Literature DB >> 25002703

Phenotypic integration in style dimorphic daffodils (Narcissus, Amaryllidaceae) with different pollinators.

Rocío Pérez-Barrales1, Violeta I Simón-Porcar2, Rocío Santos-Gally2, Juan Arroyo2.   

Abstract

Different pollinators can exert different selective pressures on floral traits, depending on how they fit with flowers, which should be reflected in the patterns of variation and covariation of traits. Surprisingly, empirical evidence in support of this view is scarce. Here, we have studied whether the variation observed in floral phenotypic integration and covariation of traits in Narcissus species is associated with different groups of pollinators. Phenotypic integration was studied in two style dimorphic species, both with dimorphic populations mostly visited by long-tongued pollinators (close fit with flowers), and monomorphic populations visited by short-tongued insects (loose fit). For N. papyraceus, the patterns of variation and correlation among traits involved in different functions (attraction and fit with pollinators, transfer of pollen) were compared within and between population types. The genetic diversity of populations was also studied to control for possible effects on phenotypic variation. In both species, populations with long-tongued pollinators displayed greater phenotypic integration than those with short-tongued pollinators. Also, the correlations among traits involved in the same function were stronger than across functions. Furthermore, traits involved in the transfer of pollen were consistently more correlated and less variable than traits involved in the attraction of insects, and these differences were larger in dimorphic than monomorphic populations. In addition, population genetic parameters did not correlate with phenotypic integration or variation. Altogether, our results support current views of the role of pollinators in the evolution of floral integration.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; genetic diversity; phenotypic selection; plasticity; pollinator-mediated selection; style dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002703      PMCID: PMC4084543          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  45 in total

1.  Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly?

Authors:  A E Faivre; L A McDade
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Geographical differentiation in floral traits across the distribution range of the Patagonian oil-secreting Calceolaria polyrhiza: do pollinators matter?

Authors:  Andrea Cosacov; Andrea A Cocucci; Alicia N Sérsic
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Population structure and genetic diversity in tristylous Narcissus triandrus: insights from microsatellite and chloroplast DNA variation.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hodgins; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept.

Authors:  W S Armbruster; V S Di Stilio; J D Tuxill; T C Flores; J L Velásquez Runk
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Macroevolutionary patterns of pollination accuracy: a comparison of three genera.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon; Thomas F Hansen; Geir H Bolstad
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Decoupled phenotypic variation between floral and vegetative traits: distinguishing between developmental and environmental correlations.

Authors:  Christophe Pélabon; Nora C Osler; Martin Diekmann; Bente J Graae
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus).

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae).

Authors:  Juan Arroyo; Spencer C H Barrett; Rosario Hidalgo; William W Cole
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi.

Authors:  Rocio Pérez-Barrales; Pablo Vargas; Juan Arroyo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Phenotypic covariance at species' borders.

Authors:  M Julian Caley; Edward Cripps; Edward T Game
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  10 in total

1.  A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Fornoni; Mariano Ordano; Rubén Pérez-Ishiwara; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The role of pollinators in the evolution of corolla shape variation, disparity and integration in a highly diversified plant family with a conserved floral bauplan.

Authors:  José M Gómez; Ruben Torices; Juan Lorite; Christian Peter Klingenberg; Francisco Perfectti
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts.

Authors:  Pamela K Diggle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Floral variation and environmental heterogeneity in a tristylous clonal aquatic of the Pantanal wetlands of Brazil.

Authors:  Nicolay Leme da Cunha; Erich Fischer; Aline P Lorenz-Lemke; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Genetic and environmental integration of the hawkmoth pollination syndrome in Ruellia humilis (Acanthaceae).

Authors:  John S Heywood; Joseph S Michalski; Braden K McCann; Amber D Russo; Kara J Andres; Allison R Hall; Tessa C Middleton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Evaluation of pollen tube growth ability in Petunia species having different style lengths.

Authors:  Miyako Kato; Hitoshi Watanabe; Yoichiro Hoshino
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.308

7.  Development of G: a test in an amphibious fish.

Authors:  Joseph M Styga; Thomas M Houslay; Alastair J Wilson; Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits varies in space and between morphs in Primula secundiflora.

Authors:  Yun Wu; Tao Zhong; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Qing-Jun Li
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross-pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity.

Authors:  Violeta I Simón-Porcar; A Jesús Muñoz-Pajares; Alejandra de Castro; Juan Arroyo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 10.323

Review 10.  Integrated phenotypes: understanding trait covariation in plants and animals.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon; Geir H Bolstad; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.