Literature DB >> 29528365

Why are the seed cones of conifers so diverse at pollination?

Juan M Losada1,2, Andrew B Leslie1.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: Form and function relationships in plant reproductive structures have long fascinated biologists. Although the intricate associations between specific pollinators and reproductive morphology have been widely explored among animal-pollinated plants, the evolutionary processes underlying the diverse morphologies of wind-pollinated plants remain less well understood. Here we study how this diversity may have arisen by focusing on two conifer species in the pine family that have divergent reproductive cone morphologies at pollination.
Methods: Standard histology methods, artificial wind pollination assays and phylogenetic analyses were used in this study. Key
Results: A detailed study of cone ontogeny in these species reveals that variation in the rate at which their cone scales mature means that pollination occurs at different stages in their development, and thus in association with different specific morphologies. Pollination experiments nevertheless indicate that both species effectively capture pollen. Conclusions: In wind-pollinated plants, morphological diversity may result from simple variation in development among lineages rather than selective pressures for any major differences in function or performance. This work also illustrates the broader importance of developmental context in understanding plant form and function relationships; because plant reproductive structures perform many different functions over their lifetime, subtle differences in development may dramatically alter the specific morphologies that they use to meet these demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29528365      PMCID: PMC6007286          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  27 in total

1.  Linking development with generation of novelty in mammalian teeth.

Authors:  J Jernvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Conifer ovulate cones accumulate pollen principally by simple impaction.

Authors:  James E Cresswell; Kevin Henning; Christophe Pennel; Mohamed Lahoubi; Michael A Patrick; Phillipe G Young; Gavin R Tabor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Jannice Friedman; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  The evolution of plant reproductive systems: how often are transitions irreversible?

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Transition from wind pollination to insect pollination in sedges: experimental evidence and functional traits.

Authors:  Peter D Wragg; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 7.  Evolvability of flower geometry: Convergence in pollinator-driven morphological evolution of flowers.

Authors:  Natalia Joanna Woźniak; Adrien Sicard
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  Predicting the pathway to wind pollination: heritabilities and genetic correlations of inflorescence traits associated with wind pollination in Schiedea salicaria (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  S G Weller; A K Sakai; T M Culley; D R Campbell; A K Dunbar-Wallis
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Predicting evolutionary patterns of mammalian teeth from development.

Authors:  Kathryn D Kavanagh; Alistair R Evans; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? An experimental test in a buzz-pollinated species with anther dimorphism.

Authors:  Lislie Solís-Montero; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth in Gymnosperms.

Authors:  Maria Breygina; Ekaterina Klimenko; Olga Schekaleva
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.