Literature DB >> 19138953

Finasteride does not increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer: a bias-adjusted modeling approach.

Mary W Redman1, Catherine M Tangen, Phyllis J Goodman, M Scott Lucia, Charles A Coltman, Ian M Thompson.   

Abstract

Finasteride taken for 7 years in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) reduced the risk of prostate cancer by 25%, but with an apparent increased risk of high-grade disease. Subsequent analyses found that finasteride biases toward improved prostate cancer detection and accuracy in prostate cancer grading at biopsy. In our first analysis of the present study, we accounted for these biases in estimating the effect of finasteride on the risk of overall and high-grade prostate cancer. This analysis used PCPT data that included 3-month longer collection of endpoints than in the original report with observed prostate cancer rates of 22.9% (4.8% with high grade; placebo) versus 16.6% (5.8% with high grade; finasteride). Based on these updated results, the bias-adjusted prostate cancer rates are estimated to be 21.1% (4.2% high grade; placebo) and 14.7% (4.8% high grade; finasteride), a 30% risk reduction in prostate cancer [relative risk (RR), 0.70; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.64-0.76; P < 0.0001] and a nonsignificant 14% increase in high-grade cancer (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96-1.35; P = 0.12) with finasteride. We then estimated rates of high-grade prostate cancer based on an analysis that incorporated grading information from radical prostatectomies in 500 subjects diagnosed with cancer. The resulting estimates were high-grade cancer rates of 8.2% (placebo) versus 6.0% (finasteride), a 27% risk reduction (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.02) with finasteride. Our third analysis examined the impact of biopsy sensitivity on the relative risk of high-grade prostate cancer and found that differential sensitivity of biopsy between the treatment arms can have a significant impact on risk ratio estimates. These collective results suggest that the observed, unadjusted higher risk of high-grade disease with finasteride seems to have been due to facilitated diagnosis resulting primarily from increased biopsy sensitivity with finasteride. Therefore, men undergoing regular prostate cancer screening or who express an interest in cancer prevention should be informed of the opportunity to take finasteride for preventing prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138953      PMCID: PMC2844801          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  12 in total

1.  The prevention of prostate cancer--the dilemma continues.

Authors:  Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The prostate cancer prevention trial: design, biases and interpretation of study results.

Authors:  Phyllis J Goodman; Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; John J Crowley; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Logistic regression when the outcome is measured with uncertainty.

Authors:  L S Magder; J P Hughes
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Chen Chi; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Scott M Lippman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status.

Authors:  J K Gohagan; P C Prorok; R B Hayes; B S Kramer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

6.  Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen; Antonio Berenguer Sanchez; Fernando Calais da Silva; Stefano Ciatto; Louis Denis; John K Gohagan; Matti Hakama; Jonas Hugosson; Ries Kranse; Vera Nelen; Philip C Prorok; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Longitudinal analysis of sexual function reported by men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Carol M Moinpour; Amy K Darke; Gary W Donaldson; Ian M Thompson; Connie Langley; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Donald L Patrick; John E Ware; Patricia A Ganz; Sally A Shumaker; Scott M Lippman; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Leslie G Ford; Michael M Lieber; R Duane Cespedes; James N Atkins; Scott M Lippman; Susie M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Connie M Szczepanek; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Implementation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

Authors:  Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; John J Crowley; Susan M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Charles A Coltman; Leslie G Ford; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04

10.  Finasteride and high-grade prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  M Scott Lucia; Jonathan I Epstein; Phyllis J Goodman; Amy K Darke; Victor E Reuter; Francisco Civantos; Catherine M Tangen; Howard L Parnes; Scott M Lippman; Francisco G La Rosa; Michael W Kattan; E David Crawford; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  63 in total

1.  Comparison of maximal and more maximal intermittent androgen blockade during 5-year treatment of advanced prostate cancer T3NxMx-1.

Authors:  Slawomir A Dutkiewicz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Prostate cancer: A closer look at the initial results from the REDUCE trial.

Authors:  Peter H Gann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Does variation in either age at start of therapy or duration of therapy make chemoprevention with finasteride cost-effective?

Authors:  S B Stewart; C D Scales; J W Moul; S D Reed
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  Risk factors for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-02

Review 5.  Molecular targets for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  William N William; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Prevention of prostate cancer: outcomes of clinical trials and future opportunities.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; Alan Kristal; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

7.  Case-only Methods Identified Genetic Loci Predicting a Subgroup of Men with Reduced Risk of High-grade Prostate Cancer by Finasteride.

Authors:  James Y Dai; Michael LeBlanc; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2018-12-11

Review 8.  Future directions in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; April B Cabang; Michael J Wargovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Long-term Consequences of Finasteride vs Placebo in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Cathee Till; Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Jason D Wright; William E Barlow; Scott D Ramsey; Lori M Minasian; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.