Literature DB >> 31661305

Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population.

Sue M Hudson1, Louise S Wilkinson2, Rachel Denholm3, Bianca L De Stavola4, Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to sex hormones is important in the pathogenesis of breast cancer and inability to tolerate such exposure may be reflected in increased asymmetrical growth of the breasts. This study aims to characterize, for the first time, asymmetry in breast volume (BV) and radiodense volume (DV) in a large ethnically diverse population.
METHODS: Automated measurements from digital raw mammographic images of 54,591 cancer-free participants (aged 47-73) in a UK breast screening programme were used to calculate absolute (cm3) and relative asymmetry in BV and DV. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess asymmetry associations with age and ethnicity.
RESULTS: BV and DV absolute asymmetry were positively correlated with the corresponding volumetric dimension (BV or DV). BV absolute asymmetry increased, whilst DV absolute asymmetry decreased, with increasing age (P-for-linear-trend <0.001 for both). Relative to Whites, Blacks had statistically significantly higher, and Chinese lower, BV and DV absolute asymmetries. However, after adjustment for the corresponding underlying volumetric dimension the age and ethnic differences were greatly attenuated. Median relative (fluctuating) BV and DV asymmetry were 2.34 and 3.28% respectively.
CONCLUSION: After adjusting for the relevant volumetric dimension (BV or DV), age and ethnic differences in absolute breast asymmetry were largely resolved. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Previous small studies have reported breast asymmetry-breast cancer associations. Automated measurements of asymmetry allow the conduct of large-scale studies to further investigate these associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31661305      PMCID: PMC6948085          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.629


  32 in total

Review 1.  Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1990-05

2.  Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maxine Tan; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.

Authors:  Han Na Lee; Yu-Mee Sohn; Kyung Hwa Han
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Reliability of automated breast density measurements.

Authors:  Olivier Alonzo-Proulx; Gordon E Mawdsley; James T Patrie; Martin J Yaffe; Jennifer A Harvey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study.

Authors:  Valerie Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment.

Authors:  Katharina Holland; Jan van Zelst; Gerard J den Heeten; Mechli Imhof-Tas; Ritse M Mann; Carla H van Gils; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Breast cancer laterality and molecular subtype likely share a common risk factor.

Authors:  Shao-Ang Cheng; Li-Zhong Liang; Qi-Lian Liang; Zhen-Yi Huang; Xiao-Xia Peng; Xiao-Cui Hong; Xing-Bo Luo; Gao-Le Yuan; Hui-Jie Zhang; Liang Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Left-handedness and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  L Fritschi; M Divitini; A Talbot-Smith; M Knuiman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Birth size and breast cancer risk: re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 studies.

Authors:  Isabel dos Santos Silva; Bianca De Stavola; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  The Association of Digit Ratio (2D : 4D) with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adomas Bunevicius
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.434

View more
  1 in total

1.  Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.