| Literature DB >> 28316475 |
Sung-Il Ahn1, Jun-Hong Park1, Jae-Hoon Kim2, Duk-Geun Oh2, Moojoong Kim3, Donghwa Chung4, Jin-Woo Jhoo1, Gur-Yoo Kim1.
Abstract
This study aimed at optimizing the manufacturing conditions of a milk beverage supplemented with coffee, and monitoring its physicochemical and sensory properties during storage. Raw milk, skim milk powder, coffee extract, and emulsifiers were used to manufacture the beverage. Two sucrose fatty acid esters, F110 and F160, were identified as suitable emulsifiers. The optimum conditions for the beverage manufacture, which can satisfy two conditions at the same time, determined by response surface methodology (RSM), were 5,000 rpm primary homogenization speed and 0.207% sucrose fatty acid emulsifier addition. The particle size and zeta-potential of the beverage under the optimum condition were 190.1 nm and - 25.94±0.06 mV, respectively. In comparison study between F110 added group (GF110) and F160 added group (GF160) during storage, all samples maintained its pH around 6.6 to 6.7, and there was no significant difference (p<0.05). In addition, GF110 showed significantly higher zeta-potential than GF160 (p<0.05). The particle size of GF110 and GF160 were approximately 190.1 and 223.1 nm, respectively at initial. However, size distribution of the GF160 tended to increase during storage. Moreover, increase of the particle size in GF160 was observed in microphotographs of it during storage. The L* values gradually decreased within all groups, whereas the a* and b* values did not show significant variations (p<0.05). Compared with GF160, bitterness, floating cream, and rancid flavor were more pronounced in the GF110. Based on the result obtained from the present study, it appears that the sucrose fatty acid ester F110 is more suitable emulsifier when it comes to manufacturing this beverage than the F160, and also contributes to extending product shelf-life.Entities:
Keywords: RSM; coffee; emulsification; shelf-life
Year: 2017 PMID: 28316475 PMCID: PMC5355588 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.1.87
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Ingredients of the milk beverage supplemented with coffee
| Ingredient | (%) |
|---|---|
| Raw milk | 30.000 |
| Coffee extract | 30.000 |
| Sucrose | 5.500 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.040 |
| Etc. | 34.46 |
| Total | 100.000 |
Coded level for independent variables used in the experimental design for milk beverages supplemented coffee
| Variables | Coded | Coded level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | ||
| Speed of primary homogenization (rpm) | 5,000 | 10,000 | 15,000 | |
| Concentration of emulsifier (%) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |
Fig. 1.Measurement of particle size to determine the optimum type of emulsifier for manufacturing of milk beverages supplemented with coffee.
Fig. 2.Measurement of zeta-potential to determine the optimum type of emulsifier for manufacturing of milk beverages supplemented with coffee.
Central composite design and response variables for milk beverage supplemented with coffee
| Run number | Coded variable1) | Process variable | Response variables2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | 0 | 5,000 | 0.2 | 217.867 | 36.1000 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 0.2 | 260.500 | 35.6000 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 0.2 | 186.433 | 30.8300 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | 15,000 | 0.3 | 219.767 | 32.5666 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 0.2 | 181.933 | 29.0667 |
| 6 | −1 | +1 | 5,000 | 0.3 | 178.267 | 29.9667 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | 5,000 | 0.1 | 179.900 | 27.5000 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 0.2 | 175.633 | 29.6000 |
| 9 | +1 | −1 | 15,000 | 0.1 | 179.533 | 24.3000 |
| 10 | +1 | 0 | 15,000 | 0.2 | 178.367 | 28.2667 |
| 11 | 0 | +1 | 10,000 | 0.3 | 182.167 | 28.2000 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 0.2 | 180.333 | 29.1000 |
| 13 | 0 | −1 | 10,000 | 0.1 | 185.333 | 29.1000 |
1)X1 and X2 are speed of primary homogenization and the concentration of emulsifier (%), respectively.
2)Y1 and Y2 are the particle sizes and zeta-potentials of milk beverages, respectively.
Values of the regression coefficients calculated for milk beverage supplemented with coffee
| Response variables1) | Independent variable | Regression coefficient | Standard error coefficient | Significance ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 201.539 | 17.29 | 1.1658 | 0.000 | |
| Linear | |||||
| −12.267 | 17.00 | −0.722 | 0.494 | ||
| 5.906 | 17.00 | 0.347 | 0.738 | ||
| Quadratic | |||||
| 22.763 | 25.05 | 0.909 | 0.394 | ||
| −29.220 | 25.05 | −1.166 | 0.282 | ||
| Interaction | |||||
| 10.467 | 20.82 | 0.503 | 0.631 | ||
| Constant | 31..0339 | 1.253 | 24.767 | 0.000 | |
| Linear | |||||
| −1.4056 | 1.232 | −1.141 | 0.291 | ||
| 1.6389 | 1.232 | 1.330 | 0.225 | ||
| Quadratic | |||||
| 0.6630 | 1.816 | 0.365 | 0.726 | ||
| −2.8704 | 1.816 | −1.581 | 0.158 | ||
| Interaction | |||||
| 1.4500 | 1.509 | 0.961 | 0.369 | ||
1)Y1 and Y2 are the particle sizes and zeta-potentials of milk beverages, respectively.
Fig. 3.The 3-D surface and contour plots for milk beverages supplemented with coffee.
Fig. 4.Optimization curve process for milk beverages supplemented with coffee.
Fig. 5.Particle size distribution of milk beverage supplemented with coffee under the optimum condition by RSM.
Fig. 6.Changes in pH of milk beverages supplemented with coffee in the presence of different emulsifiers during storage at 4°C for 12 d.
Fig. 7.Changes in peroxide values of milk beverages supplemented with coffee in the presence of different emulsifiers during storage at 4°C for 12 d.
Fig. 8.Changes in zeta-potentials of milk beverages supplemented with coffee in the presence of different emulsifiers during storage at 4°C for 12 d.
Fig. 9.Changes in size distributions of milk beverages supplemented with coffee in the presence of different emulsifiers during storage at 4°C for 12 d.
Fig. 10.Morphological changes of particles in milk beverages supplemented with coffee during storage.
Changes in color of milk beverages supplemented with coffee, using different emulsifiers, stored at 4°C for 12 d1)
| Color value | Sample | Storage period (d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | ||
| L* | GF1602) | 52.07bB | 48.71bcB | 55.97aA | 44.53dB | 45.35cdA |
| GF1103) | 60.36aA | 61.78aA | 56.37bA | 54.75bA | 49.61cA | |
| a* | GF160 | 6.28aA | 6.53aB | 4.93cA | 5.47bB | 5.34bB |
| GF110 | 5.45cB | 7.10aA | 4.69dA | 6.38bA | 6.59bA | |
| b* | GF160 | 21.26abA | 21.12abA | 22.50aA | 22.10abA | 20.90bA |
| GF110 | 20.02cB | 21.35bA | 21.45bB | 23.78aA | 21.14bA | |
1)Values with different superscript in a row (a-b) and column (A-B) are significant at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test;
2)GF160, sucrose fatty acid ester F160 added group; 3)GF110, sucrose fatty acid ester F110 added group.
Sensory evaluation of milk beverages supplemented with coffee, using different emulsifiers, stored at 4°C for 12 d1)
| Sensory description | Sample | Storage period (d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | ||
| Brownness | GF1602) | 3.20±0.45aA | 3.30±0.48aA | 3.40±0.52aA | 3.10±0.57aA | 3.10±0.32aA |
| GF1103) | 3.20±0.89bA | 3.40±0.52aA | 3.30±0.48aA | 3.20±0.63aA | 3.20±0.42aA | |
| Floating cream | GF160 | 1.00±0.00bA | 1.00±0.00bA | 1.20±0.67bA | 1.30±0.63abA | 1.40±0.48aA |
| GF110 | 1.00±0.00aA | 1.00±0.00aA | 1.10±0.95aA | 1.10±0.63aA | 1.10±0.42aB | |
| Coffee flavor | GF160 | 3.40±1.14aA | 3.40±0.70aA | 3.60±0.97aA | 3.30±0.67aA | 2.90±0.57aA |
| GF110 | 3.80±1.10aA | 3.50±1.16aA | 3.30±1.20aA | 3.40±0.97aA | 3.10±0.74aA | |
| Milk flavor | GF160 | 3.30±1.79aA | 2.70±1.16aA | 2.50±0.85aA | 2.60±0.70aA | 2.40±0.97aA |
| GF110 | 3.20±0.84aA | 2.80±0.74aA | 2.40±0.67aA | 2.50±0.79aB | 2.40±1.07aA | |
| Rancid flavor | GF160 | 1.00±0.00aA | 1.00±0.00aA | 1.20±0.63aA | 1.30±0.67aA | 1.20±0.42aA |
| GF110 | 1.00±0.00aA | 1.00±0.00aA | 1.10±0.95aA | 1.10±0.70aA | 1.10±0.32aA | |
| Sweetness | GF160 | 3.60±1.34aA | 3.90±0.88aA | 3.10±0.99aA | 3.20±0.63aA | 3.50±0.85aA |
| GF110 | 2.80±0.45aB | 2.80±0.32aB | 3.20±1.23aA | 2.90±1.20aA | 3.60±0.52aA | |
| Bitterness | GF160 | 2.00±1.00aB | 1.80±0.79aA | 2.40±1.58aA | 1.80±1.03aA | 1.60±1.07aA |
| GF110 | 2.60±1.14aA | 2.10±1.29aA | 2.60±1.51aA | 2.30±1.34aA | 1.60±0.84aA | |
| Overall acceptability | GF160 | 4.20±0.84aA | 4.00±0.82aA | 3.30±1.16aA | 3.50±1.18aA | 3.40±1.07aA |
| GF110 | 2.80±0.45aB | 2.80±1.32aB | 3.00±1.15aA | 2.70±0.95aA | 3.00±0.82aA | |
1)Values with different superscript in a row (a-b) and column (A-B) are significant at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test;
2)GF160, sucrose fatty acid ester F160 added group; 3)GF110, sucrose fatty acid ester F110 added group.