Literature DB >> 25000930

[Hybrid laparoscopic thoracotomic esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis].

J Hoeppner1, G Marjanovic, T Glatz, B Kulemann, U T Hopt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the past decades various techniques of esophagectomy for the curative treatment of esophageal cancer have been described. Especially minimally invasive techniques of esophagectomy have been used increasingly in the last decade. Technical issues and results of hybrid laparoscopic-thoracotomic en bloc esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (HMIE) are presented and discussed in the article. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2013 and April 2014 a total of 23 patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the University of Freiburg Medical Center. Of these patients 10 were treated by HMIE and the other 13 patients had open esophagectomy (OE).
RESULTS: A detailed description of the operative technique of HMIE is given in a step-by-step fashion. Margin negative resection was achieved in all patients after HMIE and OE and the median lymph node yield of lymphadenectomy in HMIE and OE (29 vs. 27) was nearly the same. The medium duration of the operation (347 min vs. 412 min) and median length of stay on the intensive care unit (6 days vs. 9 days) and hospital (13 days vs. 17 days) were decreased in HMIE patients compared to OE, respectively. Overall postoperative morbidity (40 % vs. 69 %) and especially pulmonary morbidity (10 % vs. 46 %) were also favorable in HMIE. No anastomotic leakage and postoperative in-hospital mortality occurred after HMIE.
CONCLUSION: The HMIE procedure combines the advantages of minimally invasive operative approaches on especially postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy with the high safety of anastomosis and reconstruction achieved in OE. Further advantages are shorter duration of operation and shorter length of hospital stay in HMIE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25000930     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-014-2783-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  17 in total

1.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  D M Parkin; P Pisani; J Ferlay
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Reliable preparation of the gastric tube for cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Takeru Matsuda; Kunihiko Kaneda; Manabu Takamatsu; Masanori Takahashi; Keishi Aishin; Masahide Awazu; Akiko Okamoto; Katsunori Kawaguchi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Association of no epidural analgesia with postoperative morbidity and mortality after transthoracic esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Huibert A Cense; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Koen de Jong; Jikke M T Omloo; Olivier R C Busch; Ch Pieter Henny; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Delayed postoperative emptying after esophageal resection is dependent on the size of the gastric substitute.

Authors:  W A Bemelman; C W Taat; J F Slors; J J van Lanschot; H Obertop
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Arteriography of three models of gastric oesophagoplasty: the whole stomach, a wide gastric tube and a narrow gastric tube.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Ndoye; Abdarahmane Dia; Assane Ndiaye; Babacar Fall; Mamadou Diop; Abdoulaye Ndiaye; Moussa Lamine Sow
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for oesophageal replacement.

Authors:  P Jagot; A Sauvanet; L Berthoux; J Belghiti
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Trends in management and prognosis for esophageal cancer surgery: twenty-five years of experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Alberto Ruol; Carlo Castoro; Giuseppe Portale; Francesco Cavallin; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Matteo Cagol; Rita Alfieri; Luigi Corti; Caterina Boso; Giovanni Zaninotto; Alberto Peracchia; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03

10.  Complications after esophagogastrectomy using stapling instruments.

Authors:  D D Muehrcke; R J Donnelly
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Goran Marjanovic; Birte Kulemann; Olivia Sick; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Jens Hoeppner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  [Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?]

Authors:  I Gockel; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer : Evolution of management and prognosis over the last 3 decades].

Authors:  T Glatz; G Marjanovic; K Zirlik; T Brunner; U T Hopt; F Makowiec; J Hoeppner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.