran; David G Mohler; Raffi S Avedian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Distal femoral osteoarticular allografts: long-term survival, but frequent complications.

Authors:  Patrick C Toy; Jeremy R White; Mark T Scarborough; William F Enneking; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of gait parameters in distal femoral replacement using a metallic endoprosthesis versus allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Fahad AlGheshyan; Moataz Eltoukhy; Khaled Zakaria; Harry Thomas Temple; Shihab Asfour
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-23

Review 5.  Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Stefan Kinkel; Ludger Bernd; Volker Ewerbeck
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implant.

Authors:  A A Bhangu; M J Kramer; R J Grimer; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Osteogenic protein-1 delivered by hydroxyapatite-coated implants improves bone ingrowth in extracortical bone bridging.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Renwen Zhang; Robert E Turcotte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].

Authors:  R Windhager; A Leithner; M Hochegger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Telescope allograft method to reconstitute the diaphysis in limb salvage surgery.

Authors:  John H Healey; Ayesha Abdeen; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; Patrick J Boland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.