Literature DB >> 24997754

Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Naoya Yoshida1, Yoshifumi Baba, Masayuki Watanabe, Satoshi Ida, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Ryuichi Karashima, Shiro Iwagami, Yu Imamura, Yasuo Sakamoto, Yuji Miyamoto, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Postoperative morbidity remains common after esophagectomy. There are currently few tools that can be used to estimate the incidence of complications. This study aimed to create a novel scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity.
METHODS: A total of 365 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy with two- or three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into development (n = 250) and validation datasets (n = 115). A scoring system was established by specifying the expected morbidity incidence values for all independent predictors in the development dataset, after which, the reproducibility was confirmed in the validation dataset.
RESULTS: The incidence of any morbidity was 44.7 %. Male sex, severe emaciation (body mass index <18), a lower performance status (grade 1 or 2), operation ≥540 min and massive bleeding (blood loss/body weight ≥20) were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity. The total of all predictive scores was calculated. The incidence of any morbidity and of severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥IIIb) significantly correlated with the score after dividing the scores into three groups (≤8, 10 and 11 and ≥13). This finding was also confirmed in the validation dataset.
CONCLUSION: The current scoring system is considered to be useful for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997754     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0958-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  34 in total

1.  Perioperative risk analysis for acute respiratory distress syndrome after elective oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Diana J Paul; Glyn G Jamieson; David I Watson; Peter G Devitt; Philip A Game
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Validation of a nomogram predicting complications after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Brechtje A Grotenhuis; Pieter van Hagen; Johannes B Reitsma; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Shiro Iwagami; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Transthoracic oesophagectomy with lymphadenectomy in 100 oesophageal cancer patients: multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  V Valentí; J L Hernández-Lizoain; F Marínez-Regueira; M Bellver; J Rodríguez; J A Díaz González; W Torres; J J Sola; J Alvarez-Cienfuegos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  A comparison of POSSUM and GPS models in the prediction of post-operative outcome in patients undergoing oesophago-gastric cancer resection.

Authors:  Sumanta Dutta; Nesrin M Al-Mrabt; Grant M Fullarton; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Case volume as a predictor of inpatient mortality after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Michael Rodgers; Blair A Jobe; Robert W O'Rourke; Brett Sheppard; Brian Diggs; John G Hunter
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-09

7.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Lagarde; Johannes B Reitsma; Anna-Karin D Maris; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo Obertop; Aelko H Zwinderman; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masaru Morita; Hajime Otsu; Hiroyuki Kawano; Yuta Kasagi; Yasue Kimura; Hiroshi Saeki; Koji Ando; Satoshi Ida; Eiji Oki; Eriko Tokunaga; Tetsuo Ikeda; Tetsuya Kusumoto; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model.

Authors:  Cameron D Wright; John C Kucharczuk; Sean M O'Brien; Joshua D Grab; Mark S Allen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  2 in total

1.  Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kojiro Eto; Naoya Yoshida; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Junji Kurashige; Satoshi Ida; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Incidence and treatment of mediastinal leakage after esophagectomy: Insights from the multicenter study on mediastinal leaks.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Andrea Celotti; Paolo Parise; Andrea Cossu; Luigi Bonavina; Daniele Bernardi; Giovanni de Manzoni; Jacopo Weindelmayer; Giuseppe Verlato; Stefano Santi; Giovanni Pallabazzer; Nazario Portolani; Maurizio Degiuli; Rossella Reddavid; Stefano de Pascale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.