Literature DB >> 7734996

Screening guidelines for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Evaluating physician awareness, agreement, and use.

K Weyman1, A R Lanning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians were aware of, agreed with, and followed the "1989 Canadian Guidelines for Screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection "as they applied to screening asymptomatic women.
DESIGN: A survey consisting of direct questions and case scenarios was scored according to the responses given in the guidelines.
SETTING: Six hospital family practice teaching units in downtown Toronto. PARTICIPANTS: Of 153 staff physicians and residents surveyed (all staff and residents registered with the Department of Family and Community Medicine of the University of Toronto for the 1990-1991 academic year), a volunteer sample of 118 responded to a questionnaire through the mail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported awareness, agreement, and use of C trachomatis guidelines for screening asymptomatic women were analyzed using frequency distributions and cross-tabulations.
RESULTS: Most (69%) respondents were unaware of the guidelines. Of those who were aware, 46% agreed with the guidelines and 39% claimed to follow the guidelines. Staff physicians appeared to be more aware of guidelines than family medicine residents (P = 0.0175, psi 2 = 11.98); P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. There was no statistically significant association between total scores and physicians' reported awareness of guidelines (P = 0.2287, psi 2 = 4.321).
CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians in the sample were unaware of the guidelines. Of physicians who reported awareness of the guidelines, less than half agreed with or routinely followed them. Better methods of influencing physician behaviour must be developed before more guidelines are designed and distributed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7734996      PMCID: PMC2146240     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  21 in total

Review 1.  Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations.

Authors:  J Lomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  The "Help Your Patient Stop" initiative. Evaluation of smoking prevalence and dissemination of WHO/UICC guidelines in UK general practice.

Authors:  G Fowler; D Mant; A Fuller; L Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-06-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Cost effectiveness of testing for chlamydial infections in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  H Buhaug; F E Skjeldestad; B Backe; A Dalen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  J W Sellors; J B Mahony; D Jang; L Pickard; C H Goldsmith; A Gafni; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Costs of pelvic inflammatory disease and associated sequelae in Canada.

Authors:  M J Todd; A Estany; R McLaren
Journal:  Can Dis Wkly Rep       Date:  1988-11-12

7.  High prevalence of silent chlamydia colonization of the tubal mucosa in infertile women.

Authors:  R Marana; A Lucisano; F Leone; A Sanna; S Del'Acqua; S Mancuso
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and risk for tubal pregnancy.

Authors:  M D Walters; C A Eddy; R S Gibbs; J Schachter; A E Holden; C J Pauerstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Should tests for Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection be done during routine gynecologic visits? An analysis of the costs of alternative strategies.

Authors:  R S Phillips; M D Aronson; W C Taylor; C Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.

Authors:  J Kosecoff; D E Kanouse; W H Rogers; L McCloskey; C M Winslow; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Emergency Department Management of Bronchiolitis in the United States.

Authors:  Constance Gong; Terri Byczkowski; Constance McAneney; Monika K Goyal; Todd A Florin
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.454

2.  Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection.

Authors:  D B Langille; C T Naugler; M R Joffres
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  How well do family physicians manage sexually transmitted diseases?

Authors:  P R Gully; D C Fisher; R Pless; C Herbert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Reasons for testing women for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Calgary region.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Ali Zentner; Heather Semeniuk; Elizabeth Henderson; Ron Read
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01

Review 5.  Patterns of 'leakage' in the utilisation of clinical guidelines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sharon Mickan; Amanda Burls; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.