Literature DB >> 10131639

Use of laboratory testing for genital chlamydial infection in Norway.

P Aavitsland1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of laboratory tests for genital chlamydial infection in Norway.
DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of general practitioners' practice in chlamydial testing, retrospective survey of laboratory records, 1986-91, and prospective study of testing in one laboratory during four weeks.
SETTING: All 18 microbiological laboratories in Norway (4.2 million population), including one serving all doctors in Vestfold county (0.2 million population).
SUBJECTS: 302 general practitioners. MAIN MEASURES: GPs' routine practice, methods used for testing, 1986-91, and sex specific and age group specific testing in 1991.
RESULTS: 201(69%) GPs replied to the questionnaire: 101(51%) would test all women younger than 25 years at routine pelvic examination, 107(54%) all girls at first pelvic examination, 131(66%) all pregnant women, and 106(54%) all men whose female partner had urogenital complaints. Nationwide in 1986, 122,000 tests were performed (2.9 per 100 population); 10% were positive and 51% were cell culture tests. In 1991, 341,000 tests were performed (8.0 per 100 population); 4.5% were positive and 15% were cell culture tests. 13,184 tests were performed in Vestfold in 1991 (6.6 per 100 population). The age group specific rates (per 100 population) among women were: age 15-19 years, 22.0(95% confidence interval 18.2 to 25.8); 20-24 years, 47.2(42.1 to 52.3); 25-29 years, 42.3(37.1 to 47.5); 30-34 years, 29.8(25.4 to 34.2); and 35-39 years, 12.5(9.5 to 15.5).
CONCLUSIONS: GPs use liberal indications for testing. The dramatic increase in testing, especially by enzyme immunoassays, in populations with a low prevalence of infection results in low cost effectiveness and low predictive value of positive tests, which in women over 29 years is estimated as 17-36%. IMPLICATIONS: Doctors should be educated about the limitations of enzyme immunoassays in screening low prevalence populations, and laboratories should apply a confirmatory test to specimens testing positive with such assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10131639      PMCID: PMC1055091          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  17 in total

1.  Survey of the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the female genital tract.

Authors:  P Aavitsland
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Screening, ethics, and the law.

Authors:  P J Edwards; D M Hall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-01

3.  [Contact tracing routines for genital chlamydia infections used by Norwegian physicians. A questionnaire study].

Authors:  R Mowinckel; J A Staurset; P Holen; P Aavitsland
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1992-05-20

Review 4.  Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: an epidemiologic update.

Authors:  W Cates; R T Rolfs; S O Aral
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 5.  Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae.

Authors:  W Cates; J N Wasserheit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

7.  Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  H H Handsfield; L L Jasman; P L Roberts; V W Hanson; R L Kothenbeutel; W E Stamm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Chlamydiazyme plus blocking assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  R D Mills; A Young; K Cain; T M Blair; M A Sitorius; G L Woods
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  [Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis--culture or enzyme immunoassay? Norwegian multicenter study].

Authors:  S A Nordbø; A Mehl; I S Vik; E Ragnhildstveit
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1991-08-20

10.  Should tests for Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection be done during routine gynecologic visits? An analysis of the costs of alternative strategies.

Authors:  R S Phillips; M D Aronson; W C Taylor; C Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hilde Kløvstad; Olav Natås; Aage Tverdal; Preben Aavitsland
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.090

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.