| Literature DB >> 25001261 |
Miho Yamauchi1, Etsuko Imabayashi, Hiroshi Matsuda, Jyoji Nakagawara, Masaaki Takahashi, Eku Shimosegawa, Jun Hatazawa, Michiyasu Suzuki, Hideyuki Iwanaga, Kenji Fukuda, Koji Iihara, Hidehiro Iida.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A recently developed technique which reconstructs quantitative images from original projection data acquired using existing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) devices enabled quantitative assessment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) at rest and after acetazolamide challenge. This study was intended to generate a normal database and to investigate its inter-institutional consistency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25001261 PMCID: PMC4244544 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-014-0879-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Nucl Med ISSN: 0914-7187 Impact factor: 2.668
Study conditions at three institutions
| Institution | SPECT camera | Collimatora | BCFb (Bq/mL) | Well/SPECT CCFc | Spatial resolutiond (mm) | # of subjects | Age‖ (years) | Weight (kg) | Administration dose of acetazolamide¶ (mg/kg) | PaCO2 (mmHg) | Administration dose of123I-IMP** (MBq) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | SIEMENS Symbia | LMEGP parallel beam | 87956 | 0.799 | 17.13 |
| 63.9 ± 2.5 | 57.4 ± 7.8 | 17.8 ± 2.4 (total dose fixed at 1000) | 38.5 ± 4.5 | 122.1 ± 3.3 |
| B | TOSHIBA GCA9300 | LMEHR fan beam (N2) | 72281 | 0.619 | 11.22 |
| 59.1 ± 2.5 | 62.8 ± 11.3 | 15.0 ± 0.1 | 40.2 ± 0.7 | 142.2 ± 8.4 |
| C | TOSHIBA GCA9300 | LESHR fan beam (N1) | 112419 | 0.948 | 10.26 |
| 63.2 ± 4.2 | 50.1 ± 7.8 | 16.8 ± 0.9 | 37.5 ± 3.1 | 155.9 ± 14.9 |
| Total | – | – | – | – | – |
| 61.7 ± 3.8 | 57.4 ± 10.7 | 16.4 ± 1.9 | 38.8 ± 3.3 | 139.8 ± 16.1 |
Results from multiple comparison test: ‖ P < 0.05 for A vs. B, ¶ P < 0.05 for A vs. B and B vs. C, ** P < 0.05 for A vs. B, B vs. C and A vs. C
aCollimator: LMEGP low-medium energy general purpose, LMEHR low-medium energy high resolution, LESHR low energy super-high resolution
bBCF: Becquerel calibration factor is the factor to convert reconstructed images by QSPECT to have units of Bq/mL. Smaller number corresponds to greater sensitivity of SPECT system
cCCF: cross-calibration factor is defined as the sensitivity of well counter relative to SPECT images. Since SPECT images are already converted to Bq/mL, CCF corresponds to the absolute sensitivity to given radioisotopes
dSpatial resolution was determined from the experiment using the 3-dimensional brain phantom (see text)
Fig. 1Scanning protocol flow for the DTARG procedures. 123I-iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP) was injected at 0 min, and 28-min resting dynamic SPECT scan was commenced. Blood sample for calibration of population input function was drawn at 10 min. Acetazolamide was administered at 20 min. CBF values are scaled by last frame (time 24–28 min). Second dynamic SPECT scan followed second injection of 123I-IMP at 30 min
Fig. 2Regions-of-interest (ROI) semi-automatically defined by the NEURO FLEXER software. ACA anterior cerebral artery, MCA middle cerebral artery, PCA posterior cerebral artery, BG basal ganglia. Hemisphere includes areas of ACA, MCA, PCA, BG, and thalamus
Fig. 3Example clinical images of quantitative CBF before the spatial resolution equalization, at rest and after acetazolamide challenge. One typical case was selected from each of the three institutions. The same color scale was applied to these quantitative CBF images
Summary results of CBF values obtained after spatial resolution-equalized CBF images at rest and after acetazolamide challenge
| Rest | Institution A ( | Institution B ( | Institution C ( | All institutions ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (mL/min/100 g) | Mean ± SD (mL/min/100 g) | Mean ± SD (mL/min/100 g) | Mean ± SD (mL/min/100 g) | |
| Hemisphere | ||||
| Right | 37.6 ± 6.1 | 34.2 ± 6.4 | 36.4 ± 4.2 | 35.9 ± 5.9 |
| Left | 37.2 ± 6.2 | 34.1 ± 6.4 | 36.2 ± 3.9 | 35.6 ± 5.8 |
| Anterior cerebral artery (ACA) | ||||
| Right | 38.8 ± 6.5 | 34.4 ± 7.6 | 36.2 ± 4.7 | 36.2 ± 6.7 |
| Left | 38.0 ± 6.2 | 34.4 ± 7.3 | 36.7 ± 4.7 | 36.1 ± 6.5 |
| Middle cerebral artery (MCA) | ||||
| Right | 38.5 ± 6.3 | 34.4 ± 6.6 | 36.6 ± 4.2 | 36.3 ± 6.1 |
| Left | 37.5 ± 6.1 | 33.9 ± 6.5 | 36.0 ± 3.9 | 35.6 ± 5.9 |
| Posterior cerebral artery (PCA) | ||||
| Right | 42.7 ± 7.2 | 37.5 ± 6.7 | 38.7 ± 4.4 | 39.3 ± 6.6 |
| Left | 42.8 ± 7.9 | 37.4 ± 6.4 | 38.6 ± 3.8 | 39.3 ± 6.6 |
| Basal ganglia (BG) | ||||
| Right | 39.4 ± 6.1 | 36.9 ± 6.7 | 39.4 ± 4.9 | 38.4 ± 6.1 |
| Left | 39.0 ± 5.7 | 37.0 ± 7.1 | 39.1 ± 4.3 | 38.2 ± 6.1 |
| Thalamus | ||||
| Right | 36.0 ± 5.1 | 34.0 ± 6.2 | 37.5 ± 3.4 | 35.7 ± 5.4 |
| Left | 35.7 ± 5.0 | 34.4 ± 6.0 | 37.8 ± 3.7 | 35.8 ± 5.3 |
| Cerebellum | ||||
| Right | 38.6 ± 6.3 | 36.6 ± 6.4 | 37.3 ± 4.1 | 37.4 ± 5.8 |
| Left | 39.8 ± 6.8 | 36.4 ± 7.0 | 38.2 ± 4.6 | 37.9 ± 6.4 |
| Centrum semiovale (white matter) | ||||
| Right | 26.8 ± 4.0 | 23.9 ± 4.5 | 27.5 ± 3.5 | 25.8 ± 4.4 |
| Left | 26.5 ± 4.7 | 24.0 ± 4.2 | 27.1 ± 3.4 | 25.7 ± 4.3 |
| Averaged for right and left | ||||
| Hemisphere | 37.4 ± 6.1 | 34.2 ± 6.4 | 36.3 ± 4.0 | 35.7 ± 5.8 |
| ACA | 38.4 ± 6.3 | 34.4 ± 7.5 | 36.5 ± 4.7 | 36.2 ± 6.6 |
| MCA | 38.0 ± 6.2 | 34.2 ± 6.5 | 36.3 ± 4.0 | 35.9 ± 6.0 |
| PCA | 42.7 ± 7.4 | 37.4 ± 6.5 | 38.7 ± 4.0 | 39.3 ± 6.5 |
| BG | 39.2 ± 5.8 | 36.9 ± 6.9 | 39.2 ± 4.6 | 38.3 ± 6.1 |
| Thalamus | 35.9 ± 4.9 | 34.2 ± 6.1 | 37.7 ± 3.5 | 35.8 ± 5.3 |
| Pons | 30.7 ± 6.2 | 29.3 ± 5.2 | 31.5 ± 3.5 | 30.4 ± 5.1 |
| Vermis | 41.1 ± 7.3 | 36.8 ± 6.4 | 40.4 ± 4.1 | 39.1 ± 6.4 |
| Cerebellum | 39.2 ± 6.5 | 36.5 ± 6.6 | 37.7 ± 4.3 | 37.6 ± 6.1 |
| White matter | 26.7 ± 4.3 | 24.0 ± 4.3 | 27.3 ± 3.4 | 25.8 ± 4.3 |
Values are mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD)
†† P = 0.04
Fig. 4Stereotactic CBF images, normalized and averaged over the subjects at each institution and also for all subjects, at rest (a) and after acetazolamide challenge (b). Calculation was performed on spatial resolution-equalized images using 3D-SSP software. No region showed statistical difference between any combinations of the institutions, after the spatial resolution-equalization procedure
Fig. 5Comparison of CBF images normalized over the subjects at each institution at rest (a) and after acetazolamide challenge (b). Spatial resolution-equalized CBF images were used for this analysis. Statistical analysis demonstrated that no significance was seen among the three institutions both at rest and after acetazolamide challenge, when the extent threshold of 100 voxels was selected. Note that all images are displayed using the same color scale with the normalized maximum values at each condition