Literature DB >> 31396783

Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?

Siun M Walsh1, Sandra B Brennan2, Emily C Zabor3, Laura H Rosenberger1, Michelle Stempel1, Lizza Lebron-Zapata2, Mary L Gemignani4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with dense breasts may have less-accurate preoperative evaluation of extent of disease, potentially affecting the achievement of negative margins. The goal of this study is to examine the association between breast density and re-excision rates in women having breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage I/II invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery between 1/1/2014 and 10/31/2014 were included. Breast density was assessed by two radiologists. The association between breast density and re-excision was examined using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and one women were included. Overall, 106 (15.1%) women had at least one re-excision. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with increased breast density (p < 0.001). On univariable analysis, increased breast density was associated with significantly increased odds of re-excision (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.83), as was multifocal disease, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive status, and extensive intraductal component (EIC) (all p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, breast density remained significantly associated with increased odds of re-excision (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.86), as did multifocality and EIC. HER2 positive status was not significantly associated with re-excision on multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with dense breasts are more likely to need additional surgery (re-excision after breast-conserving surgery), but increased breast density did not adversely affect disease-free survival in our study. Our findings support the need for further study in developing techniques that can help decrease re-excisions for women with dense breasts who undergo breast-conserving surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31396783      PMCID: PMC6868322          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07647-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  38 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.

Authors:  Johanna Holm; Keith Humphreys; Jingmei Li; Alexander Ploner; Abbas Cheddad; Mikael Eriksson; Sven Törnberg; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Anita Mamtani; Sarah Fuzesi; Michelle Stempel; Anne Eaton; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Olga Melnichouk; Lisa J Martin; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Meena S Moran; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Seema A Khan; Janet Horton; Suzanne Klimberg; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Gary Freedman; Nehmat Houssami; Peggy L Johnson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Laura Ichikawa; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Pamela M Vacek; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Bonnie Yankaskas; Patricia A Carney; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.

Authors:  Carolyn Nickson; Yulia Arzhaeva; Zoe Aitken; Tarek Elgindy; Mitchell Buckley; Min Li; Dallas R English; Anne M Kavanagh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Johanna O P Wanders; Katharina Holland; Nico Karssemeijer; Petra H M Peeters; Wouter B Veldhuis; Ritse M Mann; Carla H van Gils
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study.

Authors:  A H Olsen; K Bihrmann; M-B Jensen; I Vejborg; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Giske Ursin; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Laura Baglietto; Celine Vachon; Marije F Bakker; Graham G Giles; Kee Seng Chia; Kamila Czene; Louise Eriksson; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Ruth M L Warren; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; John L Hopper; Kavitha Krishnan; Jingmei Li; Qing Li; Ian Pagano; Bernard A Rosner; Chia Siong Wong; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Gertraud Maskarinec; Norman F Boyd; Carla H van Gils; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Revisiting the modern toolkit to optimize breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  David M Lesniak; Krishna B Clough; Brigid K Killelea
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA).

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Rubina M Trimboli; Nehmat Houssami; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Marina Álvarez Benito; Corinne Balleyguier; Massimo Bazzocchi; Peter Bult; Massimo Calabrese; Julia Camps Herrero; Francesco Cartia; Enrico Cassano; Paola Clauser; Andrea Cozzi; Danúbia A de Andrade; Marcos F de Lima Docema; Catherine Depretto; Valeria Dominelli; Gábor Forrai; Rossano Girometti; Steven E Harms; Sarah Hilborne; Raffaele Ienzi; Marc B I Lobbes; Claudio Losio; Ritse M Mann; Stefania Montemezzi; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Umit A Ozcan; Federica Pediconi; Katja Pinker; Heike Preibsch; José L Raya Povedano; Daniela Sacchetto; Gianfranco P Scaperrotta; Simone Schiaffino; Margrethe Schlooz; Botond K Szabó; Donna B Taylor; Özden S Ulus; Mireille Van Goethem; Jeroen Veltman; Stefanie Weigel; Evelyn Wenkel; Chiara Zuiani; Giovanni Di Leo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.