Literature DB >> 34618104

Herb and conifer roots show similar high sensitivity to water deficit.

Ibrahim Bourbia1, Carola Pritzkow1, Timothy J Brodribb1.   

Abstract

Root systems play a major role in supplying the canopy with water, enabling photosynthesis and growth. Yet, much of the dynamic response of root hydraulics and its influence on gas exchange during soil drying and recovery remains uncertain. We examined the decline and recovery of the whole root hydraulic conductance (Kr) and canopy diffusive conductance (gc) during exposure to moderate water stress in two species with contrasting root systems: Tanacetum cinerariifolium (herbaceous Asteraceae) and Callitris rhomboidea (woody conifer). Optical dendrometers were used to record stem water potential at high temporal resolution and enabled non-invasive measurements of Kr calculated from the rapid relaxation kinetics of water potential in hydrating roots. We observed parallel declines in Kr and gc to <20% of unstressed levels during the early stages of water stress in both species. The recovery of Kr after rewatering differed between species. T. cinerariifolium recovered quickly, with 60% of Kr recovered within 2 h, while C. rhomboidea was much slower to return to its original Kr. Recovery of gc followed a similar trend to Kr in both species, with C. rhomboidea slower to recover. Our findings suggest that the pronounced sensitivity of Kr to drought is a common feature among different plant species, but recovery may vary depending on root type and water stress severity. Kr dynamics are proposed to modulate gc response during and following drought. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34618104      PMCID: PMC8331161          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  38 in total

1.  Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Xylem function and growth rate interact to determine recovery rates after exposure to extreme water deficit.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; David J M S Bowman; Scott Nichols; Sylvain Delzon; Regis Burlett
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Comparative resistance of the soil and the plant to water transport.

Authors:  W E Blizzard
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Influence of a drying cycle on post-drought xylem sap abscisic acid and stomatal responses in young temperate deciduous angiosperms.

Authors:  Nancy J Loewenstein; Stephen G Pallardy
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Differences in grapevine rootstock sensitivity and recovery from drought are linked to fine root cortical lacunae and root tip function.

Authors:  Italo F Cuneo; Felipe Barrios-Masias; Thorsten Knipfer; Jake Uretsky; Clarissa Reyes; Pierre Lenain; Craig R Brodersen; M Andrew Walker; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Drought-Induced Xylem Embolism Limits the Recovery of Leaf Gas Exchange in Scots Pine.

Authors:  Romy Rehschuh; Angelica Cecilia; Marcus Zuber; Tomáš Faragó; Tilo Baumbach; Henrik Hartmann; Steven Jansen; Stefan Mayr; Nadine Ruehr
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Suberin lamellae in the hypodermis of maize (Zea mays) roots; development and factors affecting the permeability of hypodermal layers.

Authors:  D T Clarkson; A W Robards; J E Stephens; M Stark
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 8.  Soil Rather Than Xylem Vulnerability Controls Stomatal Response to Drought.

Authors:  Andrea Carminati; Mathieu Javaux
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 18.313

9.  Impedance to Water Movement in Soil and Plant.

Authors:  W R Gardner; C F Ehlig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dynamics of leaf hydraulic conductance with water status: quantification and analysis of species differences under steady state.

Authors:  Christine Scoffoni; Athena D McKown; Michael Rawls; Lawren Sack
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coupled effects of soil drying and salinity on soil-plant hydraulics.

Authors:  Mohanned Abdalla; Mutez Ali Ahmed; Gaochao Cai; Mohsen Zarebanadkauki; Andrea Carminati
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 8.005

2.  Stomatal closure during water deficit is controlled by below-ground hydraulics.

Authors:  Mohanned Abdalla; Mutez Ali Ahmed; Gaochao Cai; Fabian Wankmüller; Nimrod Schwartz; Or Litig; Mathieu Javaux; Andrea Carminati
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Root hydraulic phenotypes impacting water uptake in drying soils.

Authors:  Gaochao Cai; Mutez A Ahmed; Mohanned Abdalla; Andrea Carminati
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 7.947

4.  Constant hydraulic supply enables optical monitoring of transpiration in a grass, a herb, and a conifer.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bourbia; Christopher Lucani; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.