Literature DB >> 25030936

Role of hydraulic and chemical signals in leaves, stems and roots in the stomatal behaviour of olive trees under water stress and recovery conditions.

Jose M Torres-Ruiz1, Antonio Diaz-Espejo2, Alfonso Perez-Martin2, Virginia Hernandez-Santana3.   

Abstract

The control of plant transpiration by stomata under water stress and recovery conditions is of paramount importance for plant performance and survival. Although both chemical and hydraulic signals emitted within a plant are considered to play a major role in controlling stomatal dynamics, they have rarely been assessed together. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the dynamics of chemical and hydraulic signals at leaf, stem and root level, and (ii) their effect on the regulation of stomatal conductance (gs) during water stress and recovery. Measurements of gs, water potential, abscisic acid (ABA) content and loss of hydraulic functioning at leaf, stem and root level were conducted during a water stress and recovery period imposed on 1-year-old olive plants (Olea europaea L.). Results showed a strong hydraulic segmentation in olive plants, with higher hydraulic functioning losses in roots and leaves than in stems. The dynamics of hydraulic conductance of roots and leaves observed as water stress developed could explain both a protection of the hydraulic functionality of larger organs of the plant (i.e., branches, etc.) and a role in the down-regulation of gs. On the other hand, ABA also increased, showing a similar pattern to gs dynamics, and thus its effect on gs in response to water stress cannot be ruled out. However, neither hydraulic nor non-hydraulic factors were able to explain the delay in the full recovery of gs after soil water availability was restored.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABA; hydraulic conductivity; hydraulic segmentation; leaf hydraulic conductance; stomatal conductance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030936     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  7 in total

1.  Herb and conifer roots show similar high sensitivity to water deficit.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bourbia; Carola Pritzkow; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Balancing the risks of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation: a twig scale analysis in declining Scots pine.

Authors:  Yann Salmon; José M Torres-Ruiz; Rafael Poyatos; Jordi Martinez-Vilalta; Patrick Meir; Hervé Cochard; Maurizio Mencuccini
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 7.228

3.  Water stress in Musa spp.: A systematic review.

Authors:  Adriadna Souza Santos; Edson Perito Amorim; Claudia Fortes Ferreira; Carlos Priminho Pirovani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Beyond the extreme: recovery of carbon and water relations in woody plants following heat and drought stress.

Authors:  Nadine K Ruehr; Rüdiger Grote; Stefan Mayr; Almut Arneth
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 5.  Investigating Effects of Bordered Pit Membrane Morphology and Properties on Plant Xylem Hydraulic Functions-A Case Study from 3D Reconstruction and Microflow Modelling of Pit Membranes in Angiosperm Xylem.

Authors:  Shan Li; Jie Wang; Yafang Yin; Xin Li; Liping Deng; Xiaomei Jiang; Zhicheng Chen; Yujun Li
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-11

6.  Limited hydraulic recovery in seedlings of six tree species with contrasting leaf habits in subtropical China.

Authors:  Honglang Duan; Defu Wang; Nan Zhao; Guomin Huang; Víctor Resco de Dios; David T Tissue
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Gas exchange and hydraulics during drought in crops: who drives whom?

Authors:  Jaume Flexas; Marc Carriquí; Miquel Nadal
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 6.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.