Literature DB >> 25013470

Comparison of K-ras mutations in lung, colorectal and gastric cancer.

Nanqiu Peng1, Xintai Zhao1.   

Abstract

K-ras is involved in the EGFR pathway that regulates cell survival, motility and proliferation, as well as angiogenesis and metastasis. It is also essential for carcinogenesis. The K-ras mutation status can be used to predict the therapeutic efficacy of targeted drugs such as cetuximab. The aim of this study was to compare K-ras mutation in different types of cancer. Nested and COLD-PCR were used to detect K-ras mutations. The Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. In this study, the total K-ras mutation frequency was found to be 9.09, 18.61 and 6.67% in lung, colorectal and gastric cancer, respectively. Similar K-ras mutation frequencies were detected among sample types and genders for lung and gastric cancer, with the exception of colorectal cancer. However, age had no impact on the K-ras mutation rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COLD-PCR; K-ras mutation; colorectal cancer; gastric cancer; lung cancer

Year:  2014        PMID: 25013470      PMCID: PMC4081128          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Cancer is a global disease with a high incidence of mortality, having caused 7.6 million mortalites in 2008 alone. Over the past 10 years, there has been a decreasing trend in mortality due to cancer, allowing for the prevention of ~1.18 million cancer-related mortalities (1,2). Lung, colorectal and gastric cancer are the leading cancer types in terms of occurrence and severity: lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and the first leading cause of cancer mortality, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality, while gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality (1). The incidence of cancer has seen a steady decline in males while it has remained stable in females, resulting in a gradual decrease in the overall mortality rate with regard to cancer (2). Thus NCCN guidelines suggest that the K-ras mutation be detected prior to applying medication such as cetuximab.

Materials and methods

Patients

Clinical samples were obtained from 100 hospitals in China, including 131 tissue samples, 51 plasma samples, and 5 pleural and ascites samples for lung cancer; 445 tissue and 60 plasma samples for colorectal cancer; and 126 tissue and 9 plasma samples for gastric cancer. Approval for this study was obtained from the Shanghai Clinical Research Center Ethics Committee. All patients participating in this study provided written informed consent. Tissue samples were stored and transported under controlled temperatures, while plasma, and pleural and ascites samples were transported on ice packs. The following materials were purchased: Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), dNTP (Shi Ze Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), the DNA extraction kit (DN10, Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), PCR instrument (EDC-810, Eastwin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), BioSafe Centrifuge Systems (L420, Xiangyi LXJ Centrifuge Instruments Co., Ltd.).

Methods

Nested and COLD-PCR were used to detect the K-ras mutations. Regular PCR was used to amplify the 465-bp outer product. The primers used were: forward, 5′-GTCGATGGAGG AGTTTGTAAATGAAGT-3′ and reverse 5′-TTCAGATAACTTAACTTTCAGCATAATTATCTTG-3′. This was followed by 10 μl PCR reaction mixture including 0.25 mM dNTP, 0.5 μM primers, 0.5 units Taq DNA polymerase and 10 ng DNA template. The PCR program was conducted under the following conditions: 3 min at 95°C for 1 cycle, 32 amplification cycles for 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec in 57°C, and 30 sec at 72°C, and maintained for 5 min at 72°C. COLD-PCR was used to amplify the 155-bp inner product. The primers used were: forward, 5′-GTCACATTTT CATTATTTTTATTATAAGG-3′ and reverse 5′-TTTACCTCTATTGTTGGATCATATTC-3′. This was followed by 50 μl PCR reaction mixture including 0.25 mM dNTP, 0.5 μM primers, 0.5 units Taq DNA polymerase and 1 μl outer PCR product. The PCR program was conducted under the following conditions: 3 min at 95°C for 1 cycle, 40 amplification cycles for 30 sec at 80°C, 30 sec in 58°C, 30 sec at 72°C, followed by 15 cycles for 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 58°C, and 30 sec at 72°C, maintained for 5 min at 72°C. The Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The K-ras mutation frequency was detected in lung cancer (Table I), colorectal cancer (Table II) and gastric cancer (Table III). COLD-PCR was used to detect the K-ras mutations. Fig. 1 shows the representative results, which showed the G12D (GGT>GAT) mutation.
Table I

The mutation frequencies of K-ras gene in different sample types, genders and age groups of lung cancer patients detected with COLD-PCR and sequencing.

Mutation frequency (%)

Type of samplesGenderAge (years)



Amino acid changeK-ras mutationPlasmaN=51Tumor tissueN=131Pleural and ascitesN=5MaleN=123FemaleN=64Youth (25–44)N=9Middle age (45–59)N=72Elderly (60–90)N=106
G12SGGT>AGT
G12RGGT>CGT
G12CGGT>TGT2 (1.53)2 (1.63)1 (1.39)1 (0.94)
G12DGGT>GAT5 (3.82)1 (20)4 (3.25)2 (3.13)1 (1.39)5 (4.72)
G12AGGT>GCT
G12VGGT>GTT4 (3.05)2 (1.63)2 (3.13)1 (1.39)3 (2.83)
G13SGGC>AGC
G13RGGC>CGC
G13CGGC>TGC
G13DGGC>GAC1 (1.96)4 (3.05)3 (2.44)2 (3.13)1 (11.11)2 (2.78)2 (1.89)
G13AGGC>GCC
G13VGGC>GTC
Q61KCAA>AAA
Q61LCAA>CTA
Q61HCAA>CAT
Total (%)1.9611.45208.949.3811.116.9410.38
Table II

The mutation frequencies of K-ras gene in different sample types, genders, and age groups of colorectal cancer patients detected with COLD-PCR and sequencing.

Mutation frequency

Type of samplesGenderAge (years)



Amino acid changeK-ras mutationPlasmaN=60Tumor tissueN=445Pleural and ascitesN=0MaleN=294FemaleN=211Youth (25–44)N=60Middle age (45–59)N=195Elderly (60–90)N=250
G12SGGT>AGT2 (0.45)2 (0.95)1 (0.51)1 (0.4)
G12RGGT>CGT1 (0.22)1 (0.34)1 (0.4)
G12CGGT>TGT5 (1.12)3 (1.02)2 (0.95)1 (0.51)4 (1.6)
G12DGGT>GAT1 (1.67)35 (7.87)14 (4.76)22 (10.43)3 (5)12 (6.15)21 (8.4)
G12AGGT>GCT4 (0.90)3 (1.02)1 (0.47)2 (1.03)2 (0.8)
G12VGGT>GTT1 (1.67)14 (3.15)9 (3.06)6 (2.84)8 (4.10)7 (2.8)
G13SGGC>AGC2 (0.45)2 (0.95)2 (0.8)
G13RGGC>CGC1 (0.22)1 (0.34)1 (0.51)
G13CGGC>TGC1 (0.22)1 (0.34)1 (0.4)
G13DGGC>GAC1 (1.67)24 (5.39)11 (3.74)14 (6.64)2 (3.33)15 (7.69)8 (3.2)
G13AGGC>GCC
G13VGGC>GTC
Q61KCAA>AAA
Q61LCAA>CTA2 (0.45)1 (0.34)1 (0.47)1 (0.51)1 (0.4)
Q61HCAA>CAT
Total (%)520.4514.9723.708.3321.0319.2
Table III

The mutation frequencies of K-ras gene in different sample types, genders, and age groups of gastric cancer patients detected with COLD-PCR and sequencing.

Mutation frequency

Type of samplesGenderAge (years)



Amino acid changeK-ras mutationPlasmaN=9Tumor tissueN=126Pleural and ascitesN=0MaleN=92FemaleN=43Youth (25–44)N=22Middle age (45–59)N=61Elderly (60–90)N=52
G12SGGT>AGT
G12RGGT>CGT
G12CGGT>TGT
G12DGGT>GAT3 (2.38)3 (3.26)1 (4.55)1 (1.64)1 (1.92)
G12AGGT>GCT
G12VGGT>GTT
G13SGGC>AGC
G13RGGC>CGC
G13CGGC>TGC
G13DGGC>GAC6 (4.76)4 (4.35)2(4.65)1 (4.55)2 (3.28)3 (5.77)
G13AGGC>GCC
G13VGGC>GTC
Q61KCAA>AAA
Q61LCAA>CTA
Q61HCAA>CAT
Total (%)07.147.614.659.094.927.69
Figure 1

Representative sequencing chromatogram of COLD-PCR product, showing the GGT mutation to GAT at codon 12 of K-ras gene in a colorectal cancer patient.

The total K-ras mutation frequency was 9.09, 18.61 and 6.67% in lung, colorectal and gastric cancer, respectively, as detected in all types of samples which suggested that the K-ras mutations occurred more frequently in colorectal cancer than in the other two types of cancer investigated. Of 187 lung cancer patients investigated, four mutation types were detected, including G12C (GGT>TGT), G12D (GGT>GAT), G12V (GGT>GTT) and G13D (GGC>GAC). The mutation frequency was 1.96, 11.45 and 20% in plasma, tumor tissue, and pleural and ascites samples, respectively, with no statistical significance being identified (P=0.0935). The ratio of male to female patients was 8.94 and 9.38%, respectively, which did not indicate statistical significance (P=0.9223). Similarly, the ratio for youth, middle age, and elderly patients was 11.11, 6.94 and 10.38%, respectively, which did not indicate statistical significance (P=0.7196). Of 505 colorectal cancer patients investigated, 11 mutation types were detected, including G12S (GGT>AGT), G12R (GGT>CGT), G12C (GGT>TGT), G12D (GGT>GAT), G12A (GGT>GCT), G12V (GGT>GTT), G13S (GGC>AGC), G13R (GGC>CGC), G13C (GGC>TGC), G13D (GGC>GAC) and Q61L (CAA>CTA). The mutation frequency for plasma, and tumor tissue samples was 5 and 20.45%, respectively, indicating statistical significance (P=0.0039). The ratio for male to female patients was 14.97 and 23.70%, respectively, indicating statistical significance (P=0.0129). Similarly, the ratio for youth, middle age, and elderly patients was 8.33, 21.03 and 19.2%, respectively, which did not indicate statistical significance (P=0.0824). Of 135 gastric cancer patients investigated, the mutation types G12D (GGT>GAT), and G13D (GGC>GAC) were detected. The mutation frequency for plasma, and tumor tissue samples was 0 and 7.14%, respectively, which did not indicate statistical significance (P=1.0000). The ratio for male to female patients was 7.61 and 4.65%, respectively, which indicated no statistical significance (P=0.7860). Similarly, the ratio for youth, middle age, to elderly patients was 9.09, 4.92 and 7.69%, respectively, which indicated no statistical significance (P=0.7425). Of all the K-ras mutation types in lung cancer, G12C accounted for 1.07%, G12D for 3.21%, G12V for 2.14%, G13D for 2.67% of the total mutation frequency. Analysis of colorectal cancer mutations showed that, G12D accounted for 7.13%, G12V for 2.97%, G13D for 4.95%, while the remaining mutation types collectively accounted for 3.56% of the total mutation frequency (Table II). In gastric cancer patients, only two K-ras mutation types were identified, with G12D accounting for 2.22%, whereas G13D accounted for 4.44% of the total mutation frequency. Thus, G12D and G13D are the two most frequently occurring mutation types in the three types of cancer investigated.

Discussion

The mammalian ras gene family comprises H-ras, K-ras, N-ras, encoding H-ras, K-ras, N-ras proteins, respectively, with a similar structure and function. The Ras protein is located in the inner region of the cell membrane, tranforms signals from EGFR to mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), to control cell growth, proliferation, and motility, as well as metastasis and angiogenesis (3). The K-ras gene usually contains point mutations at codons 12, 13 and 61 (Tables I–III), and these mutations often activate the K-ras oncogene (4,5). The K-ras mutation status is associated with the therapeutic efficacy of EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibodies, rendering patients with K-ras mutation as not suitable for Erbitux treatment (6). Various methods have been developed to improve detection sensitivity, such as denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) (7), nested Allele-Specific Blocker (ASB-)PCR (8), PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) (9), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (10), and the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) (11). Due to the need for simple equipment, high sensitivity, COLD-PCR (co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR) (12–15) has been widely used, it can enrich variant DNA sequences and improve detection sensitivity. In the present study, the results showed that the mutation frequency of K-ras was different in the three types of cancer, indicating statistical significance (P=0.0001). The ratio for the variables compared was highest in colorectal cancer. Thus, detection of K-ras mutation status is more important for colorectal cancer patients when personalized medicine is involved. The mutation frequency was not statistically significant for the different sample types for lung and gastric cancer. Therefore, plasma samples may be substituted by tissue samples when the latter are not readily available, particularly for lung cancer patients, from whom pleural and ascites samples are also feasible. However, other types of samples cannot be substituted for colorectal cancer tissues for K-ras mutation detection, considering that the detection frequency of K-ras mutations in tumor tissues is 4-fold that of plasma samples, with the difference between sample types being statistically significant for colorectal cancer patients. For lung cancer and gastric cancer patients, the mutation frequency indicated no statistical significance for gender, although a difference was identified for colorectal cancer. The frequency for male to female was 14.97 and 23.70% (P=0.0129), respectively, suggesting the likelihood of mutation in female colorectal cancer patients as compared with their male counterparts. Age did not affect the mutation frequency in the three types of cancer investigated, suggesting that K-ras mutation does not play a role in patient age Previously, an anticorrelation pattern of K-ras mutation status with the therapeutic effect, progression-free survival and overall survival following patient treatment with Erbitux was demonstrated (4,6). By contrast, results of other studies have shown that many patients cannot improve efficacy end-points after receiving Erbitux (16,17) without K-ras mutation detection. That finidng suggests that other key signal transduction molecules also play an important role in the downstream of Erbitux against EGFR, for example, B-raf, PIK3CA (17). Therefore, the mutation status of genes such as B-raf, and PIK3CA should be detected at the same time as the K-ras mutation status.
  17 in total

1.  Missense mutations in MLH1, MSH2, KRAS, and APC genes in colorectal cancer patients in Malaysia.

Authors:  Nor Azian Abdul Murad; Zulhabri Othman; Melati Khalid; Zuraini Abdul Razak; Rosniza Hussain; Sukumar Nadesan; Ismail Sagap; Isa Mohamed Rose; Wan Zurinah Wan Ngah; Rahman Jamal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  COLD-PCR: a new platform for highly improved mutation detection in cancer and genetic testing.

Authors:  Jin Li; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.407

3.  Routine EGFR and KRAS Mutation analysis using COLD-PCR in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A Pennycuick; T Simpson; D Crawley; R Lal; G Santis; P Cane; K Tobal; J Spicer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Prevalence of ras gene mutations in human colorectal cancers.

Authors:  J L Bos; E R Fearon; S R Hamilton; M Verlaan-de Vries; J H van Boom; A J van der Eb; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 28-Jun 3       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  KRAS and BRAF mutation status in circulating colorectal tumor cells and their correlation with primary and metastatic tumor tissue.

Authors:  Bianca Mostert; Yuqiu Jiang; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Haiying Wang; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Katharina Biermann; Jaco Kraan; Zarina Lalmahomed; Anne van Galen; Vanja de Weerd; Petra van der Spoel; Raquel Ramírez-Moreno; Cornelis Verhoef; Jan N M Ijzermans; Yixin Wang; Jan-Willem Gratama; John A Foekens; Stefan Sleijfer; John W M Martens
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Mutations of ras genes in human tumors (review).

Authors:  H Kiaris; D Spandidos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 7.  Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Schubbert; Kevin Shannon; Gideon Bollag
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Detection of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer with Fast COLD-PCR.

Authors:  Pietro Carotenuto; Cristin Roma; Salvatore Cozzolino; Francesca Fenizia; Anna Maria Rachiglio; Fabiana Tatangelo; Alessia Iannaccone; Luigi Baron; Gerardo Botti; Nicola Normanno
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy.

Authors:  Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Kras gene mutation and RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation: indicators of tumor staging and metastasis in adenocarcinomatous sporadic colorectal cancer in Indian population.

Authors:  Rupal Sinha; Showket Hussain; Ravi Mehrotra; R Suresh Kumar; Kapil Kumar; Pankaj Pande; Dinesh Chandra Doval; Seemi Farhat Basir; Mausumi Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantification of the Landscape for Revealing the Underlying Mechanism of Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Chong Yu; Jin Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Tumor suppressor microRNA-31 inhibits gastric carcinogenesis by targeting Smad4 and SGPP2.

Authors:  W Ruoming; Y Zhen; Z Tengteng; H Jisheng
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.987

3.  MiR-31 Regulates Rho-Associated Kinase-Myosin Light Chain (ROCK-MLC) Pathway and Inhibits Gastric Cancer Invasion: Roles of RhoA.

Authors:  Zhuo Chen; Shengnan Liu; Yuan Xia; Kejian Wu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-12-01

4.  Recombinant Adenovirus KGHV500 and CIK Cells Codeliver Anti-p21-Ras scFv for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer with Wild-Type Ras Overexpression.

Authors:  Mingjuan Wang; Yanling Hong; Qiang Feng; Xinyan Pan; Shuling Song; Jing Cui; Jin Lei; Hong Fang; Julun Yang
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 7.200

5.  KRAS Codon 12 and 13 Mutations in Gastric Cancer in the Northeast Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Ayatollahi; Alireza Tavassoli; Amir Hossein Jafarian; Amin Alavi; Sepideh Shakeri; Seyyede Fatemeh Shams; Maryam Sheikhi; Neda Motamedi Rad; Mohammad Hadi Sadeghian; Afsane Bahrami
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2018-07-17

6.  MicroRNA-31 Function as a Suppressor Was Regulated by Epigenetic Mechanisms in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Zijian Wang; Zhixiang Wang; Yong Yang; Changlai Fu; Jianqing Zhu; Danbin Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.