Literature DB >> 25772279

Biological aspects of segmental bone defects management.

Ivo Dumic-Cule1, Marko Pecina, Mislav Jelic, Morana Jankolija, Irena Popek, Lovorka Grgurevic, Slobodan Vukicevic.   

Abstract

Segmental bone defect management is among the most demanding issues in orthopaedics and there is a great medical need for establishing an appropriate treatment option. Tissue transfer, including bone autografts or free flaps, depending on the size of the bone deficiency, is currently the "gold standard" for treatment of such defects. Osteogenic cells in combination with adequate growth factors and a suitable scaffold, from the aspect of osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity and mechanical stability, are mandatory to successfully restore a bone defect as determined in the "diamond concept". Our current knowledge on this topic is limited and mostly based on retrospective studies, case reports and a few small randomised clinical trials due to the lack of large and accurately designed randomised clinical trials using novel approaches to regenerative orthopaedics. However, preclinical research on different animal models for critical size defects is abundant, showing emerging candidate cells and cytokines for defect rebridgement. In this article we provide an overview on existing clinical studies and promising preclinical experiments that utilised osteogenic cells, growth factors and biomaterials, as well as their combination for repair of segmental bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25772279     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2728-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  74 in total

1.  Spontaneous healing of a 14 cm diaphyseal cortical defect of the tibia.

Authors:  A F Hinsche; P V Giannoudis; S J E Matthews; R M Smith
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Reindeer bone extract can heal the critical-size rat femur defect.

Authors:  Hanna Tölli; Sauli Kujala; Timo Jämsä; Pekka Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions. Influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; A Poignard; F Beaujean; H Rouard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Type I receptor binding of bone morphogenetic protein 6 is dependent on N-glycosylation of the ligand.

Authors:  Stefan Saremba; Joachim Nickel; Axel Seher; Alexander Kotzsch; Walter Sebald; Thomas D Mueller
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 5.  Free vascularised fibular grafts in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Marko Bumbasirevic; Milan Stevanovic; Vesna Bumbasirevic; Aleksandar Lesic; Henry D E Atkinson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bone: formation by autoinduction.

Authors:  M R Urist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Transplantation of culture expanded bone marrow cells and platelet rich plasma in distraction osteogenesis of the long bones.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitoh; Takahiko Kitakoji; Hiroki Tsuchiya; Mitsuyasu Katoh; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  BMP-6 and mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Slobodan Vukicevic; Lovorka Grgurevic
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 7.638

9.  Systemically available bone morphogenetic protein two and seven affect bone metabolism.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Jelena Brkljacic; Dunja Rogic; Tatjana Bordukalo Niksic; Ana Tikvica Luetic; Natasa Draca; Vera Kufner; Vladimir Trkulja; Lovorka Grgurevic; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Osteogenic potential of reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) aspirate collected from patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan M Porter; Fangjun Liu; Carmencita Pilapil; Oliver B Betz; Mark S Vrahas; Mitchel B Harris; Christopher H Evans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  30 in total

1.  Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Stefanie M Shiels; Lauren A Boller; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture repair.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Mihaela Peric; Lucija Kucko; Lovorka Grgurevic; Marko Pecina; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is ceramics an appropriate bone morphogenetic protein delivery system for clinical use?

Authors:  Slobodan Vukicevic; Nikola Stokovic; Marko Pecina
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical need for bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  Slobodan Vukičević; Lovorka Grgurević; Marko Pećina
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The Effect of Surgical Technique and Spacer Texture on Bone Regeneration: A Caprine Study Using the Masquelet Technique.

Authors:  Viviane Luangphakdy; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Nicolás S Piuzzi; Jean-Claude D'Alleyrand; Cathy S Carlson; Joan E Bechtold; Jonathan Forsberg; George F Muschler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Marshall R. Urist and the discovery of bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  Lovorka Grgurevic; Marko Pecina; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Fabrication and clinical application of easy-to-operate pre-cured CPC/rhBMP-2 micro-scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Dan Lin; Jing Zhang; Feng Bai; Xuehua Cao; Cunyi Fan; Yuan Yuan; Jinwu Wang; Jian Zhang; Changsheng Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Rapid and reliable healing of critical size bone defects with genetically modified sheep muscle.

Authors:  F Liu; E Ferreira; R M Porter; V Glatt; M Schinhan; Z Shen; M A Randolph; C A Kirker-Head; C Wehling; M S Vrahas; C H Evans; J W Wells
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.942

9.  Induced membrane technique for the treatment of severe acute tibial bone loss: preliminary experience at medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Mario Ronga; Mario Cherubino; Katia Corona; Alessandro Fagetti; Barbara Bertani; Luigi Valdatta; Redento Mora; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Osteogenic progenitors in bone marrow aspirates have clinical potential for tibial non-unions healing in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Clemence Heyberger; Charlie Bouthors; François Roubineau; Nathalie Chevallier; Helene Rouard; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.