Literature DB >> 24997492

Association between surgeon characteristics and their preferences for guideline-concordant staging and treatment for rectal cancer.

Mary E Charlton1, Lorren R Mattingly-Wells2, Jorge E Marcet3, Brenna C McMahon Waldschmidt4, John W Cromwell5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer guidelines recommend transrectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for locoregional staging and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for Stage II/III disease, but studies show these are underutilized. We examined how surgeon preferences align with guidelines or vary by training.
METHODS: Questionnaires on training, years of practice, and staging/treatment preferences were sent to surgeons practicing in Florida.
RESULTS: Of 759 surveys distributed, 321 (42%) responded; 158 were excluded because they were trainees, not treating rectal cancer, or not board certified/eligible. Among the remaining 163, 71% were general surgeons, 18% colorectal surgeons, and 11% surgical oncologists. Colorectal surgeons and surgical oncologists were more likely than general surgeons to prefer transrectal ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging (79% vs 50%; P < .01), and neoadjuvant CRT (71% vs 45%; P < .01). Differences remained significant after adjusting for years in practice.
CONCLUSION: Increased focus on appropriate use of staging procedures and neoadjuvant CRT within general surgery training/educational programs is warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guideline adherence; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997492      PMCID: PMC4267050          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  20 in total

1.  Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Afina S Glas; Frederik J M Slors; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  James S Wu; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in predicting pathologic stage of rectal cancer before and after preoperative radiation therapy.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; R J Myerson; R D Fry; I J Kodner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings.

Authors:  G F Gualdi; E Casciani; A Guadalaxara; C d'Orta; E Polettini; G Pappalardo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness.

Authors:  N K Kim; M J Kim; J K Park; S I Park; J S Min
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Local excision of rectal cancer: what is the evidence?

Authors:  S Sengupta; J J Tjandra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  F Marusch; A Koch; U Schmidt; R Zippel; R Kuhn; S Wolff; M Pross; A Wierth; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  A prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; Heidi Nelson; Robert L Maccarty; Janet E Olson; Jonathan E Clain; David A Ahlquist; Mary L Jondal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  MRI Local Staging and Restaging in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Gregory dePrisco
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

2.  Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement.

Authors:  D Kokotovic; I Gögenur; F Helgstrand
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Adherence to quality measures improves survival in esophageal cancer in a retrospective cohort study of the national cancer database from 2004 to 2016.

Authors:  Akash Adhia; Joseph Feinglass; Cary Jo Schlick; David Odell
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Surgeon-Level Variation in Utilization of Local Staging and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Stage II-III Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; David E Skarda; William T Sause; Ute Gawlick; George M Cannon; Mark A Lewis; Courtney L Scaife; Jesse A Gygi; H Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Trends with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and clinical staging for those with rectal malignancies.

Authors:  Sanjay S Reddy; Beth Handorf; Jeffrey M Farma; Elin R Sigurdson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-27

6.  Major differences in follow-up practice of patients with colorectal cancer; results of a national survey in the Netherlands.

Authors:  S M Qaderi; N A T Wijffels; A J A Bremers; J H W de Wilt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.