Literature DB >> 25028457

Factors associated with adherence to an end-of-study biopsy: lessons from the prostate cancer prevention trial (SWOG-Coordinated Intergroup Study S9217).

Ellen R Gritz1, Kathryn B Arnold2, Carol M Moinpour3, Allison M Burton-Chase4, Catherine M Tangen2, Jeffrey F Probstfield5, William A See6, Michael M Lieber7, Vincent Caggiano8, Sarah Moody-Thomas9, Connie Szczepanek10, Anne Ryan11, Susie Carlin12, Shannon Hill13, Phyllis J Goodman2, Rose Mary Padberg14, Lori M Minasian11, Frank L Meyskens15, Ian M Thompson16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) was a 7-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy of finasteride for the prevention of prostate cancer with a primary outcome of histologically determined prevalence of prostate cancer at the end of 7 years.
METHODS: A systematic modeling process using logistic regression identified factors available at year 6 that are associated with end-of-study (EOS) biopsy adherence at year 7, stratified by whether participants were ever prompted for a prostate biopsy by year 6. Final models were evaluated for discrimination. At year 6, 13,590 men were available for analysis.
RESULTS: Participants were more likely to have the EOS biopsy if they were adherent to study visit schedules and procedures and/or were in good health (P < 0.01). Participants at larger sites and/or sites that received retention and adherence grants were also more likely to have the EOS biopsy (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show good adherence to study requirements 1 year before the EOS biopsy was associated with greater odds that a participant would comply with the invasive EOS requirement. IMPACT: Monitoring adherence behaviors may identify participants at risk of nonadherence to more demanding study end points. Such information could help frame adherence intervention strategies in future trials. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25028457      PMCID: PMC4119542          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  15 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Gerald L Andriole; Barnett S Kramer; Richard B Hayes; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Not all patients pursue prostate biopsy after abnormal prostate specific antigen results.

Authors:  A Krongrad; C O Kim; M A Burke; L J Granville
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Profile of men randomized to the prostate cancer prevention trial: baseline health-related quality of life, urinary and sexual functioning, and health behaviors.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; L C Lovato; I M Thompson; J E Ware; P A Ganz; D L Patrick; S A Shumaker; G W Donaldson; A Ryan; C A Coltman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Quality of life and trial adherence among participants in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Rebecca Shelby; Edward Gelmann; Colleen McGuire
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Finasteride does not increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer: a bias-adjusted modeling approach.

Authors:  Mary W Redman; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Charles A Coltman; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-05-18

9.  Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed?

Authors:  Michael J Overman; Janhavi Modak; Scott Kopetz; Ravi Murthy; James C Yao; Marshall E Hicks; James L Abbruzzese; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Implementation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

Authors:  Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; John J Crowley; Susan M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Charles A Coltman; Leslie G Ford; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Biases in Recommendations for and Acceptance of Prostate Biopsy Significantly Affect Assessment of Prostate Cancer Risk Factors: Results From Two Large Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Cathee Till; Jeannette M Schenk; M Scott Lucia; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Adherence with protocol medication use and mortality from unrelated causes in a prevention trial.

Authors:  Paul Pinsky; Phyllis Goodman; Howard Parnes; Leslie Ford; Lori Minasian
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.637

3.  Effect of Sustained Smoking Cessation Counseling and Provision of Medication vs Shorter-term Counseling and Medication Advice on Smoking Abstinence in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elyse R Park; Giselle K Perez; Susan Regan; Alona Muzikansky; Douglas E Levy; Jennifer S Temel; Nancy A Rigotti; William F Pirl; Kelly E Irwin; Ann H Partridge; Mary E Cooley; Emily R Friedman; Julia Rabin; Colin Ponzani; Kelly A Hyland; Susan Holland; Sarah Borderud; Kim Sprunck; Diana Kwon; Lisa Peterson; Jacob Miller-Sobel; Irina Gonzalez; C Will Whitlock; Laura Malloy; Suhana de León-Sanchez; Maureen O'Brien; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Baseline subject characteristics predictive of compliance with study-mandated prostate biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer: results from REDUCE.

Authors:  S Fischer; S Sun; L E Howard; D M Moreira; R Castro-Santamaria; G L Andriole; A C Vidal; S J Freedland
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.554

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.