Literature DB >> 23233388

KRAS and BRAF mutation status in circulating colorectal tumor cells and their correlation with primary and metastatic tumor tissue.

Bianca Mostert1, Yuqiu Jiang, Anieta M Sieuwerts, Haiying Wang, Joan Bolt-de Vries, Katharina Biermann, Jaco Kraan, Zarina Lalmahomed, Anne van Galen, Vanja de Weerd, Petra van der Spoel, Raquel Ramírez-Moreno, Cornelis Verhoef, Jan N M Ijzermans, Yixin Wang, Jan-Willem Gratama, John A Foekens, Stefan Sleijfer, John W M Martens.   

Abstract

Although anti-EGFR therapy has established efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer, only 10-20% of unselected patients respond. This is partly due to KRAS and BRAF mutations, which are currently assessed in the primary tumor. To improve patient selection, assessing mutation status in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which possibly better represent metastases than the primary tumor, could be advantageous. We investigated the feasibility of KRAS and BRAF mutation detection in colorectal CTCs by comparing three sensitive methods and compared mutation status in matching primary tumor, liver metastasis and CTCs. CTCs were isolated from blood drawn from 49 patients before liver resection using CellSearch™. DNA and RNA was isolated from primary tumors, metastases and CTCs. Mutations were assessed by co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR (Transgenomic™), real-time PCR (EntroGen™) and nested Allele-Specific Blocker (ASB-)PCR and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. In 43 of the 49 patients, tissue RNA and DNA was of sufficient quantity and quality. In these 43 patients, discordance between primary and metastatic tumor was 23% for KRAS and 7% for BRAF mutations. RNA and DNA from CTCs was available from 42 of the 43 patients, in which ASB-PCR was able to detect the most mutations. Inconclusive results in patients with low CTC counts limited the interpretation of discrepancies between tissue and CTCs. Determination of KRAS and BRAF mutations in CTCs is challenging but feasible. Of the tested methods, nested ASB-PCR, enabling detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with as little as two CTCs, seems to be superior.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23233388     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  54 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in circulating tumour cell research.

Authors:  Catherine Alix-Panabières; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.

Authors:  Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Identification of recurrent mutational events in anorectal melanoma.

Authors:  Hui Min Yang; Susan J Hsiao; David F Schaeffer; Chi Lai; Helen E Remotti; David Horst; Mahesh M Mansukhani; Basil A Horst
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 5.  The promise of circulating tumor cells for precision cancer therapy.

Authors:  William L Hwang; Katie L Hwang; David T Miyamoto
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 6.  The current status of the clinical utility of liquid biopsies in cancer.

Authors:  Anson Snow; Denaly Chen; Julie E Lang
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 5.225

7.  Mutational Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Using a Novel Microfluidic Collection Device and qPCR Assay.

Authors:  Wael Harb; Andrea Fan; Tony Tran; Daniel C Danila; David Keys; Michael Schwartz; Cristian Ionescu-Zanetti
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Circulating tumor cells: exploring intratumor heterogeneity of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Raimondi; Chiara Nicolazzo; Angela Gradilone; Giuseppe Giannini; Elena De Falco; Isotta Chimenti; Elisa Varriale; Siegfried Hauch; Linda Plappert; Enrico Cortesi; Paola Gazzaniga
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  mRNA expression profiles of colorectal liver metastases as a novel biomarker for early recurrence after partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  E P van der Stok; M Smid; A M Sieuwerts; P B Vermeulen; S Sleijfer; N Ayez; D J Grünhagen; J W M Martens; C Verhoef
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Detection of KRAS mutations in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marcilei Ec Buim; Marcello F Fanelli; Virgilio S Souza; Juliana Romero; Emne A Abdallah; Celso Al Mello; Vanessa Alves; Luciana Mm Ocea; Natália B Mingues; Paula Nvp Barbosa; Chiang J Tyng; Rubens Chojniak; Ludmilla Td Chinen
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.