Literature DB >> 25012995

Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.

Judith S Brand1, Kamila Czene2, John A Shepherd3, Karin Leifland4, Boel Heddson5, Ann Sundbom6, Mikael Eriksson2, Jingmei Li7, Keith Humphreys2, Per Hall2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and an important determinant of screening sensitivity, but its clinical utility is hampered due to the lack of objective and automated measures. We evaluated the performance of a fully automated volumetric method (Volpara).
METHODS: A prospective cohort study included 41,102 women attending mammography screening, of whom 206 were diagnosed with breast cancer after a median follow-up of 15.2 months. Percent and absolute dense volumes were estimated from raw digital mammograms. Genotyping was performed in a subset of the cohort (N = 2,122). We examined the agreement by side and view and compared density distributions across different mammography systems. We also studied associations with established density determinants and breast cancer risk.
RESULTS: The method showed good agreement by side and view, and distributions of percent and absolute dense volume were similar across mammography systems. Volumetric density was positively associated with nulliparity, age at first birth, hormone use, benign breast disease, and family history of breast cancer, and negatively with age and postmenopausal status. Associations were also observed with rs10995190 in the ZNF365 gene (P < 1.0 × 10(-6)) and breast cancer risk [HR for the highest vs. lowest quartile, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.96 and 1.63 (1.10-2.42) for percent and absolute dense volume, respectively].
CONCLUSIONS: In a high-throughput setting, Volpara performs well and in accordance with the behavior of established density measures. IMPACT: Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density is a promising tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012995     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  32 in total

1.  Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density with Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Lin Ma; Kathleen R Brandt; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Fang Fang Wu; Stacey J Winham; Diana L Miglioretti; Aaron D Norman; John J Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Effect of Bazedoxifene and Conjugated Estrogen (Duavee) on Breast Cancer Risk Biomarkers in High-Risk Women: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Lauren Nye; Kandy R Powers; Jennifer L Nydegger; Amy L Kreutzjans; Teresa A Phillips; Trina Metheny; Onalisa Winblad; Carola M Zalles; Christy R Hagan; Merit L Goodman; Byron J Gajewski; Devin C Koestler; Prabhakar Chalise; Bruce F Kimler
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-08-16

3.  Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Patrick C Brennan; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-04

4.  Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.

Authors:  Susie Lau; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Christopher G Scott; Lin Ma; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Matthew R Jensen; Dana H Whaley; Fang Fang Wu; Serghei Malkov; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron D Norman; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?

Authors:  Siun M Walsh; Sandra B Brennan; Emily C Zabor; Laura H Rosenberger; Michelle Stempel; Lizza Lebron-Zapata; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Topical Endoxifen for Mammographic Density Reduction-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Magnus Bäcklund; Mikael Eriksson; Marike Gabrielson; Mattias Hammarström; Steve Quay; Jenny Bergqvist; Roxanna Hellgren; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Rachel Denholm; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.