Literature DB >> 27568186

Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Feces of Pet Birds Using 16S Marker Sequencing.

Jose F Garcia-Mazcorro1,2, Stephany A Castillo-Carranza3, Blake Guard4, Jose P Gomez-Vazquez5, Scot E Dowd6, Donald J Brigthsmith7.   

Abstract

Birds and other animals live and evolve in close contact with millions of microorganisms (microbiota). While the avian microbiota has been well characterized in domestic poultry, the microbiota of other bird species has been less investigated. The aim of this study was to describe the fecal bacterial communities of pet birds. Pooled fecal samples from 22 flocks representing over 150 individual birds of three different species (Melopsittacus undulatus or budgerigars, Nymphicus hollandicus or cockatiels, and Serinus canaria or domestic canaries) were used for analysis using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the MiSeq platform (Illumina). Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum (median 88.4 %; range 12.9-98.4 %) followed by other low-abundant phyla such as Proteobacteria (median 2.3 %; 0.1-85.3 %) and Actinobacteria (median 1.7 %; 0-18.3 %). Lactobacillaceae (mostly Lactobacillus spp.) was the most abundant family (median 78.1 %; 1.4-97.5 %), especially in budgerigars and canaries, and it deserves attention because of the ascribed beneficial properties of lactic acid bacteria. Importantly, feces from birds contain intestinal, urinary, and reproductive-associated microbiota thus posing a serious problem to study one anatomical region at a time. Other groups of interest include the family Clostridiaceae that showed very low abundance (overall median <0.1 %) with the exception of two samples from cockatiels (14 and 45.9 %) and one sample from budgerigars (19.9 %). Analysis of UniFrac metrics showed that overall, the microbial communities from the 22 flocks tended to cluster together for each bird species, meaning each species shed distinctive bacterial communities in feces. This descriptive analysis provides insight into the fecal microbiota of pet birds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; Health; Microbiota; PICRUSt; Pet birds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27568186     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0840-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  68 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of high mutation rates: adaptive evolution of bacteria in the mouse gut.

Authors:  A Giraud; I Matic; O Tenaillon; A Clara; M Radman; M Fons; F Taddei
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effects of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains on jejunal and cecal microbiota of broiler chicken under acute heat stress condition as revealed by molecular analysis of 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Pham Thi Ngoc Lan; Mitsuo Sakamoto; Yoshimi Benno
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.955

3.  Adapting to environmental changes using specialized paralogs.

Authors:  Gabino Sanchez-Perez; Alex Mira; Gábor Nyiro; Lejla Pasić; Francisco Rodriguez-Valera
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 4.  The tragedy of the uncommon: understanding limitations in the analysis of microbial diversity.

Authors:  Stephen J Bent; Larry J Forney
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Lactobacillus psittaci sp. nov., isolated from a hyacinth macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus).

Authors:  P A Lawson; C Wacher; I Hansson; E Falsen; M D Collins
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Effects of two diets on the haematology, plasma chemistry and intestinal flora of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  I Fischer; C Christen; H Lutz; H Gerlach; M Hässig; J-M Hatt
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Ecological significance of microdiversity: identical 16S rRNA gene sequences can be found in bacteria with highly divergent genomes and ecophysiologies.

Authors:  Elke Jaspers; Jörg Overmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Phylogenetic analysis of cecal microbiota in chicken by the use of 16S rDNA clone libraries.

Authors:  Pham Thi Ngoc Lan; Hidenori Hayashi; Mitsuo Sakamoto; Yoshimi Benno
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.955

9.  Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities.

Authors:  Catherine A Lozupone; Micah Hamady; Scott T Kelley; Rob Knight
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Catherine Lozupone; Rob Knight
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  12 in total

1.  Exploring the cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus) fecal microbiome, bacterial inhabitants of a worldwide pet.

Authors:  Luis David Alcaraz; Apolinar M Hernández; Mariana Peimbert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  What's the risk? Identifying potential human pathogens within grey-headed flying foxes faeces.

Authors:  Rebekah Henry; Penelope Galbraith; Scott Coutts; Toby Prosser; John Boyce; David T McCarthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium affects the gut microbiome and body weight gain in CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Xiaoming Bian; Liang Chi; Bei Gao; Pengcheng Tu; Hongyu Ru; Kun Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of gizzard and intestinal microbiota of wild neotropical birds.

Authors:  M Alexandra García-Amado; Hakdong Shin; Virginia Sanz; Miguel Lentino; L Margarita Martínez; Monica Contreras; Fabian Michelangeli; María Gloria Domínguez-Bello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of the Artificial Sweetener Neotame on the Gut Microbiome and Fecal Metabolites in Mice.

Authors:  Liang Chi; Xiaoming Bian; Bei Gao; Pengcheng Tu; Yunjia Lai; Hongyu Ru; Kun Lu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Gut Brain Axis and Its Microbiota Regulation in Mammals and Birds.

Authors:  Jan S Suchodolski
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract       Date:  2018-01

7.  Cloacal swabs and alcohol bird specimens are good proxies for compositional analyses of gut microbial communities of Great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Kasun H Bodawatta; Katerina Puzejova; Katerina Sam; Michael Poulsen; Knud A Jønsson
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-03-17

8.  Methylmercury Production and Degradation under Light and Dark Conditions in the Water Column of the Hells Canyon Reservoirs, USA.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Todd P Luxton; Christopher D Knightes; Vishal Shah
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.218

9.  The Low-Diversity Fecal Microbiota of the Critically Endangered Kākāpō Is Robust to Anthropogenic Dietary and Geographic Influences.

Authors:  Elena K Perry; Andrew Digby; Michael W Taylor
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Mitigating the impact of microbial pressure on great (Parus major) and blue (Cyanistes caeruleus) tit hatching success through maternal immune investment.

Authors:  Roschong Boonyarittichaikij; Elin Verbrugghe; Daan Dekeukeleire; Diederik Strubbe; Sarah Van Praet; Robbe De Beelde; Lieze Rouffaer; Frank Pasmans; Dries Bonte; Kris Verheyen; Luc Lens; An Martel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.