| Literature DB >> 36035730 |
Honglang Duan1,2, Defu Wang2,3, Nan Zhao2, Guomin Huang2, Víctor Resco de Dios4,5,6, David T Tissue7,8.
Abstract
Subtropical tree species may experience severe drought stress due to variable rainfall under future climates. However, the capacity to restore hydraulic function post-drought might differ among co-occurring species with contrasting leaf habits (e.g., evergreen and deciduous) and have implications for future forest composition. Moreover, the links between hydraulic recovery and physiological and morphological traits related to water-carbon availability are still not well understood. Here, potted seedlings of six tree species (four evergreen and two deciduous) were grown outdoors under a rainout shelter. They grew under favorable water conditions until they were experimentally subjected to a soil water deficit leading to losses of ca. 50% of hydraulic conductivity, and then soils were re-watered to field capacity. Traits related to carbon and water relations were measured. There were differences in drought responses and recovery between species, but not as a function of evergreen or deciduous groups. Sapindus mukorossi exhibited the most rapid drought response, which was associated with a suite of physiological and morphological traits (larger plant size, the lowest hydraulic capacitance (C branch), higher minimum conductance (g min) and lower HV (Huber value)). Upon re-watering, xylem water potential exhibited fast recovery in 1-3 days among species, while photosynthesis at saturating light (A sat) and stomatal conductance (g s) recovery lagged behind water potential recovery depending on species, with g s recovery being more delayed than A sat in most species. Furthermore, none of the six species exhibited significant hydraulic recovery during the 7 days re-watering period, indicating that xylem refilling was apparently limited; in addition, NSC availability had a minimal role in facilitating hydraulic recovery during this short-term period. Collectively, if water supply is limited by insignificant hydraulic recovery post-drought, the observed carbon assimilation recovery of seedlings may not be sustained over the longer term, potentially altering seedling regeneration and shifting forest species composition in subtropical China under climate change.Entities:
Keywords: NSC; gas exchange; hydraulic conductivity; recovery; water relations; xylem embolism
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035730 PMCID: PMC9403191 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.967187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Plant traits for the tree species used in this study.
| Species | Family | Leaf habit |
| Height (cm) | Basal diameter (mm) | Dry mass (g) | Root to shoot ratio | Estimated | Achieved Ψxylem (MPa) | Achieved PLC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Lauraceae | Evergreen | 0.96 (0.06) | 50.0 (1.9) | 7.9 (0.2) | 23.7 (2.8) | 2.0 (0.4) | −2.3 (−2.9, −1.9) | −2.8 (0.1) | 59 (5) |
|
| Theaceae | Evergreen | 1.14 (0.03) | 38.6 (1.5) | 8.7 (0.3) | 25.9 (3.1) | 1.1 (0.1) | −2.3 (−2.6, −2.2) | −3.7 (0.1) | 65 (5) |
|
| Fagaceae | Evergreen | 1.06 (0.05) | 47.0 (1.4) | 6.8 (0.2) | 29.4 (4.2) | 1.2 (0.3) | −2.4 (−2.9, −1.9) | −2.6 (0.2) | 57 (10) |
|
| Fagaceae | Evergreen | 1.16 (0.07) | 42.8 (1.9) | 6.1 (0.5) | 16.4 (2.6) | 0.9 (0.1) | NA | −1.9 (0.1) | 50 (2) |
|
| Hamamelidaceae | Deciduous | 0.97 (0.08) | 76.0 (3.6) | 10.4 (0.3) | 59.4 (6.8) | 0.8 (0.1) | −2.3 (−2.7, −1.9) | −2.1 (0.2) | 66 (4) |
|
| Sapindaceae | Deciduous | 1.03 (0.14) | 107.5 (3.9) | 13.6 (0.3) | 67.7 (5.2) | 1.2 (0.1) | −0.8 (−1.2, −0.6) | −2.4 (0.2) | 70 (5) |
Values are Means with SE or 95% CI in parentheses. σ, slope of Ψl vs Ψpd, reflecting the degree of anisohydry: σ > 1, more anisohydric; σ < 1, more isohydric (see Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2014). Values of height and basal diameter (n = 21–30) and total dry mass (n = 6–9) represent values at the beginning of the experiment. Estimated P50 was derived from hydraulic vulnerability curves conducted at the beginning (n = 13–25). Achieved Ψxylem (n = 3–4) and PLC (n = 3–4) represent xylem water potential and PLC at peak drought stress, respectively. NA, data is not available.
Plant economic and hydraulic traits for pre-drought seedlings of the six tree species.
| Species | SLA (cm2 g−1) | Wood density (g cm−3) | δ13C (‰) | Ψgs80 (MPa) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 114.99b (4.43) | 0.46d (0.01) | 9.99bc (0.68) | 12.68a (0.22) | 0.21a (0.02) | 1.73d (0.14) | −33.09cd (0.53) | 0.34bc (0.02) | −1.0a (−1.3, −0.6) |
|
| 80.20d (2.49) | 0.48cd (0.01) | 11.58bc (2.25) | 7.01b (0.60) | 0.11c (0.01) | 3.28c (0.50) | −32.11c (0.21) | 0.49b (0.11) | −2.2b (−2.6, −1.4) |
|
| 80.39d (0.80) | 0.64b (0.02) | 5.9cd (1.25) | 5.97b (1.39) | 0.12c (0.03) | 1.80d (0.54) | −31.47b (0.02) | 0.54ab (0.06) | −1.5ab (−1.8, −1.1) |
|
| 79.40d (5.39) | NA | 18.10ab (3.50) | 6.76b (0.19) | 0.17b (0.01) | 3.03c (0.31) | −31.17b (0.26) | 0.49b (0.10) | −1.3ab (−1.5, −0.9) |
|
| 90.28c (3.78) | 0.50c (0.01) | 7.81cd (2.36) | 3.10c (0.76) | 0.10c (0.02) | 8.99a (0.72) | −28.99a (0.07) | 0.34bc (0.04) | −1.4ab (−1.7, −1.0) |
|
| 196.66a (16.28) | 0.74a (0.03) | 3.52d (0.73) | 6.59b (0.66) | 0.09c (0.01) | 5.03b (0.35) | −32.11c (0.04) | 0.05d (0.01) | −1.9b (−2.2, −1.4) |
Values are Means with SE or 95% CI in parentheses. Different letters denote significant differences among species for a trait (p < 0.05). SLA, specific leaf area (n = 6–8); Wood density, stem wood density without bark (n = 8); HV, Huber value, the ratio of sapwood area to leaf area (n = 3–12); Asat, leaf photosynthesis under saturating light (n = 4); gs, leaf stomatal conductance (n = 4); gmin, minimum leaf conductance (n = 6–8); leaf δ13C, leaf carbon isotopic composition (n = 3); Cbranch, normalized branch hydraulic capacity by shoot dry mass (n = 3–4); Ψgs80, the water potential corresponding to 80% stomatal closure.
Figure 1Time course of xylem water potential (Ψxylem) and predawn water potential (Ψpd) for seedlings of the six tree species throughout the experimental period. Values are Means ± SE (n = 3–5). “*” or “#” means significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) for Ψxylem or Ψpd between Control and Drought treatments at each sampling date. Control-Well-watered control; Drought-drought and recovery treatment. The vertical lines represent the time for re-watering. The first four species are evergreen species, while the last two species are deciduous species.
Figure 2Time course of leaf photosynthesis under saturating light (Asat) and stomatal conductance (gs) for seedlings of the six tree species throughout the experimental period. Values are Means ± SE (n = 3–5). “*” means significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) for Asat or gs between Control and Drought treatments at each sampling date. Control-Well-watered control; Drought-drought and recovery treatment. The vertical lines represent the time for re-watering. The first four species are evergreen species, while the last two species are deciduous species.
Figure 3Leaf stomatal conductance (gs) as function of xylem water potential (Ψxylem) for seedlings of the six tree species during drought and recovery periods. Values are raw points. Solid lines represent the Ψxylem for 80% loss of gs (Ψ), which were determined by the regressions fitted with a “sigmoidal” model. Dashed lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). The first four species are evergreen species, while the last two species are deciduous species.
Figure 4Time course of percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC) for seedlings of the six tree species during drought and recovery periods. Values are Means ± SE (n = 3–4). Red symbols represent PLC values in the Drought treatment. The blue dashed lines and shade areas refer to PLC values (with SE; n = 4–10) for each species grown in the well-watered control treatment throughout the experimental period. Day 0 represents peak drought stress and thus the time for re-watering. The first four species are evergreen species, while the last two species are deciduous species.
Figure 5Relative changes of concentration of St, Ss and NSC in stems and roots for each species at peak drought (Drought) and 7 days after re-watering (Recovery) compared with pre-drought values. “*” means significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). St, starch; Ss, soluble sugars; NSC, non-structural carbohydrates. The first four species are evergreen species, while the last two species are deciduous species.