Background and Aims: Much of morphological evolution in flowers has arisen from pollinator-mediated selection, often manifest as a match between the length of the pollinator's proboscis and the depth of tubular corollas or spurs. We investigate development, growth and homology of the unique nectar tube of Pelargonium, frequently described as 'a spur adnate to the pedicel'. Methods: We focused on two species. The nectar tube of P. ionidiflorum is three times longer than that of P. odoratissimum. Light and scanning electron microscopy were carried out, and daily growth measurements were used to compare nectar tube development and vascular patterns. Key Results: Nectar tubes in both species are initiated centripetally to the dorsal sepal in a space created by lateral displacement of two antepetalous stamens. The cavity deepens through subsequent intercalary growth of the receptacle that proceeds at the same rate in both species until tubes reach approx. 10 mm in length. Differences in final nectar tube lengths arise via an increase in the rate and duration of growth of the receptacle that begins just before anthesis (floral opening) and continues for several days past anthesis in P. ionidiflorum but does not occur in P. odoratissimum. Epidermal cells of the dorsal surface of the nectar tube in P. ionidiflorum are approx. 1.6 times longer than those in P. odoratissimum. Histological sections show no evidence that the nectar tube is a spur that became evolutionarily fused to the pedicel. Conclusions: Nectar tubes in Pelargonium are localized cavities that form in the receptacle via intercalary growth. Differences in the rate and duration of growth just prior to and following anthesis underlie differences in final tube lengths. Because differences in cell lengths do not fully account for differences in nectar tube lengths, evolutionary diversification must involve changes in both cell cycle and cell expansion.
Background and Aims: Much of morphological evolution in flowers has arisen from pollinator-mediated selection, often manifest as a match between the length of the pollinator's proboscis and the depth of tubular corollas or spurs. We investigate development, growth and homology of the unique nectar tube of Pelargonium, frequently described as 'a spur adnate to the pedicel'. Methods: We focused on two species. The nectar tube of P. ionidiflorum is three times longer than that of P. odoratissimum. Light and scanning electron microscopy were carried out, and daily growth measurements were used to compare nectar tube development and vascular patterns. Key Results: Nectar tubes in both species are initiated centripetally to the dorsal sepal in a space created by lateral displacement of two antepetalous stamens. The cavity deepens through subsequent intercalary growth of the receptacle that proceeds at the same rate in both species until tubes reach approx. 10 mm in length. Differences in final nectar tube lengths arise via an increase in the rate and duration of growth of the receptacle that begins just before anthesis (floral opening) and continues for several days past anthesis in P. ionidiflorum but does not occur in P. odoratissimum. Epidermal cells of the dorsal surface of the nectar tube in P. ionidiflorum are approx. 1.6 times longer than those in P. odoratissimum. Histological sections show no evidence that the nectar tube is a spur that became evolutionarily fused to the pedicel. Conclusions: Nectar tubes in Pelargonium are localized cavities that form in the receptacle via intercalary growth. Differences in the rate and duration of growth just prior to and following anthesis underlie differences in final tube lengths. Because differences in cell lengths do not fully account for differences in nectar tube lengths, evolutionary diversification must involve changes in both cell cycle and cell expansion.
Authors: Marina M Strelin; Santiago Benitez-Vieyra; Juan Fornoni; Christian Peter Klingenberg; Andrea A Cocucci Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon; Geir H Bolstad; Thomas F Hansen Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Sara J van de Kerke; Tiemen van Engelenhoven; Anne L van Es; Laura Schat; Lisa M van Son; Sverre Vink; Lia Hemerik; Robin van Velzen; M Eric Schranz; Freek T Bakker Journal: PeerJ Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Marina M Strelin; Eduardo E Zattara; Kristian Ullrich; Mareike Schallenberg-Rüdinger; Stefan Rensing Journal: Evodevo Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 2.250