Literature DB >> 25012900

Interpreting 16S metagenomic data without clustering to achieve sub-OTU resolution.

Mikhail Tikhonov1, Robert W Leach2, Ned S Wingreen3.   

Abstract

The standard approach to analyzing 16S tag sequence data, which relies on clustering reads by sequence similarity into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), underexploits the accuracy of modern sequencing technology. We present a clustering-free approach to multi-sample Illumina data sets that can identify independent bacterial subpopulations regardless of the similarity of their 16S tag sequences. Using published data from a longitudinal time-series study of human tongue microbiota, we are able to resolve within standard 97% similarity OTUs up to 20 distinct subpopulations, all ecologically distinct but with 16S tags differing by as little as one nucleotide (99.2% similarity). A comparative analysis of oral communities of two cohabiting individuals reveals that most such subpopulations are shared between the two communities at 100% sequence identity, and that dynamical similarity between subpopulations in one host is strongly predictive of dynamical similarity between the same subpopulations in the other host. Our method can also be applied to samples collected in cross-sectional studies and can be used with the 454 sequencing platform. We discuss how the sub-OTU resolution of our approach can provide new insight into factors shaping community assembly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012900      PMCID: PMC4274427          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  42 in total

1.  Organismal, genetic, and transcriptional variation in the deeply sequenced gut microbiomes of identical twins.

Authors:  Peter J Turnbaugh; Christopher Quince; Jeremiah J Faith; Alice C McHardy; Tanya Yatsunenko; Faheem Niazi; Jason Affourtit; Michael Egholm; Bernard Henrissat; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distribution-based clustering: using ecology to refine the operational taxonomic unit.

Authors:  Sarah P Preheim; Allison R Perrotta; Antonio M Martin-Platero; Anika Gupta; Eric J Alm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Resource partitioning and sympatric differentiation among closely related bacterioplankton.

Authors:  Dana E Hunt; Lawrence A David; Dirk Gevers; Sarah P Preheim; Eric J Alm; Martin F Polz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzén; Thomas P Curtis; Russell J Davenport; Neil Hall; Ian M Head; L Fiona Read; William T Sloan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Bacterial community comparisons by taxonomy-supervised analysis independent of sequence alignment and clustering.

Authors:  Woo Jun Sul; James R Cole; Ederson da C Jesus; Qiong Wang; Ryan J Farris; Jordan A Fish; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; David Mark Welch; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 8.  Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: Tools, techniques, and challenges.

Authors:  Micah Hamady; Rob Knight
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Costello; Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Noah Fierer; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Denoising PCR-amplified metagenome data.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Benjamin J Callahan; Daniel S Fisher; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  70 in total

1.  Diazotroph Community Characterization via a High-Throughput nifH Amplicon Sequencing and Analysis Pipeline.

Authors:  John Christian Gaby; Lavanya Rishishwar; Lina C Valderrama-Aguirre; Stefan J Green; Augusto Valderrama-Aguirre; I King Jordan; Joel E Kostka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Marine microbial community dynamics and their ecological interpretation.

Authors:  Jed A Fuhrman; Jacob A Cram; David M Needham
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Ecological dynamics and co-occurrence among marine phytoplankton, bacteria and myoviruses shows microdiversity matters.

Authors:  David M Needham; Rohan Sachdeva; Jed A Fuhrman
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 4.  Diversity within species: interpreting strains in microbiomes.

Authors:  Thea Van Rossum; Pamela Ferretti; Oleksandr M Maistrenko; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Strain diversity and host specificity in a specialized gut symbiont of honeybees and bumblebees.

Authors:  Elijah Powell; Nalin Ratnayeke; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots.

Authors:  Ben Niu; Joseph Nathaniel Paulson; Xiaoqi Zheng; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Probing the ecological and evolutionary history of a thermophilic cyanobacterial population via statistical properties of its microdiversity.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Michelle Davison; Daniel S Fisher; Devaki Bhaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Community profiling of the urinary microbiota: considerations for low-biomass samples.

Authors:  Lisa Karstens; Mark Asquith; Vincent Caruso; James T Rosenbaum; Damien A Fair; Jonathan Braun; W Thomas Gregory; Rahel Nardos; Shannon K McWeeney
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Toward Accurate and Quantitative Comparative Metagenomics.

Authors:  Stephen Nayfach; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Feces of Pet Birds Using 16S Marker Sequencing.

Authors:  Jose F Garcia-Mazcorro; Stephany A Castillo-Carranza; Blake Guard; Jose P Gomez-Vazquez; Scot E Dowd; Donald J Brigthsmith
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.