Literature DB >> 21971641

Detection of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer with Fast COLD-PCR.

Pietro Carotenuto1, Cristin Roma, Salvatore Cozzolino, Francesca Fenizia, Anna Maria Rachiglio, Fabiana Tatangelo, Alessia Iannaccone, Luigi Baron, Gerardo Botti, Nicola Normanno.   

Abstract

Patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) carrying activating mutations of the KRAS gene do not benefit from treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, KRAS mutation testing of mCRC patients is mandatory in the clinical setting for the choice of the most appropriate therapy. Co-amplification-at-lower denaturation-temperature PCR (COLD-PCR) is a novel modification of the conventional PCR method that selectively amplifies minority alleles from a mixture of wild-type and mutant sequences irrespective of the mutation type or position within the sequence. In this study, we compared the sensitivity of a COLD-PCR method with conventional PCR/sequencing and the real-time PCR-based Therascreen kit to detect KRAS mutations. By using dilutions of KRAS mutant DNA in wild-type DNA from colon cancer cell lines with known KRAS status, we found that Fast COLD-PCR is more sensitive than the conventional PCR method, showing a sensitivity of 2.5% in detecting G>A and G>T mutations. The detection of G>C transversions was not improved by either Fast COLD-PCR or Full COLD-PCR. We next analyzed by COLD-PCR, conventional PCR and Therascreen 52 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from mCRC patients. Among 36 samples with >30% tumor cells, 8 samples were negative by conventional PCR, Therascreen and Fast COLD-PCR; 20 mutations identified by conventional PCR were confirmed by Therascreen and Fast COLD-PCR; 8 cases undetermined by conventional PCR were all confirmed to carry KRAS G>A or G>T mutations by using either Therascreen or Fast COLD-PCR. Conventional PCR was able to detect only 2 KRAS mutations among 16 samples with <30% tumor cells (12.5%), whereas Therascreen and Fast COLD-PCR identified 6 mutants (37.5%). These data suggest that Fast COLD-PCR has a higher clinical sensitivity as compared with conventional PCR in detecting G>C to A>T changes in the KRAS gene, which represent >90% of the mutations of this oncogene in CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21971641     DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  11 in total

Review 1.  COLD-PCR Technologies in the Area of Personalized Medicine: Methodology and Applications.

Authors:  Florence Mauger; Alexandre How-Kit; Jörg Tost
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Single-tube, highly parallel mutation enrichment in cancer gene panels by use of temperature-tolerant COLD-PCR.

Authors:  Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos; Katherine Richardson; Rui Lin; Grant Wu; Mike G Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Enhanced ratio of signals enables digital mutation scanning for rare allele detection.

Authors:  Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos; Cloud Paweletz; Chen Song; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Harvey Mamon; Pasi A Jänne; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Automated objective determination of percentage of malignant nuclei for mutation testing.

Authors:  Hollis Viray; Madeline Coulter; Kevin Li; Kristin Lane; Aruna Madan; Kisha Mitchell; Kurt Schalper; Clifford Hoyt; David L Rimm
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2014 May-Jun

5.  Temperature-tolerant COLD-PCR reduces temperature stringency and enables robust mutation enrichment.

Authors:  E Castellanos-Rizaldos; Pingfang Liu; Coren A Milbury; Minakshi Guha; Angela Brisci; Laura Cremonesi; Maurizio Ferrari; Harvey Mamon; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Enrichment of mutations in multiple DNA sequences using COLD-PCR in emulsion.

Authors:  Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos; Coren Audrey Milbury; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing the Impact of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Separating Fact From Fiction.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Sanjay P Bagaria
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Fc gamma receptor IIIa polymorphisms in advanced colorectal cancer patients correlated with response to anti-EGFR antibodies and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Rosa Calemma; Alessandro Ottaiano; Anna Maria Trotta; Guglielmo Nasti; Carmela Romano; Maria Napolitano; Domenico Galati; Pasquale Borrelli; Serena Zanotta; Antonino Cassata; Giuseppe Castello; Vincenzo Rosario Iaffaioli; Stefania Scala
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Comparison of K-ras mutations in lung, colorectal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nanqiu Peng; Xintai Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe.

Authors:  J Han J M Van Krieken; Etienne Rouleau; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Scott D Patterson; Andreas Jung
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.