Lisa Jahns1, LuAnn K Johnson1, Susan T Mayne1, Brenda Cartmel1, Matthew J Picklo1, Igor V Ermakov1, Werner Gellermann1, Leah D Whigham1. 1. From the USDA/Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, ND (LJ, LDW, and MJP); the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND (LKJ); the Yale School of Public Health and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (STM and BC); and the Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (IVE and WG).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Objective biomarkers are needed to assess adherence to vegetable and fruit intervention trials. Blood carotenoids are considered the best biomarker of vegetable and fruit intake, but collecting blood is invasive and the analyses are relatively expensive for population studies. Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) is an innovative method for assessing carotenoids in skin noninvasively. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare blood carotenoid concentrations with skin carotenoid assessments by RRS during a controlled feeding intervention. DESIGN: Twenty-nine participants consumed low-carotenoid diets (6 wk, phases 1 and 3), a provided diet containing 6-cup equivalents (1046 g/d) of vegetables and fruit (8 wk, phase 2), and usual diet (final 8 wk, phase 4). RESULTS: At baseline, skin and plasma total carotenoid values were correlated (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). Skin and plasma carotenoid values decreased (P < 0.001) 36% and 30%, respectively, from baseline to the end of phase 1 and then increased (P < 0.001) by >200% at the end of phase 2. Plasma carotenoids returned to baseline concentrations by the middle of phase 3 and skin carotenoid concentrations by the middle of phase 4. Skin carotenoid status predicted plasma values by using a mixed linear model including all time points (r = 0.72, P < 0.001), which indicates that changes in skin carotenoid status closely follow changes in plasma across a broad range of intakes. At the individual level, skin carotenoids predicted plasma values (r = 0.70, P < 0.001) over all time points. CONCLUSION: Skin carotenoid status assessed by resonance Raman spectroscopy is a noninvasive, objective biomarker of changes in vegetable and fruit intake.
BACKGROUND: Objective biomarkers are needed to assess adherence to vegetable and fruit intervention trials. Blood carotenoids are considered the best biomarker of vegetable and fruit intake, but collecting blood is invasive and the analyses are relatively expensive for population studies. Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) is an innovative method for assessing carotenoids in skin noninvasively. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare blood carotenoid concentrations with skin carotenoid assessments by RRS during a controlled feeding intervention. DESIGN: Twenty-nine participants consumed low-carotenoid diets (6 wk, phases 1 and 3), a provided diet containing 6-cup equivalents (1046 g/d) of vegetables and fruit (8 wk, phase 2), and usual diet (final 8 wk, phase 4). RESULTS: At baseline, skin and plasma total carotenoid values were correlated (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). Skin and plasma carotenoid values decreased (P < 0.001) 36% and 30%, respectively, from baseline to the end of phase 1 and then increased (P < 0.001) by >200% at the end of phase 2. Plasma carotenoids returned to baseline concentrations by the middle of phase 3 and skin carotenoid concentrations by the middle of phase 4. Skin carotenoid status predicted plasma values by using a mixed linear model including all time points (r = 0.72, P < 0.001), which indicates that changes in skin carotenoid status closely follow changes in plasma across a broad range of intakes. At the individual level, skin carotenoids predicted plasma values (r = 0.70, P < 0.001) over all time points. CONCLUSION: Skin carotenoid status assessed by resonance Raman spectroscopy is a noninvasive, objective biomarker of changes in vegetable and fruit intake.
Authors: Nicole Jontony; Emily B Hill; Christopher A Taylor; Laura C Boucher; Vince O'Brien; Rick Weiss; Colleen K Spees Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Rachel E Scherr; Kevin D Laugero; Dan J Graham; Brian T Cunningham; Lisa Jahns; Karina R Lora; Marla Reicks; Amy R Mobley Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Marcela D Radtke; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts; Lisa Jahns; Gina C Firnhaber; Brittany M Loofbourrow; April Zeng; Rachel E Scherr Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Colleen K Spees; Emily B Hill; Elizabeth M Grainger; Jackie L Buell; Susan E White; Matthew D Kleinhenz; Steven K Clinton Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Stephanie Bell Jilcott Pitts; Lisa Jahns; Qiang Wu; Nancy E Moran; Ronny A Bell; Kimberly P Truesdale; Melissa N Laska Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Igor V Ermakov; Maia Ermakova; Mohsen Sharifzadeh; Aruna Gorusupudi; Kelliann Farnsworth; Paul S Bernstein; Jodi Stookey; Jane Evans; Tito Arana; Lisa Tao-Lew; Carly Isman; Anna Clayton; Akira Obana; Leah Whigham; Alisha H Redelfs; Lisa Jahns; Werner Gellermann Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Brenda Cartmel; Chelsea Anderson; Melinda L Irwin; Maura Harrigan; Tara Sanft; Fangyong Li; Werner Gellermann; Igor V Ermakov; Leah M Ferrucci Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Talha Rafiq; Sandi M Azab; Koon K Teo; Lehana Thabane; Sonia S Anand; Katherine M Morrison; Russell J de Souza; Philip Britz-McKibbin Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 8.701