Literature DB >> 2502694

Cost effectiveness of testing for chlamydial infections in asymptomatic women.

H Buhaug1, F E Skjeldestad, B Backe, A Dalen.   

Abstract

Routine testing for Chlamydia trachomatis during gynecological visits, as well as treatment of those found positive, has been suggested as a preventive measure against the serious consequences of chlamydial genital infections, e.g., pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, and ectopic pregnancy. This article examines the cost and effectiveness of this practice. The study is based on a model that predicts how routine testing and treatment will affect the future number of cases of PID, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy. The costs of test and treatment are estimated, as are the savings resulting from prevention. Results indicate that although routine testing was not effective in reducing the overall morbidity caused by chlamydial infections, for women 18-22 years of age routine testing during regular gynecologic sessions can be a cost-effective personal health service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2502694     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198908000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

Review 1.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.

Authors:  T E Roberts; S Robinson; P Barton; S Bryan; N Low
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Should asymptomatic patients be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice?

Authors:  H Buhaug; F E Skjeldestad; L E Halvorsen; A Dalen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Use of laboratory testing for genital chlamydial infection in Norway.

Authors:  P Aavitsland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

4.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Screening guidelines for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Evaluating physician awareness, agreement, and use.

Authors:  K Weyman; A R Lanning
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  How robust are the natural history parameters used in chlamydia transmission dynamic models? A systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Davies; Sarah-Jane Anderson; Katy M E Turner; Helen Ward
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.432

7.  Estimating age-dependent per-encounter chlamydia trachomatis acquisition risk via a Markov-based state-transition model.

Authors:  Yu Teng; Nan Kong; Wanzhu Tu
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2014-04-25

8.  Disease dynamics and costly punishment can foster socially imposed monogamy.

Authors:  Chris T Bauch; Richard McElreath
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.