Literature DB >> 25029375

The rational use of animal models in the evaluation of novel bone regenerative therapies.

Mihaela Peric1, Ivo Dumic-Cule2, Danka Grcevic3, Mario Matijasic4, Donatella Verbanac4, Ruth Paul5, Lovorka Grgurevic2, Vladimir Trkulja6, Cedo M Bagi7, Slobodan Vukicevic8.   

Abstract

Bone has a high potential for endogenous self-repair. However, due to population aging, human diseases with impaired bone regeneration are on the rise. Current strategies to facilitate bone healing include various biomolecules, cellular therapies, biomaterials and different combinations of these. Animal models for testing novel regenerative therapies remain the gold standard in pre-clinical phases of drug discovery and development. Despite improvements in animal experimentation, excessive poorly designed animal studies with inappropriate endpoints and inaccurate conclusions are being conducted. In this review, we discuss animal models, procedures, methods and technologies used in bone repair studies with the aim to assist investigators in planning and performing scientifically sound experiments that respect the wellbeing of animals. In the process of designing an animal study for bone repair investigators should consider: skeletal characteristics of the selected animal species; a suitable animal model that mimics the intended clinical indication; an appropriate assessment plan with validated methods, markers, timing, endpoints and scoring systems; relevant dosing and statistically pre-justified sample sizes and evaluation methods; synchronization of the study with regulatory requirements and additional evaluations specific to cell-based approaches. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Stem Cells and Bone".
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Bone fracture; Bone healing; Healing parameters; Regenerative therapy; Tools for scoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25029375     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  34 in total

1.  Alternatives to autograft evaluated in a rabbit segmental bone defect.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDaniel; Marcello Pilia; Vivek Raut; Jeffrey Ledford; Stefanie M Shiels; Joseph C Wenke; Brian Barnes; Christopher R Rathbone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Tissue engineering and regenerative orthopaedics (TERO).

Authors:  Marko Pećina; Slobodan Vukičević
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Analysis of microscopic bone properties in an osteoporotic sheep model: a combined biomechanics, FE and ToF-SIMS study.

Authors:  R Müller; A Henss; M Kampschulte; M Rohnke; A C Langheinrich; C Heiss; J Janek; A Voigt; H J Wilke; A Ignatius; J Herfurth; T El Khassawna; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Biological aspects of segmental bone defects management.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Marko Pecina; Mislav Jelic; Morana Jankolija; Irena Popek; Lovorka Grgurevic; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of synthetic ceramic products formulated with autologous blood coagulum containing rhBMP6 for induction of bone formation.

Authors:  Nikola Stokovic; Natalia Ivanjko; Viktorija Rumenovic; Anita Breski; Kuber T Sampath; Mihaela Peric; Marko Pecina; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Systemically available bone morphogenetic protein two and seven affect bone metabolism.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Jelena Brkljacic; Dunja Rogic; Tatjana Bordukalo Niksic; Ana Tikvica Luetic; Natasa Draca; Vera Kufner; Vladimir Trkulja; Lovorka Grgurevic; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A canine in vitro model for evaluation of marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell-based bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Tanmay P Gharat; Patricia Diaz-Rodriguez; Josh D Erndt-Marino; Andrea Carolina Jimenez Vergara; Dany J Munoz Pinto; Robert N Bearden; Shannon S Huggins; Melissa Grunlan; W Brian Saunders; Mariah S Hahn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antalya Ho-Shui-Ling; Johanna Bolander; Laurence E Rustom; Amy Wagoner Johnson; Frank P Luyten; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Fracture healing: a consensus report from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group.

Authors:  S L Silverman; E S Kupperman; S V Bukata
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Synthetic ceramic macroporous blocks as a scaffold in ectopic bone formation induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 6 within autologous blood coagulum in rats.

Authors:  Nikola Stokovic; Natalia Ivanjko; Marina Milesevic; Ivona Matic Jelic; Kristian Bakic; Viktorija Rumenovic; Hermann Oppermann; Larry Shimp; T Kuber Sampath; Marko Pecina; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.