Literature DB >> 11129420

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness.

N K Kim1, M J Kim, J K Park, S I Park, J S Min.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative staging is essential for planning of optimal therapy for patients with rectal cancer. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used frequently because of its benefits of clear pelvic image are better than other diagnostic methods. The purpose of this study was to determine accuracy rates and clinical usefulness of MRI in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
METHODS: Between February, 1997, and December, 1999, 217 patients with histologically proven rectal cancer were staged preoperatively and had surgical resections performed. MRI criteria for depth of invasion was determined by the degree of disruption of the rectal wall. Metastatic perirectal lymph nodes were considered to be present if they showed heterogenous texture, irregular margin, and enlargement (>10 mm).
RESULTS: The accuracy of the MRI for determining depth of invasion was 176/217 (81%) and regional lymph node invasion was 110/217 (63%). In the T stage, accuracy rate of T1 was 3/4 (75%), T2 was 20/37 (54%), T3 was 141/162 (87%), and T4 was 12/14 (86%), respectively. The specificity of lymph node invasion was 45/110 (41%) and the sensitivity was 91/107 (85%). The accuracy rate of regional lymph node involvement was 136/217 (63%). T1 and T2 were overstaged in 1/4 (25%) and 17/37 (46%), respectively, and T3 was understaged in 15/162 (9.2%). The accuracy rate to detect metastatic lateral pelvic lymph node was 4/14 (29%) after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was done in 14 patients under MRI. The accuracy rate in assessing levator ani muscle tumor involvement was 8/11 (72%).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI showed a good, comparable accuracy rate for determining depth of tumor invasion, compared with transrectal ultrasonography, which still has a low accuracy rate for detecting metastatic lymph node. MRI with endorectal coil may increase the accuracy rate of T1 and T2 lesions. In addition, clear sagittal and coronal sectional pelvic images can give a lot of information about adjacent organ invasion or any invasion of levator ani muscle. MRI can be useful for choosing an appropriate extent of lymph node dissection and type of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129420     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0732-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  33 in total

Review 1.  Management of colorectal cancers.

Authors:  R Lewis; A Flynn; M E Dean; A Melville; A Eastwood; A Booth
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

2.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyung Chun; Woo-Yong Lee; Seong-Hyeon Yun; Sang-Yong Song; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Min Ju Kim; Jongmee Lee; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prediction of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis from lower rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging and risk factors for metastasis: Multicenter study of the Lymph Node Committee of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.

Authors:  Shimpei Ogawa; Jin-Ichi Hida; Hideyuki Ike; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Eiji Shinto; Michio Itabashi; Takahiro Okamoto; Masakazu Yamamoto; Kenichi Sugihara; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Paul Hermanek; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Claus Rödel; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincent J Obias; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

6.  Rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  James S Wu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

7.  Management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Johannes H W de Wilt; Maarten Vermaas; Floris T J Ferenschild; Cornelis Verhoef
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

8.  Factors related to preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin and the extent of mesorectal invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Young-Wan Kim; Seung-Whan Cha; Juyon Pyo; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Myeong-Jin Kim; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Assessment of the prognostic factors for a local recurrence of rectal cancer: the utility of preoperative MR imaging.

Authors:  Young Taik Oh; Myeong Jin Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Won Ho Kim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Association between surgeon characteristics and their preferences for guideline-concordant staging and treatment for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Lorren R Mattingly-Wells; Jorge E Marcet; Brenna C McMahon Waldschmidt; John W Cromwell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.