Literature DB >> 25002698

Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts.

Pamela K Diggle1.   

Abstract

Within-individual variation in virtually every conceivable morphological and functional feature of reiterated structures is a pervasive feature of plant phenotypes. In particular, architectural effects, regular, repeatable patterns of intra-individual variation in form and function that are associated with position are nearly ubiquitous. Yet, flowers also are predicted to be highly integrated. For animal-pollinated plants, the coordination of multiple organs within each flower is required to achieve the complex functions of pollinator attraction and orientation, pollen donation and pollen receipt. To the extent that pollinators may select for multiple independent functions, phenotypic integration within flowers may also be modular. That is, subsets of floral structures may be integrated but vary independently of other subsets of structures that are themselves integrated. How can phenotypic integration and modularity be understood within the context of architectural effects? This essay reviews recent research on patterns of floral integration and modularity and explores the potential for spatial and temporal changes in the selective environment of individual flowers to result in positional variation in patterns of morphological integration.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  architectural effects; flower morphology; integration; modularity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002698      PMCID: PMC4084538          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  41 in total

1.  Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability.

Authors:  Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly?

Authors:  A E Faivre; L A McDade
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  Floral plasticity in an iteroparous plant: the interactive effects of genotype, environment, and ontogeny in Campanula rapunculoides (Campanulaceae).

Authors:  D W Vogler; S Peretz; A G Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  The past, present, and future of vegetative phase change.

Authors:  R Scott Poethig
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Genetics of floral traits influencing reproductive isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens.

Authors:  Scott A Hodges; Justen B Whittall; Michelle Fulton; Ji Y Yang
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration.

Authors:  Mariano Ordano; Juan Fornoni; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept.

Authors:  W S Armbruster; V S Di Stilio; J D Tuxill; T C Flores; J L Velásquez Runk
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Relaxed pollinator-mediated selection weakens floral integration in self-compatible taxa of Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  Ingrid A Anderson; Jeremiah W Busch
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  The genetic basis for natural variation in heteroblasty in Antirrhinum.

Authors:  M Manuela R Costa; Suxin Yang; Joanna Critchley; Xianzhong Feng; Yvette Wilson; Nicolas Langlade; Lucy Copsey; Andrew Hudson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Pollinator preferences for Nicotiana alata, N. forgetiana, and their F1 hybrids.

Authors:  Anthony Ippolito; G Wilson Fernandes; Timothy P Holtsford
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  17 in total

1.  Detecting canalization and intra-floral modularity in triggerplant (Stylidium) flowers: correlations are only part of the story.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Juliet A Wege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Presence of fruits decreases probability of retaining flowers in a sequentially flowering plant.

Authors:  Shivani Jadeja; Brigitte Tenhumberg
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.276

3.  Why are the seed cones of conifers so diverse at pollination?

Authors:  Juan M Losada; Andrew B Leslie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Contrasting lengths of Pelargonium floral nectar tubes result from late differences in rate and duration of growth.

Authors:  Timothy Tsai; Pamela K Diggle; Henry A Frye; Cynthia S Jones
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Effects of intrinsic environmental predictability on intra-individual and intra-population variability of plant reproductive traits and eco-evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  Martí March-Salas; Guillermo Fandos; Patrick S Fitze
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Genetic and environmental integration of the hawkmoth pollination syndrome in Ruellia humilis (Acanthaceae).

Authors:  John S Heywood; Joseph S Michalski; Braden K McCann; Amber D Russo; Kara J Andres; Allison R Hall; Tessa C Middleton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Flower-level developmental plasticity to nutrient availability in Datura stramonium: implications for the mating system.

Authors:  Iván Darío Camargo; Julieta Nattero; Sonia A Careaga; Juan Núñez-Farfán
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Integrated phenotypes: understanding trait covariation in plants and animals.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon; Geir H Bolstad; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Morphogeometric Approaches to Non-vascular Plants.

Authors:  Daniel E Stanton; Catherine Reeb
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification.

Authors:  Hervé Sauquet; Maria von Balthazar; Susana Magallón; James A Doyle; Peter K Endress; Emily J Bailes; Erica Barroso de Morais; Kester Bull-Hereñu; Laetitia Carrive; Marion Chartier; Guillaume Chomicki; Mario Coiro; Raphaël Cornette; Juliana H L El Ottra; Cyril Epicoco; Charles S P Foster; Florian Jabbour; Agathe Haevermans; Thomas Haevermans; Rebeca Hernández; Stefan A Little; Stefan Löfstrand; Javier A Luna; Julien Massoni; Sophie Nadot; Susanne Pamperl; Charlotte Prieu; Elisabeth Reyes; Patrícia Dos Santos; Kristel M Schoonderwoerd; Susanne Sontag; Anaëlle Soulebeau; Yannick Staedler; Georg F Tschan; Amy Wing-Sze Leung; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.