| Literature DB >> 25033462 |
André L Costa-da-Silva1, Osvaldo Marinotti2, José M C Ribeiro3, Maria C P Silva4, Adriana R Lopes5, Michele S Barros6, Anderson Sá-Nunes7, Bianca B Kojin2, Eneas Carvalho8, Lincoln Suesdek9, Mário Alberto C Silva-Neto10, Anthony A James11, Margareth L Capurro1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles aquasalis is a major malaria vector in coastal areas of South and Central America where it breeds preferentially in brackish water. This species is very susceptible to Plasmodium vivax and it has been already incriminated as responsible vector in malaria outbreaks. There has been no high-throughput investigation into the sequencing of An. aquasalis genes, transcripts and proteins despite its epidemiological relevance. Here we describe the sequencing, assembly and annotation of the An. aquasalis transcriptome. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25033462 PMCID: PMC4102416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Anopheles aquasalis sequencing results.
| Sample | No. reads | average size (nt) | total sequenced bases | % rRNA |
| sucrose-fed adult female | 131,678 | 418 | 55,152,581 | 7.4 |
| blood-fed adult female | 172,244 | 350 | 60,423,895 | 7.0 |
| larvae | 115,771 | 420 | 48,674,928 | 7.2 |
Includes all blood-fed samples.
Figure 1Number of sequences composing the assembled An. aquasalis contigs.
A total of 7544 contigs were assembled from ≥2 sequences. The number of sequences that compose each contig varies from 2 to 5,207, with an average of 35 sequences per contig. Forty-three percent of the assembled contigs contained 10 or more sequences.
Figure 2Distribution of the best matches of all An. aquasalis predicted proteins by organisms: Andar- An. darlingi; Angam- An. gambiae; Aeaeg, Ae. aegypti; Cuqui, Cu. quinquefasciatus; Drmel, D. melanogaster; Other Anopheles species; Other insects- not of the Anopheles genus; Other- non-insect organisms.
Figure 3Classification of the annotated An. aquasalis proteins in functional categories.
The numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of proteins in each category. apoptosis (64), cs- Cytoskeletal (278), detox- Detoxification (123), extmat- Extracellular matrix and adhesion (310), imm- Immunity (81), met/aa- Amino acids metabolism (87), met/carb- Carbohydrate metabolism (169), met/energy- Energy metabolism (145), met/int- Intermediary metabolism (48), met/lipd- Lipid metabolism (234), met/nuc- Nucleotide metabolism (54), mucin (82), ne- Nuclear export (19), nr- Nuclear regulation (118), pe- Protein export machinery (278), pm- Protein modification machinery (287), prot- Proteasome machinery (170), protease (94), protinh- Protease inhibitor (20), ps- Protein synthesis (283), st- Signal transduction (752), storage (11), te- Transposable element (29), tf- Transcription factor (97), tm- Transcription machinery (397), tr- Transporters and storage (536), vir- Viral product (4).
Figure 4Comparisons of developmental changes in gene expression between An. aquasalis and An. gambiae.
Developmental gene regulations [up(U) or down(D)-regulation] between larvae and sugar fed females (L-S all) or between sugar fed females and blood fed females (S-B all) of An. aquasalis transcripts that have a homolog An. gambiae (best Blast match) represented in the GeneChip Plasmodium/Anopheles Genome Array [42], [95] were compared. The pairwise comparisons including all An. aquasalis/An. gambiae homologous pairs of genes demonstrated a lack of conservation of developmental changes in transcript abundance between the two mosquito species. Similar analyses restricting the transcript list to putative 1∶1 ortholog pairs, defined by reciprocal blast and only those significantly regulated in An. aquasalis, with at least 3 fold change between two compared samples (L-S 1∶1 ort or S-B 1∶1 ort) showed that 75% the transcripts regulated by blood feeding were consistently up or down regulated in both species. Using the same restricted list of transcripts, only 49% of the transcripts were consistently up- or down-regulated between L-S in both species. Genes up-regulated or down-regulated in both species are indicated by (UU) or (DD), respectively. Transcripts differentially regulated between the two species are indicated by (UD/DU).